Correspondence from Carraway Re: Maps in Hunt v. Cromartie
Correspondence
October 11, 2000

7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Senate hearing notes (Statements from Senators Hatch and Mathias), 1982. 6143fa65-dc92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4bb78ee2-38aa-4f26-a1ad-3c8efba7be52/senate-hearing-notes-statements-from-senators-hatch-and-mathias. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
• Senator HATCH. Would the Senator yield~ I am going to vote J}gainst his amendment, but I would like to observe that the chairman /"of the Department of Government at the University of Virginia, Pro fessor Abraham, had this to say during the hearings: "Only those who live in a dream WQrld can fail to perceive the basic thrust and purpose and inevitable result of new section 2." I submit that this "compromise" section 2 is not going to be any different in result or effect, to use some terms that have been batted around. "It is to e.s tablish a pattern of proportional representation now based upon race. Perhaps at a later moment in time, upon gender or religion or WJ>tionality." ....,- So I am going to vote against this amendment because I disagree with the present section 2, not primarily this amendment. • ____ T-~"--' o 1] •J .. :u --------~-~ \ \ \ tJ.xec. ~ .... - ~"1' ~ • Senator MATHIAS. You~want the prevailing side to draft, the initial The CHAIRMAN. The prevailing side wil~ dr:;t t e m1 ,la. repor · \ report~ . ft h · •t· 1 t I am going to ask the chairman of the Constltu~wn Subcommittee, who handled the bill all the way through, to submit the report to the ~en ate. I want to ask you to do that and act as floor manager of th~ bill; Senator DoLE. Mr. Chairman, since it was a substitute which,. m effect, was adopted by a vote of 14 to 4, which is really the same thmg \ we just had, which was 19 to 1, I would hope that tl~ose of u~-be cause there were four people, including the subcommittee chairman \ who, voted against the substitute-if those of us who offered the sub stitute will have an opportunity to have some input into the report. The CHAIRMAN. Absolutely. Senator KENNEDY. Can you clarify that~ The CHAIRMAN. All of those who voted for the bill on the prevailing side will haveinput into the report. Senator DoLE. We do not want the report dictated by somebody who really opposes it. The CHAIRMAN. That will not be the case. Senator MATHIAS. Can we submit a draft~ It seems to me that those of us who were working for the compromise could submit a draft, at least the beginning. Senator HATCH. Mr. Chairman, we will straighten that out. I sup port the bill. I did not support the Dole amendment. We will straighten that out and it will be fairly described in the report. The CHAIRMAN. I do not think there will be any trouble. Senator Hatch is very fair. He has worked hard all the way through. _ __.,; ~nator DoLE. I want to make certain they understand we wanrto work together. ' Senator HATCH. We will work together. • ---