Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Defendants' Response to Pugh Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification; Memorandum in Support of Response to Pugh Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification

Public Court Documents
June 24, 1982

Cite this item

Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Defendants' Response to Pugh Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification; Memorandum in Support of Response to Pugh Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Corrected versions

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 2677917d-d792-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f

Cite this item

Case Files, Chisom Hardbacks. Index to Hardback 3, 1988. 8bd3aa1a-f411-ef11-9f89-0022482f7547. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b775321f-a9a9-4383-b910-ec853d402ce4/index-to-hardback-3. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    RONALD CHISOM v. EDWIN EDWARDS  

HARDBACK 41' 3 

05-04-88 AFFIDAVITS OF : ISRAEL M. AUGUSTINE, Jr., 
REVIUS O. ORTIQUE, & SILAS LEE, III. 1 

05-06-88 AFFIDAVIT OF DR. RICHARD L. ENGSTROM. 2 

05-09-88 • Cover letter from Roy Rodney with enclosures of 
MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL OR, IN 
THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR ISSUANCE OF THE MANDATE, & 
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPEALLANTS' 
MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL OR, IN 
THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR ISSUANCE OF THE MANDATE. 3 

05-12-88 DEFENDANTS-APPEALLEES' MOTION FOR TIME TO 
RESPOND. , 4 

05-13-88 ORDER: Was granted to. appellees for ten days 
to file a response to appellants motion 5 

05-23-88 ORDER TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE WAS 
GRANTED (see order for details) 6 

05-23-88 FILED COPY OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF  
AS AMICUS CURIAE. 7 

05-23-88 BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE, PASCAL F. CALOGERO, JR., 
IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR AN 
INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL. 8 

05-23-88 

05-24-88 

05-28-88 

06-01-88 

06-07-88 

06-08-88 

06-17-88 

06-23-88 

06-27-88 

OPPOSITION, TO PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR 
AN INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL OR, IN THE 
ALTERNATIVE, FOR ISSUANCE OF ATHE MANDATE AND 
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF. 9 

letter from Peter J. Butler to Pam Karlan with 
MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE BRIEF AS  
AMICUS CURIAE. . 10 

'BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A 
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

MINUTE ENTRY. 

MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO APPEAR HEREIN AS 
AMICUS CURIAE & ORDER 

11 

12 

13 

MOTION FOR LEAVE OF-COURT TO APPEAR HEREIN AS 
AMICUS CURIAE with MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 
SAID MOTION. 14 

MOTIONT 
eieki fs 747-&-PAze,444.t-cia.Ay Are-ofto-4 oL/4 

c4/OR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE (BR F AS 
AMICUS CURIAE. 15 

MINUTE ENTRY. 16 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE, 
ORDER AND AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF filed by Pascal 
F. Calogero, Jr. with cover letter from Charles 
A. kronlage, Jr. 17

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Defendants' Response to Pugh Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification; Memorandum in Support of Response to Pugh Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in