Memorandum from Goldstein to Guinier; Correspondence from Goldstein to Bartholet
Correspondence
February 1, 1983
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman & Wilder Working Files. Memorandum from Goldstein to Guinier; Correspondence from Goldstein to Bartholet, 1983. 72b8e2e0-ee92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/cc5a4bca-e5a8-4d12-beef-90f4160a2999/memorandum-from-goldstein-to-guinier-correspondence-from-goldstein-to-bartholet. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
4EUoR4IpgU
TO : Lani Guinier
FROl,l: Barry L. C,oldstein BW
DATE: I February 1983
I have enclosed my letter to Betsy on the Voting Rights
Act.
BLG:oet
Enc losu r e
L esar @rense Hr Is t: ffi [:lf , :.['^Hi,:)f -: ?:ffi'13 ] ai 5i#?:J]f,
806 Fifteenth Street, N.W., Suite 940
Washington, D.C. 2005o (2OZ) 638-3278
1 February 1983
Professor Elizabeth Bartholet
Assistant Professor of Law
Harvard Law School
Cambr idge , Ivlassachusetts 0 21 38
Dear Betsy:
In addition to the question of whether the addition of a
city to the jurisdiction of section 5 must be pre-cleared, I
would like the student to prepare a memorandum concerning
whether , if covered by section 5, the change should be
cleared. See Beer v. United States, 425 U.S. 130, 141 (1975)
("In other wordF-Ehe purpose-oT-J5-nas always been to insure
that no voting-procedure changes would be made that would
lead to a retrogression in the position of racial minorities
with respect to their effective exercise of the electoral
franchise.") Thanks.
Very truly yours,
Tu*n ,f' LfiJofr-"
Barry L( C,oldstein
BLG:oet
Conlributions are deiuctible lor A.S. income lar purposes
The NMCP TEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATI0NAL FUIID is not part of the National Association lor the Advancement of Colored People allhough it
was founded by it and shares ib commitment to equal rights. LDF has had lor over 20 years a separate Board, program, staff, otfice and budgel