Fullilove v. Kreps Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as Amici Curiae

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1979

Fullilove v. Kreps Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as Amici Curiae preview

Date is approximate. Fullilove v. Kreps Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., the National Urban League, Inc., the National Bankers Association, Inc., and the National Bar Association, as Amici Curiae

Cite this item

  • Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Fullilove v. Kreps Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund et al. as Amici Curiae, 1979. eace877e-b29a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/cd251d71-6d41-40c1-a12f-ed454262571f/fullilove-v-kreps-brief-of-the-naacp-legal-defense-and-educational-fund-et-al-as-amici-curiae. Accessed April 29, 2025.

    Copied!

    I n the

§>upmn? (Emirt ni %  Initeft Males
October T erm, 1979 

No. 78-1007

H. E arl F ullilove, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

J xjanita K reps, et al.

ON WRIT OP CERTIORARI TO
THE UNITED STATES COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

BRIEF OF THE
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., 
THE NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, INC., THE NATIONAL 
BANKERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AND THE NATIONAL BAR 

ASSOCIATION, AS AMICI CURIAE

E gbert L. H arris 
W illiam A. B orders, J r.

Of Counsel

J ack Greenberg 
J ames M. Nabrit, I I I  
Deborah F ins 
E ric Schnapper 

Suite 2030 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019

Vernon E. J ordan, J r.
500 E. 62nd Street
New York, New York 10021

Counsel for Amici Curiae



I N D E X

I n t e r e s t  of  Amici  .......................................................... • 1

Summary o f  Argument  .............................................................  4

ARGUMENT

I .  THE APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL
STANDARD .....................................................  5

I I .  THE ORIGIN OF THE MBE
PROVISION ........................................................  15

I I I .  THE PURPOSES OF THE MBE
PROVISION ......................................................  30

(1)  Overcoming D i s c r i m i n a t i o n -
Based Prob lems o f  M inor ­
i t y  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r ­
p r i s e s  .................................................  31

(2 )  Reducing  Black  Unemploy­
ment ......................................................  36

(3 )  The Lack o f  A v a i l a b l e
A l t e r n a t i v e s  ................................... 38

CONCLUSION .................................................................  42

Page



TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

A lb e m a r le  P a pe r  C o .v .  Moody,
422 U.S.  405 (1975)  ....................................... 2

F e r g u so n  v.  Sk rupa ,  372 U.S.
726 (1963)  .................................... ............................  30

Gr iggs  v .  Duke Power C o . ,  401 U.S.
424 (1971)  ........................ .................. ................ .. . 2

Lochner  v . New York ,  198 U.S.  45
(1905)  ..............     30

R egen t s  o f  U n i v e r s i t y  of  C a l i f o r n i a
v.  Bakke,  438 U.S.  265 (1978)  . . . . . .  4 , 5 , 6 , 7

U n i t e d  J e w i sh  O r g a n i z a t i o n s  v.  C a rey ,
430 U.S.  144 (1977)  ..........      4 , 5

S t a t u t e s  and C o n s t i t u t i o n a l  P r o v i s i o n s

F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment t o  t h e  U.S.
C o n s t i t u t i o n  ............................   4 , 6 , 7 ,

12-14

15 U.S .C .  § 63 7 (a )  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27,41

42 U.S .C .  § 6703 ......................................................   18

42 U.S .C .  § 6704 ............................................   18

42 U.S .C.  § 6705(d)  .........................................................  18

42 U.S .C .  § 6706 ................................................................  18

42 U.S .C .  § 6707(a )  ( i )  .....................................    28

Page

-  i i  -



Page

26 U.S .C .  § 6709 ...............................................................  26

42 U.S .C .  § 6721 ...............................................................  19

13 S t a t .  507 (1865)  ........................................................ 4

14 S t a t .  c .  200 (1866)  ................................................  8

14 S t a t .  Res.  368 (1866)  ............................................ 8

15 S t a t .  Res.  4 (1867)  ................................................   8

C i v i l  R i g h t s  Act  o f  1866,
14 S t a t .  27   13

Loca l  P u b l i c  Works C a p i t a l  Development 
and I n v e s tm e n t  Act  o f  1976, 42 
U.S .C.  § 6701,  e t  s e q ...................................  Pa ss im

P u b l i c  Works Employment Act  o f  1977,
91 S t a t .  116 ........................................................ Pa ss im

L e g i s l a t i v e  M a t e r i a l s

123 Cong. Rec. (1977)  ....................................... 2 0 - 2 2 ,2 6 - 2 8
3 1 - 3 2 ,3 5 - 3 7 ,

39
Cong. Globe ,  39 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .

(1866)  ...........................................................................  9 -14

Cong. Globe ,  38 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .
(1864)  ........................................................................... 8

S. Rep. 95-38  (1977)  ....................................................  21 ,23

S. Rep. 94-636 (1976)  .................................................. 39

S. Rep. 91 -1343 (1970)  ...............................................  34 ,39

H. Rep. 95-20  ( 1977)  .................................................  21

H. Rep. 94-1791 (1977)  ...............................................  34 ,39

-  i i i  -



Page

H. Rep. 94-468 (1975)  ........................ .. 33 ,3 9

H. Rep. 92-1615 (1972)  .................................... ...........  39

H. R. Rep. No. 2, 38 th  C ong . ,
1 s t  S e s s . (1864)  ...................................................  10

H. Doc. 95 -68 ,  95 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .
(1977 ) ............................................................... .. 21

H. R. Exec .  Doc. No. 11, 39 th  Cong . ,
1 s t  S e s s .  (1865)  ...................... ............................ 8

J o i n t  H e a r in g  on M i n o r i t y  C o n t r a c t i n g
B efo re  t h e  S e n a t e  S e l e c t  Committee  
on Small  B u s i n e s s  and t h e  Sub­
comm it tee  on M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  
and G e n e r a l  O v e r s i g h t  of  t h e  House 
Small  B u s i n e s s  Commit tee ,  95 th  Cong . ,
2d S e s s .  (1978)  .....................................................  27

H e a r i n g s ,  B e fo re  t h e  Subcommit t ee  oh
Economic Development  of  t h e  House 
Committee  on P u b l i c  Works and 
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ,  95 th  C o n g . ,
1 s t  S e s s .  (1977)  ................. .................................  25, 26

H e a r in g s  on t h e  Conduct  o f  Moneta ry
P o l i c y  B e f o re  t h e  House Commit tee  on 
Banking ,  F i n a n c e  and Urban A f f a i r s ,
95 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  (1977)  ......................  21

H e a r in g s  on t h e  Small  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a ­
t i o n  8 ( a )  C o n t r a c t  Procurem en t  
Program B e f o re  t h e  S e n a t e  Com­
m i t t e e  on Sm all  B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  
Cong . ,  2d S e s s .  (1976)  ................... ........... .. 38 ,39

i v  -



Page

H e a r in g s  on SBIC and SBLC Programs
and S e l e c t e d  SBA A c t i v i t i e s  B e fo re  
t h e  Subcom mit tee  on SBA 
O v e r s i g h t  and M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e s  
of  t h e  House Commit tee  on Small  
B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .
(1976)  ...........................................................................  40

O v e r s i g h t  H e a r in g s  on Small  B u s i n e s s
A d m i n i s t r a t i o n  Programs and A c t i v i t i e s  
B e fo re  t h e  Subcommit t ee  on 
SBA O v e r s i g h t  and M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e s  
o f  t h e  House Commit tee  on Small  
B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .
(1976)  ......................................................................... 40

H e a r in g s  on P rocu rem en t  A s s i s t a n c e  Programs 
of  t h e  S n a i l  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n  
B efo re  t h e  S e n a t e  Commit tee  on 
Small  B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  
S e s s .  (1975)  .................................................................... 40

H e a r in g s  on M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  and A l l i e d  
Problems o f  Sm all  B u s i n e s s  B e fo re  t h e  
Subcom mit tee  on SBA O v e r s i g h t  and 
M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  o f  t h e  House 
Commit tee  on Sm all  B u s i n e s s ,
94 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .
(1975)  .............................................................................  40

H e a r in g s  on Government  M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  
Programs — F i s c a l  Year  1974, B e fo re  
t h e  Subcommit t ee  on M i n o r i t y  B u s in e s s  
E n t e r p r i s e  and F r a n c h i s i n g  of  t h e  
House Commit tee  on Sm all  B u s i n e s s ,
93rd Cong . ,  2d S e s s .  (1974)  .......................... 40

H ear ings  on SBA's 8 ( a )  S u b c o n t r a c t i n g  
Program —• M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  
B e fo re  t h e  Subcommit tee  on Government  
P rocurem ent  o f  t h e  S e n a t e  Commit tee  on Small  
B u s i n e s s ,  92nd Cong . ,  1 s t
S e s s .  ( 1 9 7 1 ) .................................................................  40

-  v -



Page

O the r  A u t h o r i t i e s

E x e c u t i v e  Order  11458 ....................................  32

P u b l i c  P a p e rs  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,
Jimmy C a r t e r ,  1977 ............................................ 23

V I I I  Messages and P a pe rs  of  t h e
P r e s i d e n t s  (1914)  ..............................................  9 ,1 2

C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l ,  M i n o r i t y  Firms on 
Loca l  P u b l i c  Works P r o j e c t s  —
Mixed R e s u l t s  (1979)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2 4 , 2 8 , 3 8

40 ,41
C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l ,  A Look At How The 

Small  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s  
I n v e s t m e n t  Company Program For
A s s i s t i n g  D i s a d v a n t a g e d
Bus inessm en  i s  Working (1975)  ...................  40

Economic R e p o r t  of  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,
1979 ...........................................................................  1 6 ,1 7 ,1 9

2 4 ,2 5 ,3 7

Economic R e p o r t  o f  
1977 . . . . . . . .

t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,
18

Repor t  of  t h e  Task Force  on E d u c a t i o n  
and T r a i n i n g  f o r  M i n o r i t y
B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e  (1974)  ........................... 34

U.S.  Depa r tm en t  o f  Commerce, O f f i c e
o f  M i n o r i t y  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e ,
F e d e r a l  A s s i s t a n c e  Programs f o r
M i n o r i t y  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e s
(1977)  ...........................................................................  34

U.S.  Commission on C i v i l  R i g h t s ,  M i n o r i t i e s  
and Women as Government  C o n t r a c t o r s  
(1975)  ................................................... .......................... 28 ,35

v i



U.S.  Commission on C i v i l  R i g h t s ,  The 
C h a l l e n g e  Ahead: Equa l  Oppor­
t u n i t y  i n  R e f e r r a l  Unions (1976)  ............  37

G. B e n t l e y ,  A H i s t o r y  o f  The F re e d m e n ' s
Bureau  (1955)  ..........................................................  8

T. J e f f e r s o n ,  Manual of  P a r l i a m e n t a r y
P r a c t i c e  (1977)  .............................   29

T. Murphy,  P o l i t i c s  o f  C o n g r e s s i o n a l
Commit tees  (1978)  .................................................   30

R. Nader ,  R u l i n g  C ongress  (1975)  ....................... 30

N. O r n s t e i n ,  Changing C ongre s s :
t h e  Commit tee  System (1974)  .............................  30

P. P i e r c e ,  The F r e e d m e n ' s  Bureau
(1904) ........................................................................... 30

H. R o b e r t ,  Rules  o f  Order  .........................................  30

H. S p e n c e r ,  S o c i a l  S t a t i c s  .....................................  30

J .  t e n B ro e k ,  Equa l  Under Law (1965)  ................  12

New York Times,  J a n u a r y  26, 1977 ........................  20

New York Times,  J a n u a r y  8, 1977 ........................... 20

-  v i  i  -



IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

O c to b e r  Term, 1979 

No. 78-1007

H. EARL FULLILOVE, e t  a l . ,  

Plaintiffs,

v .

JUANITA KREPS, e t  a l .

On W ri t  of  C e r t i o r a r i  t o  t h e  U n i t e d  
S t a t e s  C our t  o f  Appea ls  f o r  the  

Second C i r c u i t

BRIEF OF THE
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL 

FUND, INC.,  THE NATIONAL URBAN 
LEAGUE, INC.,  THE NATIONAL BANKERS 
ASSOCIATION, INC.,  AND THE NATIONAL 

BAR ASSOCIATION, AS AMICI CURIAE

INTEREST OF AMICI

The N.A .A.C .P .  L e ga l  Defense  and E d u c a t i o n a l  

Fund, I n c . ,  i s  a n o n - p r o f i t  c o r p o r a t i o n  e s t a b ­

l i s h e d  u n d e r  t h e  laws of  t h e  S t a t e  o f  New York. 

I t  was formed to  a s s i s t  b l a c k  p e r s o n s  t o  s e c u r e  

t h e i r  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  r i g h t s  by t h e  p r o s e c u t i o n  of  

l a w s u i t s .  I t s  c h a r t e r  d e c l a r e s  t h a t  i t s  p u r p o s e s  

i n c l u d e  r e n d e r i n g  l e g a l  s e r v i c e s  g r a t u i t o u s l y  t o



2

b l a c k  p e r s o n s  s u f f e r i n g  i n j u s t i c e  by r e a s o n  of 

r a c i a l  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n .  For  many y e a r s  a t t o r n e y s  

o f  t h e  L e ga l  D efense  Fund have  r e p r e s e n t e d  p a r t i e s  

i n  l i t i g a t i o n  b e f o r e  t h i s  C o u r t  a nd  t h e  l o w e r  

c o u r t s  i n v o l v i n g  a v a r i e t y  o f  r a c e  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  

i s s u e s  r e g a r d i n g  employment .  See,  e . g . ,  Gr iggs  

v .  Duke Pow er  C o . , 401 U . S .  4 2 4  ( 1 9 7 1 ) ;  A l b e ­

m a r l e  P a pe r  Co. v.  Moody, 422 U.S.  747 (1 9 7 6 ) .  

The L e g a l  D e f e n s e  F und  b e l i e v e s  t h a t  i t s  e x ­

p e r i e n c e  i n  s u c h  l i t i g a t i o n  and  t h e  r e s e a r c h  

i t  has  done w i l l  a s s i s t  t h e  Cour t  i n  t h i s  c a s e .  

The p a r t i e s  h a v e  c o n s e n t e d  t o  t h e  f i l i n g  o f  

t h i s  b r i e f  and l e t t e r s  of  c o n s e n t  have  been  f i l e d  

w i t h  t h e  C l e r k .

The N a t i o n a l  Urban League ,  I n c .  , i s  a c h a r i t ­

a b l e  and e d u c a t i o n a l  o r g a n i z a t i o n  e s t a b l i s h e d  as  a 

n o t - f o r - p r o f i t  c o r p o r a t i o n  u nde r  t h e  laws o f  t h e  

S t a t e  o f  New York.  For  more t h a n  69 y e a r s ,  t h e  

League and i t s  p r e d e c e s s o r s  have  a d d r e s s e d  them­

s e l v e s  t o  t h e  p rob lems o f  d i s a d v a n t a g e d  m i n o r i t i e s  

i n  t h e  U n i t e d  S t a t e s  by i m p r o v i n g  t h e  w o r k i n g  

c o n d i t i o n s  o f  b l a c k s  and o t h e r  m i n o r i t i e s ,  and by 

f o s t e r i n g  b e t t e r  r a c e  r e l a t i o n s  and i n c r e a s i n g  

u n d e r s t a n d i n g  among a l l  p e r s o n s .

The N a t i o n a l  B a n k e r s  A s s o c i a t i o n ,  a n o n ­

p r o f i t  o r g a n i z a t i o n  i n c o r p o r a t e d  i n  1972 unde r  

t h e  laws o f  the  D i s t r i c t  of  Columbia ,  was founded



3

i n  1927 as t h e  N a t i o n a l  Negro Banke rs  A s s o c i a ­

t i o n .  The N a t i o n a l  B a n k e r s  A s s o c i a t i o n  i s  a 

n a t i o n a l  t r a d e  o r g a n i z a t i o n  f o r  m in o r i t y -o w n e d  

and c o n t r o l l e d  b a n k s .  The p u r p o s e s  o f  t h e  

A s s o c i a t i o n  i n c l u d e  s t r e n g t h e n i n g  m i n o r i t y  

f i n a n c i a l  i n s t i t u t i o n s  s o  t h a t  t h e y  c a n ,  i n  

t u r n ,  p r o m o t e  e c o n o m i c  p r o g r e s s  i n  m i n o r i t y  

c o m m u n i t i e s  and  by m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s .  The 

A s s o c i a t i o n  h a s  a p a r t i c u l a r  i n t e r e s t  i n  t h i s  ca se  

b e c a u s e  o f  i t s  p o s s i b l e  impac t  on ongoing  f e d e r a l  

e f f o r t s  t o  i n c r e a s e  government  d e p o s i t s  i n  m in o r ­

i t y  banks .

The N a t i o n a l  B a r  A s s o c i a t i o n  f o u n d e d  i n  

1925, i s  a p r o f e s s i o n a l  membership o r g a n i z a t i o n  

which r e p r e s e n t s  more t h a n  10 ,000  b l a c k  a t t o r n e y s ,  

j u d g e s  a n d  law  s t u d e n t s  i n  t h e  U n i t e d  S t a t e s .  

I t s  p u r p o s e s  i n c l u d e  a c h i e v i n g  e q u a l  o p p o r t u ­

n i t i e s  f o r  m i n o r i t i e s  in  t h e  l e g a l  p r o f e s s i o n ,  

and  p r o t e c t i n g  t h e  c i v i l  a nd  p o l i t i c a l  r i g h t s  

o f  a l l  c i t i z e n s .  The A s s o c i a t i o n  ha s  a p a r t i c u l a r  

i n t e r e s t  i n  t h i s  c a s e  b e c a u s e  of  i t s  b e l i e f  i n  t h e  

im p o r t a n c e  o f  a f f i r m a t i v e  a c t i o n  as a means of  

s o l v i n g  A m e r i c a ' s  r a c i a l  p ro b le m s .  The A s s o c i a ­

t i o n ' s  o f f i c e r s  a r e  R o b e r t  L. H a r r i s  ( P r e s i d e n t ) ,  

W i l l i a m  A. B o r d e r s ,  J r .  ( P r e s i d e n t - E l e c t ) ,  George 

R. B u r r e l l ,  J r .  , W a r r e n  H. Dawson ,  S t u a r t  J .  

Dunnings ,  J r . ,  Renee Jones  Weeks (Vice  P r e s i d e n t s ) ,  
A r n e t t e  R. Hubbard ( S e c r e t a r y )  and A r t h e n i a  L. 

J o y n e r  ( T r e a s u r e r ) .



SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

The u se  o f  r a c i a l  c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s  f o r  b e n ig n  

p u r p o s e s  i s  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y  p e r m i s s i b l e  where i t  

s e r v e s  i m p o r t a n t  p u r p o s e s  and does  no t  r e p r e s e n t  a 

s l u r  o r  s t i g m a  on any g ro u p .  Tha t  c o n s t r u c t i o n  o f  

t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment, advanced  by f o u r  members 

of  t h e  C o u r t  i n  R egen t s  o f  U n i v e r s i t y  o f  C a l i f o r ­

n i a  v .  B a k k e , 438  U . S .  2 6 5 ,  361 ( 1 9 7 8 ) ,  was 

s u p p o r t e d  by two a d d i t i o n a l  J u s t i c e s  in  U n i t e d  

Je w i sh  O r g a n i z a t i o n s  v.  C a r e y , 430 U.S 144, 164 

( 1 9 7 7 ) .  T h i s  s t a n d a r d  i s  c o n s i s t e n t  w i t h  t h e  

l e g i s l a t i v e  h i s t o r y  o f  t h e  Amendment ,  w h i c h  

was framed and app roved  by t h e  same C ongress  t h a t  

a d o p te d  a number o f  r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  laws d e s i g n e d  

t o  a m e l i o r a t e  t h e  c o n d i t i o n  o f  b l a c k s .

The f a c t  t h a t  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  was n o t  

c o n s i d e r e d  d u r i n g  t h e  h e a r i n g s  on t h e  1977 P u b l i c  

Works  A c t  i s  n o t  f a t a l  t o  i t s  v a l i d i t y .  The 

e x i g e n c i e s  o f  t h e  t h e n - e x i s t i n g  economic c i r c u m ­

s t a n c e s  c o m p e l l e d  C o n g r e s s  t o  a c t  w i t h  e x t r a ­

o r d i n a r y  speed  t o  e n a c t  t h e  1977 A c t ,  and p r e ­

c l u d e d  as  a p r a c t i c a l  m a t t e r  i n q u i r y  i n t o  t h e  

e x p e r i e n c e  of  m i n o r i t i e s  u n d e r  t h e  1976 P u b l i c  

Works A c t .  M i n o r i t y  s e t - a s i d e s  were by 1977 a 

r e m e d i a l  d e v ic e  a l r e a d y  i n  use  by and f a m i l i a r  t o  

t h e  f e d e r a l  and s t a t e  gove rnm e n ts .

The d e b a t e s  on t h e  MBE c l a u s e  r e v e a l  t h a t  i t  

was i n t e n d e d  t o  overcome b o t h  p r e s e n t  d i s c r i m i n a ­

t i o n  a n d  t h e  c o n t i n u i n g  e f f e c t s  o f  p a s t  d i s ­



5

c r i m i n a t i o n  a g a i n s t  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  and  

m i n o r i t y  em p loyees .  Each o f  t h e s e  p rob lems had  

been th e  s u b j e c t  o f  r e p e a t e d  and e x h a u s t i v e  p a s t  

c o n g r e s s i o n a l  h e a r i n g s  and r e p o r t s ,  which s u p ­

p o r t e d  t h e  d e c i s i o n  o f  C o n g r e s s .  P r o p o n e n t s  of  

t h e  c l a u s e  a l s o  m a i n t a i n e d  t h a t  i t  a lo n e  would 

s u f f i c e  t o  r e s o l v e  t h e  p rob lem s  w i t h  which i t  was 

c o n c e r n e d .  While  t h i s  c o n c l u s i o n  was not  e s s e n ­

t i a l  t o  t h e  c l a u s e ' s  v a l i d i t y ,  i t  t o o  was f u l l y  

s u p p o r t e d  by p a s t  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  h e a r i n g s  and 

r e p o r t  s .

ARGUMENT

I .  THE APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD

R e s o l u t i o n  o f  t h e  i n s t a n t  c a s e  r e q u i r e s  a 

d e t e r m i n a t i o n  of  t h e  s t a n d a r d  by which t o  measure  

t h e  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i t y  of  a r a c i a l  c l a s s i f i c a t i o n  

e s t a b l i s h e d  f o r  a b e n ig n  r e a s o n .  T h i s  i s s u e  was 

c o n s i d e r e d  b u t  n o t  f i n a l l y  d e c i d e d  i n  R e g e n t s  

of  U n i v e r s i t y  o f  C a l i f o r n i a  v .  Bakke, 438 U.S.  265 

( 1 9 7 8 ) .  I n  Bakke  o n l y  f i v e  members  o f  t h e  

C o u r t  r e a c h e d  t h i s  q u e s t i o n ;  f o u r  e x p r e s s l y  

r e j e c t e d  t h e  t r a d i t i o n a l  s t r i c t  s c r u t i n y  t e s t ,  

h o l d i n g  i n s t e a d  t h a t  such  a c l a s s i f i c a t i o n  need 

on ly  meet  t h r e e  l e s s  s t r i n g e n t  r e q u i r e m e n t s :  (1)

t h e r e  m u s t  be  " a n  i m p o r t a n t  and  a r t i c u l a t e d  

p u r p o se  f o r  i t s  u s e , "  (2 )  i t  must  no t  " s t i g m a t i z e  

any g r o u p , "  (3)  i t  must  no t  " s i n g l [ e ]  o u t  t h o s e



6

l e a s t  w e l l  r e p r e s e n t e d  i n  t h e  p o l i t i c a l  p r o c e s s  t o  

b e a r  t h e  b r u n t  o f  a be n ig n  p r o g r a m . "  438 U.S.  a t  

361 ( o p i n i o n  of  J u s t i c e s  Brennan ,  W hi te ,  M a r s h a l l  

and Blackmun).  The u s u a l  s t r i c t  s c r u t i n y  t e s t  was 

a l s o  r e j e c t e d  by two a d d i t i o n a l  members of  t h e  

C o u r t  i n  U n i t e d  J e w i sh  O r g a n i z a t i o n s  v.  C a r e y , 

430 U.S.  144 ( 1 9 7 7 ) .  P a r t  IV o f  J u s t i c e  W h i t e ’s 

o p i n i o n  i n  t h a t  c a s e ,  w h i c h  was j o i n e d  i n  by 

J u s t i c e s  S t e v e n s  and R e h n q u i s t ,  u p h e ld  as c o n s i s ­

t e n t  w i t h  t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment t h e  r a c e - c o n ­

s c i o u s  d raw ing  o f  d i s t r i c t  l i n e s  so lo n g  as such  a 

p l a n  r e p r e s e n t e d  no " r a c i a l  s l u r  o r  s t i g m a  w i t h  

r e s p e c t  t o  w h i t e s  o r  any o t h e r  r a c e . "  430 U.S.  a t  

165. T h i s  seems i d e n t i c a l  t o  t h e  second  r e q u i r e ­

ment l i s t e d  by t h e  p l u r a l i t y  o p i n i o n  in  Bakke . 

Thus a b e n i g n  r a c i a l  c l a s s i f i c a t i o n  which s a t i s ­

f i e d  t h e  t h r e e  r e q u i r e m e n t s  o f  t h e  Bakke p l u r a l i t y  

w o u l d  a p p e a r  t o  command t h e  s u p p o r t  o f  a s i x -  

member m a j o r i t y  o f  t h e  C o u r t.—
T h i s  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  s t a n d a r d  i s  s t r o n g l y  

s u p p o r t e d  by t h e  l e g i s l a t i v e  h i s t o r y  o f  t h e  

F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment, which we s e t  ou t  a t  l e n g t h

l_/ The s t a n d a r d s  i n  Bakke  and U n i t e d  J e w i s h  
O r g a n i z a t i o n s  a r e  n o t  l i t e r a l l y  t h e  same, a l t h o u g h  
as  a p r a c t i c a l  m a t t e r  a c l a s s i f i c a t i o n  f a i l i n g  t h e  
f i r s t  o r  t h i r d  Bakke r e q u i r e m e n t  would p r o b a b ly  
f a i l  as  w e l l  t h e  U JO t e s t .  The d i s t i n c t i o n  
b e t w e e n  t h e s e  s t a n d a r d s  d o e s  n o t  a f f e c t  t h e  
d i s p o s i t i o n  o f  t h e  i n s t a n t  c a s e ,  and would n o t  
a f f e c t  t h e  v a l i d i t y  o f  t h e  r a c i a l  c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s  
w i th  which we a r e  f a m i l i a r .  A c c o r d in g l y  we t a k e  
no p o s i t i o n  on t h e s e  a l t e r n a t i v e  a r t i c u l a t i o n s  o f  
t h e  u n d e r l y i n g  r u l e .



7

i n  our  b r i e f  amicus c u r i a e  i n  B a k k e See 438 

U .S .  a t  3 9 6 - 9 8  ( M a r s h a l l ,  J . )  T h a t  h i s t o r y  

r e v e a l s  t h a t  t h e  C ong res s  which framed t h e  F o u r ­

t e e n t h  Amendment c o n te m p o ra n e o u s ly  d e b a t e d  and 

o v e r w h e l m i n g l y  a p p r o v e d  a v a r i e t y  o f  p r o g r a m s  

l i m i t e d  t o  b l a c k s ,  and r e g a r d e d  t h e  Amendment as  

p r o v i d i n g  a c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  b a s i s  f o r  such p r o -  

gr  ams.

I n  t h e  y e a r s  i m m e d i a t e l y  p r e c e d i n g  and  

f o l l o w i n g  t h e  f r a m in g  o f  t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment, 

t h e  Congress  which a u t h o r e d  t h a t  p r o v i s i o n  a l s o  

e n a c t e d  a s e r i e s  o f  r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  s o c i a l  p r o ­

grams . The combined impac t  o f  t h e s e  programs was 

f a r  g r e a t e r  t h a n  th e  a f f i r m a t i v e  a c t i o n  m easu res  

which h a v e  come b e f o r e  t h i s  C o u r t .  The r a c i a l  

c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s  i n  t h o s e  n i n e t e e n t h  c e n t u r y  

programs were f a r  more e x c l u s i v e  t h a n  t h e  m easu res  

common t o d a y ;  t h e y  were e i t h e r  l i m i t e d  t o  b l a c k s  

a l o n e ,  o r  i n c l u d e d  w i t h i n  t h e i r  ambit  on ly  b l a c k s

and a n o m i n a l  n u m b er  o f  w h i t e  l o y a l i s t s  who
3/

had f l e d  t h e  S o u t h . — The 1865 F re edm e n 's  Bureau
A 4 /  . . .
Act— e s t a b l i s h e d  th e  Bureau  t o  p r o v i d e  p r o v i s i o n s ,

c l o t h i n g  and  f u e l  f o r  f r e e d m e n ,  t o  l e a s e  and

2 /  B r i e f  of  NAACP Lega l  Defense  and E d u c a t i o n a l  
F u n d ,  I n c .  , a s  Amicus  C u r i a e ,  No. 7 6 - 8 1 1 ,  pp .  
1 0 - 5 3  ( h e r e i n a f t e r  c i t e d  a s  "Amicus  B r i e f " ) .

3 /  Amicus B r i e f  pp. 19-42.

4 /  13 S t a t .  507-508 (1865 ) .



8

u l t i m a t e l y  s e l l  t o  them up t o  40 a c r e s  o f  l a n d ,

a n d  t o  " c o n t r o l  . . .  a l l  s u b j e c t s "  r e l a t i n g  t o

f reedmen .  A l though  t h e  B u r e a u ' s  a u t h o r i t y  a l s o

e x te n d e d  t o  w h i t e  r e f u g e e s ,  n e i t h e r  C o n g re s s —̂ nor
. .  . 6 /
h i s t o r i a n s — r e g a r d e d  t h i s  p r o v i s i o n  as  i m p o r t a n t ,

and t h e  B u r e a u ' s  p r o g ra m s ,  a s  C ong res s  was aware ,

were i n  o p e r a t i o n  u s u a l l y  l i m i t e d  t o  f r e e d m e n .—̂

The 1866 F r e e d m e n ' s  B u r e a u  A c t ,  e n a c t e d  o v e r

P r e s i d e n t  J o h n s o n ' s  v e t o ,  a u t h o r i z e d  e d u c a t i o n a l

programs which were e x p r e s s l y  l i m i t e d  t o  " f r e e d -
„ 8/

men. — I n  1867 C ongres s  a p p r o p r i a t e d  funds " f o r

t h e  r e l i e f  o f  f reedm en  o r  d e s t i t u t e  c o l o r e d  p e o p le
9/m  th e  D i s t r i c t  o f  C o l u m b ia , " — w i t h  no p r o v i s i o n  

f o r  a i d  t o  d e s t i t u t e  w h i t e s .  In  t h e  same y e a r  

Congress  e n a c t e d  t h e  C o l o r e d  S e r v i c e m e n ' s  Claim 

A c t ,  p r o v i d i n g  f o r  b l a c k  v e t e r a n s ,  and f o r  them 

a l o n e ,  s p e c i a l  a s s i s t a n c e  i n  o b t a i n i n g  funds owed 

them by t h e  g o v e rn m e n t.— • The F r e e d m e n ' s  B u r e a u ' s  

programs  f o r  b l a c k s  were u l t i m a t e l y  phased  o u t  by

_5 /  Cong .  G l o b e ,  3 8 t h  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  693
( 1 8 6 4 )  ; s e e  Amicus B r i e f ,  pp.  21-23 .

_6_/ G. B e n t l e y ,  A H i s t o r y  o f  t h e  F r e e d m e n ' s  
Bureau 47 -49  ( 1 9 5 5 ) ;  P. P i e r c e ,  The F re edm e n 's
Bureau 42 -45  (1 9 0 4 ) .

2J H.R. Exec .  Doc. No. 11, 39 th  Cong, 1 s t  S e s s .
( 1 8 6 5 )  .

8 /  14 S t a t .  c .  200, 174-176 ( 1 8 6 6 ) .

9/  15 S t a t .  Res.  4 ,  20 ( 1 8 6 7 ) .

10/  14 S t a t .  Res .  368 (1 8 6 6 ) .



9

C ongress  on t h e  a s s u m p t io n  t h a t  i t s  work would be 

c o n t i n u e d  by t h e  s t a t e s ,  an e x p e c t a t i o n  t h a t  went 

u n f u l f i l l e d  f o r  a c e n t u r y .

The r a c i a l  c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s  i n  t h i s  e a r l y  

l e g i s l a t i o n  d i d  not  go u n n o t i c e d ,  b u t  were the  

s o u r c e  o f  r e p e a t e d  b u t  i n e f f e c t i v e  o p p o s i t i o n  i n  

t h e  C ong res s  and on t h e  p a r t  o f  P r e s i d e n t  J ohnson ,

who tw ice  v e t o e d  t h e  1866 F r e e d m e n ' s  Bureau b i l l
. 11/ . . .on t h a t  b a s i s . —  The a rgum en ts  v o i c e d  m  v a i n

a g a i n s t  t h i s  l e g i s l a t i o n  c l o s e l y  r e s e m b l e  t h e

c o n t e n t i o n s  r a i s e d  a g a i n s t  a f f i r m a t i v e  a c t i o n

programs  i n  our  own t im e .  C h a r a c t e r i z i n g  t h e s e
1 2 /m e a s u r e s  as  " c l a s s  l e g i s l a t i o n " , —  o p p o n e n t s

o b j e c t e d  t h a t  no com parab le  a i d  was b e in g  p ro v id e d
13/

t o  e q u a l l y  needy w h i t e s . —

A p r o p o s i t i o n  to  e s t a b l i s h  a b u r e a u  of  
I r i s h m e n ' s  a f f a i r s ,  a b u r e a u  o f  Dutchmen 's  
a f f a i r s ,  o r  one f o r  t h e  a f f a i r s  o f  t h o s e  of

11/  V I I I  Messages and P a p e rs  of  t h e  P r e s i d e n t s ,  
3610-11 (1914 ) .

12/  See e . g . ,  Cong. Globe ,  39 th  Cong. 1 s t  S e s s . 
37 (1866)  ( rem arks  o f  Congressman L e B l o n d ) ; V I I I  
M e s s a g e s  and  P a p e r s  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t s ,  3623 
( 1 9 1 4 ) ;  Cong .  G l o b e ,  4 0 t h  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  79 
(1867)  ( r e m ark s  of  Sen.  G r im es ) .

13/  See e . g . ,  Cong. Glove 39 th  Cong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  
297 ( re m arks  o f  Sen. S t e w a r t ) ,  319 ( rem arks  o f  
Sen. H e n d r i c k s ) ,  372 ( re m ark s  of  Sen. J o h n s o n ) ,  
372 ( re m ark s  o f  Sen. D a v i s ) ,  401 ( rem arks  o f  Sen. 
McDouga l l ) ,  629 ( re m arks  of  Rep. M a r s h a l l ) ;  App. 
71 ( re m ark s  of  Rep. C h a n l e r )  (1866 ) .



10

C a u c a s i a n  d e s c e n t  g e n e r a l l y ,  who a r e  i n ­
c a p a b l e  of  p r o p e r l y  managing o r  t a k i n g  c a re  
o f  t h e i r  own i n t e r e s t s  by r e a s o n  o f  a n e ­
g l e c t e d  o r  d e f i c i e n t  e d u c a t i o n ,  w o u l d ,  i n  
[ o u r ]  o p i n i o n  . . . ,  b e  l o o k e d  u p o n  a s  t h e  
v a g a ry  o f  a d i s e a s e d  mind.  Why t h e  f reedmen  
o f  A f r i c a n  d e s c e n t  s h o u ld  become t h e  marked 
o b j e c t s  o f  s p e c i a l  l e g i s l a t i o n ,  t o  t h e  
d e t r i m e n t  o f  t h e  u n f o r t u n a t e  w h i t e s ,  [we] 
f a i l  t o  comprehend .  14/

I t  was u r g e d  t h a t  such programs would u l t i m a t e l y

p r o v e  h a r m f u l  t o  b l a c k s ,  e i t h e r  by i n c r e a s i n g

t h e i r  dependence—- ^ o r  by p r o v o k in g  w h i t e  r e s e n t -  
16/

m e n t .—  Taxing  w h i t e s  t o  s u p p o r t  programs a i d -
17/m g  on ly  b l a c k s  was c r i t i c i z e d  as u n f a i r , —  and

as g i v i n g  b l a c k s  an u n f a i r  c o m p e t i t i v e  a d v a n ta g e  
18/o v e r  w h i t e s . —

P r o p o n e n t s  o f  such  r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  l e g i s l a ­

t i o n ,  h o w e v e r ,  s u c c e s s f u l l y  a r g u e d  t h a t  s u c h  

r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  l e g i s l a t i o n  was j u s t i f i e d  by th e

14/  H. R. Rep. No. 2 ,  38 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s . 2, 4 
(1 8 6 4 ) .

1 5 /  Cong .  G l o b e ,  3 9 t h  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  401 
TFemarks of  Sen.  McDougal l )  ( 1 8 6 6 ) .

1_6_/ Id_. a t  App. 69-70  ( re m arks  o f  Rep. R o u s s e a u ) .

1 7 / I d . a t  362 ( r e m a r k s  o f  Sen .  S a u l s b u r y ) ,
634,  635 ( rem arks  o f  Rep. R i t t e r ) ;  App. 83 ( r e ­
marks of  Rep.  C h a n l e r ) .

18/  "Mr. S p e a k e r ,  when I  was a boy,  and in  common 
w i t h  a l l  o t h e r  K e n t u c k y  b o y s  was b r o u g h t  i n  
company w i t h  n e g r o e s ,  we u se d  t o  t a l k ,  as t o  any 
p r o j e c t ,  a b o u t  h a v in g  ' a  w h i t e  m an 's  c h a n c e . '  I t  
seems t o  me now t h a t  a man may be v e r y  happy  i f  he 
can g e t  ' a  n e g r o ' s  c h a n c e . ' "  Id .



11

s p e c i a l  needs  o f  b l a c k s —  and i n  t h e  long t e r m
r . 20 /i n t e r e s t  o f  a l l  c i t i z e n s . —  They e m p h a s i z e d  

t h a t  t h o s e  s p e c i a l  needs  were t h e  r e s u l t  o f  a long

h i s t o r y  o f  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n ,  and t h a t  t h e  a i d  would
2 2 /h e l p  b l a c k s  t o  become s e l f - s u p p o r t i n g . —  A 

d i s t i n c t i o n  was drawn be tw een  such b e n ig n  r a c e ­

c o n s c i o u s  m e a s u r e s  and i n v i d i o u s  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n .

One o b j e c t  o f  t h i s  b i l l  i s  t o  a m e l i o r a t e  
t h e  c o n d i t i o n  o f  t h e  c o l o r e d  men . . . .  [ I t s  
op p o n e n t s  a s s e r t ]  t h e  b i l l  p r o v i d e s  one law 
f o r  o n e  c l a s s  o f  m e n ,  a n d  a n o t h e r  f o r  
a n o t h e r  c l a s s .  The v e ry  o b j e c t  o f  t h e  b i l l  
i s  t o  b r e a k  down t h e  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  be tween  
w h i t e s  and b l a c k s .  T h e r e f o r e  I r e p e a t  t h a t  
t h e  t r u e  o b j e c t  of  t h i s  b i l l  i s  t h e  a m e l i o r a ­
t i o n  o f  t h e  c o n d i t i o n  o f  t h e  c o l o r e d  p e o p l e .  23 /

1 9 /  S e e ,  e . g . ,  i_d_. a t  365 ( r e m a r k s  o f  Sen .
F e s s e n d e n ) ,  568 ( re m arks  of  Rep. D o n n e l l y ) ;  App. 
75 ( re m ark s  o f  Rep. P h e l p s ) .

20 /  See e . g . ,  Cong. Globe,  4 0 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  
444 ( re m ark s  of  Rep. S c o f i e l d )  ( 1 8 6 7 ) .

21 /  See e . g . ,  Cong. Globe,  39 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  
322 ( re m ark s  o f  Sen. F e s s e n d e n  and Sen. T rum bu l l )  
("We s h a l l  no t  long  have  to  s u p p o r t  any o f  t h e s e  
b l a c k s  o u t  of  t h e  p u b l i c  T r e a s u r y  i f  we e d u c a t e  
and f u r n i s h  them w i t h  l a n d  upon which th e y  can 
make a l i v i n g  f o r  t h e m s e l v e s . " )  (1866) .

2 2 /  S e e ,  e . g . ,  i d . a t  589 ( r e m a r k s  o f  Sen .  
D o n n e l l y ) ,  630 ( re m arks  of  Rep. Hubbard) .

2 3 /  I d . a t  6 3 1 - 3 2  ( r e m a r k s  o f  R ep .  M o u l t o n ) .



12

This  d i s t i n c t i o n  was a p p a r e n t l y  a c c e p t e d  by th e  

m a j o r i t y  o f  C o n g r e s s ,  which c o n s i s t e n t l y  v o t e d  t o  

a d o p t  such  r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  l e g i s l a t i o n .

The F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment was f a s h i o n e d  and 

app roved  by t h e  same C ongres s  which had c o n s i s ­

t e n t l y  a d o p te d  l e g i s l a t i o n  w i t h  such " a m e l i o r a ­

t i v e "  r a c i a l  c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s .  The Amendment was 

a d o p t e d  i n  p a r t  t o  r e m o v e  d o u b t s  a s  t o  t h e

c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i t y  o f  t h e  F r e e d m e n ' s  B u r e a u  
24 /

b i l l s , —  which P r e s i d e n t  Johnson  had a rg u e d  e x -
25/ceeded  t h e  a u t h o r i t y  o f  C o n g r e s s . —  The F r e e d ­

m e n ' s  B u r e a u  A c t  o f  1 8 6 6 ,  t h e  R e c o n s t r u c t i o n  

m e a s u r e  w h i c h  p r o b a b l y  c o n t a i n e d  t h e  m o s t  im­

p o r t a n t  r a c e - s p e c i f i c  p r o v i s i o n s ,  was c o n s i d e r e d

and a p p ro v e d  by C ongres s  s i m u l t a n e o u s l y  w i th  t h e
2 6 /

F o u r t e e n t h  A m e n d m e n t .—  The  same l e g i s l a t o r s

24 /  J .  t e n B r o e k ,  Equa l  Under  Law 201,  203 (1 9 6 5 ) ;  
Cong. G lobe ,  39 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  1088 ( rem arks  
o f  Rep. W oodbr idge ) ,  1092 ( re m ark s  of  Rep. Bing­
ham) ( 1 8 6 6 ) .

25 /  V I I I  Messages and P a p e rs  of  t h e  P r e s i d e n t s  
3599 (1 9 1 4 ) .

26 /  The House p a s s e d  th e  Amendment on May 10, 
1866,  t h e  S e n a te  v o t e d  a m o d i f i e d  v e r s i o n  on June  
8, 1866, and th e  House a c q u i e s c e d  i n  t h e  S e n a te
c h a n g e s  on J u n e  13 ,  18 6 6 .  Cong .  G l o b e ,  3 9 t h
Cong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  2545,  3042, 3149 (1866 ) .  The
House a pproved  t h e  F r e e d m e n ' s  Bureau  Act  on May 
29, 1866, t h e  S e n a t e  v o t e d  a m o d i f i e d  v e r s i o n  on
J u n e  26 ,  1 8 6 6 ,  and t h e  C o n f e r e n c e  R e p o r t  was
a c c e p t e d  on J u l y  2 and 3, 1866. I d . ,  a t  2773,



13

who c om pr i se d  t h e  t w o - t h i r d s  m a j o r i t y  n e c e s s a r y  t o  

o v e r r i d e  P r e s i d e n t  J o h n s o n ' s  second  v e t o  o f  t h e  

F r e e d m e n ' s  Bureau  b i l l  a l s o  com pr i sed  th e  two-  

t h i r d s  m a j o r i t y  t h a t  a p p r o v e d  t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  

Amendment. Of t h e  33 S e n a t o r s  and 104 R e p r e s e n t a ­

t i v e s  who v o te d  to  o v e r r i d e  t h a t  v e t o ,  e v e r y  one

who was p r e s e n t  f o r  t h e  v o t e  a l s o  s u p p o r t e d  the
2 7 /

F o u r t e e n t h  A m e n d m e n t .—  C o n g r e s s m a n  S t e v e n s ,  

i n t r o d u c i n g  t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment t o  t h e  House, 

d e s c r i b e d  i t s  b a s i c  p u r p o s e  a s  p r o v i d i n g  f o r  

" t h e  a m e l i o r a t i o n  o f  t h e  c o n d i t i o n  of  t h e  f r e e d -
men., , 2 8 /

T h e s e  w e r e  t h e  e x a c t  w ords  u s e d  o n l y

t h r e e  months e a r l i e r  t o  d e s c r i b e  t h e  F re ed m e n ' s  
29 /

Bureau b i l l .  T h i s  i d e n t i t y  o f  p h r a s i n g  u n d e r ­

l i n e s  t h e  p e r c e i v e d  c o m p a t i b i l i t y  o f  t h e  two 

m e a s u r e s .  The s u p p o r t e r s  of  t h e  Act and Amendment 

r e g a r d e d  them as  bo th  c o n s i s t e n t  and compl imen­

t a r y ,  w h i l e  opponen ts  viewed t h e  two, t o g e t h e r  

w i th  t h e  C i v i l  R i g h t s  Act of  1866, as p a r t  o f  a

26/  c o n t ' d .

3413,  3524, 3562. On s e v e r a l  o c c a s i o n s  t h e  Act
was b e in g  d e b a t e d  i n  one h o u s e  a t  t h e  same t ime 
t h e  Amendment was b e i n g  d e b a t e d  i n  t h e  o t h e r .  
See, e . g ,  i d .  a t  2799, 2807, 2869, 2977.

27 /  I d .  a t  3042, 3149,  3842, 3850.

28/  I d .  a t  2459.

29 /  See p. 11, s u p r a .



-  14 -

s i n g l e  c o h e r e n t ,  t hough  in  t h e i r  v iew u n d e s i r e -
, ,  . .  30 /a b l e ,  p o l i c y . —

The T h i r t y - N i n t h  C o n g r e s s ,  w h i c h  was w e l l  

aware o f  t h e  r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  rem ed ies  and l i m i t a ­

t i o n s  c o n t a i n e d  i n  t h e  F r e e d m e n ' s  Bureau  b i l l s  i t  

p a s s e d  i n  F e b r u a r y  and J u l y  o f  1866, c a n n o t  c on ­

c e i v a b l y  h a v e  i n t e n d e d  by i t s  a p p r o v a l  o f  t h e  

F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment  on J u n e  12 ,  1 8 6 6 ,  t o  i n ­

v a l i d a t e  o r  f o r b i d  such  r e m e d i e s .  The d e b a t e s  

i n  t h a t  C ongress  have  an u n c a n n i l y  modern t o n e ;  

t h e  o p p o s i t i o n  t o  r a c e - s p e c i f i c  r e m e d i e s  was 

e x p r e s s e d  i n  much t h e  same t e rm s  as  t h e  contempo­

r a r y  a r g u m e n t s  a g a i n s t  m e a s u r e s  s u c h  as  t h e  

m i n o r i t y  s e t - a s i d e  p rogram. But t h e  f r a m er s  of  

t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment c l e a r l y  r e g a r d e d  i t  as 

n o t  m e r e ly  p e r m i t t i n g ,  b u t  a f f i r m a t i v e l y  a u t h o r i z ­

in g  such  p rogram s.  Many o f  t h e  r a c e - c o n s c i o u s  

p r o v i s i o n s  a d o p t e d  d e a l t  w i t h  t h e  p r o b l e m s  o f  

b l a c k  f a r m e r s ,  t h e  most  i m p o r t a n t  group o f  m in o r ­

i t y  b u s in e s s m e n  i n  n i n e t e e n t h  c e n t u r y  America.  In 

a s s e s s i n g  t h a t  a m e l i o r a t i v e  l e g i s l a t i o n ,  t h e  

T h i r t y - N i n t h  C o ngre s s  a p p l i e d  no s p e c i a l  s t r i n g e n t  

s t a n d a r d ,  b u t  i n q u i r e d  o n l y  w h e t h e r  i t  was r e a s o n ­

a b ly  c a l c u l a t e d  t o  s e r v e  an a m e l i o r a t i v e  p u r p o s e .  

Tha t  i s  t h e  s t a n d a r d  which t h i s  C our t  s h o u ld  app ly

3 0 /  Cong .  G l o b e ,  3 9 t h  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  2501 
( r e m a r k s  o f  Rep .  S h a n k l i n ) ,  2 5 3 7 - 8  ( r e m a r k s  
of  Rep. R o g e r s ) ,  2941 ( re m ark s  of  Sen. H e n d r i c k s ) ;  
App. 239-40  ( rem arks  of  Sen.  D a v i s ) .



15

in  a s s e s s i n g  t h e  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l i t y  o f  such  meas ­

u r e s  .

1 1 • the o r i g i n  of the mbe p r o v is io n

The p e t i t i o n e r s  fo c u s  t h e i r  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  

a t t a c k  on the  MBE p r o v i s i o n  on the  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  

p r o c e s s e s  l e a d i n g  t o  i t s  a d o p t i o n ,  c l a i m i n g  t h a t  

t h e  l a c k  o f  h e a r i n g s  on t h i s  p r o v i s i o n  i s  u n j u s t i ­

f i a b l e  and v i r t u a l l y  f a t a l  t o  i t s  v a l i d i t y .  They 

r e g a r d  t h e  a d o p t i o n  of  t h a t  m easu re  i n  1977 on t h e  

f l o o r s  o f  t h e  House and S e n a t e  as  i n e x p l i c a b l e  and 

h a s t y ,  r e p r e s e n t i n g  m ere ly  a s e i z u r e  o f  f e d e r a l  

funds f o r  t h e  b l a c k  community t o  which t h e  m a j o r ­

i t y  o f  C ongress  i n c o m p r e h e n s i b l y ,  and e r r o n e o u s l y ,  

a g r e e d .  We s u g g e s t  t h a t  t h e  a c t u a l  o r i g i n  o f  t h e  

MBE p r o v i s i o n  i s  somewhat d i f f e r e n t .  In  a d o p t i n g  

th e  1977 A c t ,  Congress  was r e q u i r e d  t o  a c t  w i th  

e x t r a o r d i n a r y  s p e e d  t o  d e a l  w i t h  t h e  c r i t i c a l  

e c o n o m i c  s i t u a t i o n .  H e a r i n g s  c o n c e r n i n g  t h e  

e x p e r i e n c e  o f  m i n o r i t i e s  u n d e r  t h e  1976 Act  were 

n o t  p o s s i b l e  b e c a u s e  i m p l e m e n t a t i o n  o f  t h a t  

s t a t u t e  was on ly  j u s t  b e g i n n i n g .  Congress  a c t e d  

r e a s o n a b l y  i n  c h o o s in g  a s e t - a s i d e  p r o v i s i o n ,  an 

e s t a b l i s h e d  f e d e r a l  and s t a t e  d e v i c e ,  t o  d e a l  w i t h  

t h e  w e l l - k n o w n  g e n e r a l  p r o b l e m s  o f  m i n o r i t y  

c o n t r a c t o r s .
The P u b l i c  Works A c t s  o f  1976 and 1977 were 

a d o p te d  t o  a d d r e s s  problems c r e a t e d  by t h e  r e c e s -



16

s i o n  w h i c h  b e g a n  i n  1 9 7 4 ,  t h e  w o r s t  e c o n o m i c

d o w n t u r n  w h i c h  t h e  c o u n t r y  ha d  s u f f e r e d  i n

t h e  p a s t  40  y e a r s .  F o l l o w i n g  t h e  l i f t i n g  o f

w a g e - p r i c e  c o n t r o l s ,  and s p u r r e d  by t h e  d r a m a t i c

i n c r e a s e  i n  o i l  p r i c e s  i n  e a r l y  1974, t h e  a n n u a l

i n f l a t i o n  r a t e  of  t h e  consumer p r i c e  i n d e x  r o s e
f r o m  3.4% i n  1972 t o  8 .8% i n  1973 and  12.2% 

31 /
m  1974.  The F e d e r a l  R e s e rv e  Board ,  w i th  t h e

s u p p o r t  of  t h e  a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ,  r a i s e d  th e  d i s c o u n t

r a t e  f rom 4.5% i n  1972 t o  7.8% i n  1974, i n  t h e

h o p e  o f  c o o l i n g  o f f  t h e  e c o n o m y . —  T h i s  i n

t u r n  c aused  t h e  pr ime r a t e  t o  r i s e  i n  t h e  same

p e r i o d  from 5.25% t o  t h e  t h e n  u n h e a rd  o f  l e v e l  o f  
3 3 /

1 0 .8 1 % .  • T h i s  g r e a t l y  i n c r e a s e d  t h e  c o s t  o f

b o r ro w in g ,  s low ing  down c a p i t a l  i n v e s t m e n t ,  which 

f e l l  12% i n  r e a l  t erms  in  1974 .—  H ig h e r  i n t e r e s t  

r a t e s ,  t o g e t h e r  w i th  t h e  r e d u c t i o n  in  bank d e ­

p o s i t s  due t o  t h e  h i g h e r  r a t e s  of  r e t u r n  a v a i l a b l e

e l s e w h e r e ,  r e d u c e d  h o u s i n g  s t a r t s  by 34% i n  t h a t  
3 5 /

y e a r .  T h e s e  e v e n t s  c o m b i n e d  t o  p r o d u c e  i n  

1974 a r e d u c t  i o n  in  the  g r o s s  n a t i o n a l  p r o d u c t ,

31/ Economic R epor t  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,  1979, p.
244. The s ame d a t a  can be found  i n  e d i t i o n s  from
1975 throu ;gh 1978.

32/ I d . p . 258 •

33/ I d .

34/ I d .  p . 235

35/  I d .  p. 224.



17

and an i n c r e a s e  i n  t h e  unemployment  r a t e  f rom 4.9%
„ - 36/t o  5 .6%.—

By J a n u a r y  o f  1 9 7 6 ,  t h e s e  e c o n o m i c  and

f i s c a l  p o l i c i e s  had r ed u c e d  t h e  i n f l a t i o n  r a t e
37/

from 12.2% t o  7.0%,—  bu t  the  unemployment  r a t e

f o r  1975 had r i s e n  t o  8.5% and 7 . 8  m i l l i o n  pe o p le  
r 38/

were ou t  o f  w o r k ,—  a lm o s t  t w i c e  as  many as  m  

1973.  Unemployment b e n e f i t s  i n  1975 had t o t a l e d  

$16 .8  b i l l i o n ,  and were on t h e  v e r g e  o f  b a n k r u p t ­

in g  s e v e r a l  s t a t e  unemployment a g e n c i e s .  I n  t h e s e  

d i f f i c u l t  c i r c u m s t a n c e s  a d e b a t e  b e g a n  a s  t o  

w h e t h e r  f e d e r a l  p o l i c i e s  s h o u ld  c o n t i n u e  to  focus  

on t h e  p r o b l e m  o f  i n f l a t i o n ,  a t  t h e  r i s k  o f  

c o n t i n u i n g  t h e  r e c e s s i o n ,  o r  s h o u l d  e m p h a s i z e  

i n s t e a d  s t i m u l a t i n g  t h e  economy and r e d u c i n g  

u n e m p l o y m e n t .  The P r e s i d e n t  u r g e d  t h e  f o r m e r  

a p p ro a c h ,  w h i l e  a m a j o r i t y  o f  Congress  s u p p o r t e d  

t h e  l a t t e r .  To implement  i t s  p r e f e r r e d  p o l i c y  

Congress  began  work on a p u b l i c  works program, 
w h i c h  w o u l d  i n j e c t  a d d i t i o n a l  f u n d s  i n t o  t h e  

economy and which p e r m i t t e d  t h e  f o c u s i n g  o f  t h o s e  

funds  on t h e  c o n s t r u c t i o n  i n d u s t r y ,  p a r t i c u a r l y  

h a r d  h i t  by t h e  r e c e s s i o n .  C ongress  a d o p te d  i n
J u l y 1976, o v e r  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ' s  v e t o ,  t h e  Loca l

36/ I d . P- 217.

37 / I d . P- 244.

38/  I d .  pp.  216, 221.



18

P u b l i c  Works C a p i t a l  Deve lopment  and I n v e s t m e n t  

Act  o f  1976.  90 S t a t .  889.  The 1976 Act manda ted

t h e  g r a n t i n g  o f  $2 b i l l i o n  i n  a i d  t o  s t a t e  and 

l o c a l  g o v e r n m e n t s .  The  e f f e c t i v e n e s s  o f  t h i s  

p rogram  r e q u i r e d  t h a t  t h e  funds  be s p e n t  imme­

d i a t e l y ,  w h i l e  t h e  economy was s t i l l  s t r u g g l i n g  t o  

p u l l  o u t  of  t h e  r e c e s s i o n ,  and t h a t  t h e y  be  s p e n t  

o v e r  a s h o r t  p e r i o d  o f  t ime  so as  n o t  t o  d i s s i p a t e  

t h e i r  s t i m u l a t i v e  e f f e c t .  C o n g r e s s  t h e r e f o r e  

r e q u i r e d  t h e  Economic Development  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n  

("EDA") t o  p u b l i s h  im p le m e n t in g  r e g u l a t i o n s  w i t h i n  

30 d a y s ,  42 U . S . C .  § 6 7 0 6 ,  an d  t o  a c t  on any 

a p p l i c a t i o n  w i t h i n  60 d a y s ,  42 U .S .C .  § 6706, and 

p r o v i d e d  t h a t  any p r o j e c t  f o r  which funds were 

awarded  must  b e g i n  w i t h i n  90 days  of  EDA a p p r o v a l ,  

42 U .S .C .  867 0 5 (d).— '
The economic s i t u a t i o n  c o n f r o n t i n g  t h e  incom­

in g  a d m i n i s t r a t i o n  i n  J a n u a r y ,  1977, was even  more 

complex .  The unemployment r a t e  i n  December,  1976 

was 7.8%, t h e  same l e v e l  as J a n u a r y ,  1976, and

h i g h e r  t h a n  t h e  7.3% r a t e  r e a c h e d  i n  May o f  t h a t
4 0 /  m

y e a r . —  The g r o s s  n a t i o n a l  p r o d u c t ,  which had

3 9 /  F u n d i n g  was a l s o  a v a i l a b l e  f o r  p r o j e c t s  
f u n d e d  i n  p a r t  by o t h e r  f e d e r a l  l a w s  i f  t h o s e  
o t h e r  funds  were a v a i l a b l e  " i m m e d i a t e l y . "  42 U.S .C .  
§ 6 7 0 3 .  The f u n d i n g  o f  p r o j e c t s  j o i n t l y  w i t h  
s t a t e  or  l o c a l  c o n t r i b u t i o n s  was p e r m i t t e d  on ly  i f  
t h e  needed  c o n t r i b u t i o n s  were a v a i l a b l e  "imme­
d i a t e l y . "  42 U .S .C .  § 6704.

4 0 /  Economic R e p o r t  o f  the  P r e s i d e n t ,  1977, p.
2 2 1 .



19

i n c r e a s e d  a t  a h e a l t h y  9.2% a n n u a l  r a t e  d u r i n g  t h e

f i r s t  q u a r t e r  o f  1976, had r i s e n  on ly  3.0% d u r i n g
4 1 /

t h e  l a s t  q u a r t e r . —  The C o u n c i l  o f  E c o n o m ic

A d v i s o r s  c o n c lu d e d  t h a t  t h e  d e c l i n e  o f  t h e  GNP

growth  r a t e  was t h e  r e s u l t  in  p a r t  o f  s l u g g i s h

s p e n d in g  by f e d e r a l ,  s t a t e  and l o c a l  g ove rnm e n ts ;

g o v e r n m e n t  p u r c h a s e s  i n  c o n s t a n t  d o l l a r s  h a d

f a l l e n  4.9% d u r i n g  t h e  f i r s t  q u a r t e r ,  a n d  h a d
4 2 /

r i s e n  on ly  0.4% o v e r  t h e  e n t i r e  y e a r . — ' The i n ­

f l a t i o n  r a t e  had f a l l e n  c o n s i d e r a b l y ,  f rom 7.0% i n
43 /D e c e m b e r ,  1975 t o  4 .8%  i n  D e c e m b e r ,  1 9 7 6 . —  

Under  t h e s e  c i r c u m s t a n c e s  t h e  new a d m i n i s t r a ­

t i o n ,  which had b e e n  e l e c t e d  on a p l a t f o r m  p l a c i n g  

u n e m p l o y m e n t  a h e a d  o f  i n f l a t i o n  as  i t s  f i r s t  

p r i o r i t y ,  d e c i d e d  t h a t  s t r o n g  m e a s u r e s  w e r e  

n e c e s s a r y  t o  s t i m u l a t e  t h e  economy. I t  was a l s o  

aware ,  however ,  a s  was C o n g r e s s ,  t h a t  t ime was of  

t h e  e s s e n c e ;  i f  a d d i t i o n a l  f e d e r a l  sp e n d in g  were 

t o  h a v e  t h e  d e s i r e d  e f f e c t ,  i t  h a d  t o  o c c u r  

w h i l e  t h e  economy was s t i l l  i n  i t s  t h e n  s l u g g i s h  

c o n d i t i o n .  I f  t h e  funds  were n o t  a c t u a l l y  

expended  u n t i l  a f t e r  a h e a l t h y  growth r a t e  had

41 /  I d .  p. 59.

4 2 /  Economic R e p o r t  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,  1979, p. 
244.  The 1977 Act  had found  t h a t  r educ e d  s t a t e  
and l o c a l  government  s p e n d in g  t e n d e d  " t o  u n d e r ­
mine t h e  F e d e r a l  G ove rnm e n t 's  e f f o r t s  t o  s t i m u l a t e  
t h e  economy."  42 U.S .C .  § 6721.

4 3 /  Id .



-  20

begun,  t h o s e  f u n d s ,  f a r  f rom h e l p i n g  t h e  economy, 

w o u l d  t e n d  t o  o v e r h e a t  i t  and  c a u s e  i n c r e a s e d  

i n f l a t i o n .

A c c o r d i n g l y ,  b o t h  t h e  incoming a d m i n i s t r a t i o n  

and  t h e  C o n g r e s s  a c t e d  w i t h  u n p r e c e d e n t e d  b u t  

e s s e n t i a l  s p e e d .  On J a n u a r y  4, 1977, Congressman 

Roe, c h a i rm a n  o f  t h e  Economic Development  Subcom­

m i t t e e  o f  t h e  House  P u b l i c  Works C o m m i t t e e ,

i n t r o d u c e d  H 7 8 ,  c a l l i n g  f o r  a n  a d d i t i o n a l  $4
4 4 /b i l l i o n  i n  p u b l i c  w o r k s  e x p e n d i t u r e s . —  On 

J a n u a r y  7,  1 9 7 7 ,  t h e  P r e s i d e n t - e l e c t  m e t  w i t h  

c o n g r e s s i o n a l  l e a d e r s  and a g r e e d  upon an economic 

s t i m u l u s  package  t h a t  i n c l u d e d  t h a t  $4 b i l l i o n  f o r

e m e r g e n c y  p u b l i c  w o r k s .
4 5 /

A s i m i l a r  b i l l  was

i n t r o d u c e d  i n  t h e  S e n a te  on J a n u a r y  25 by S e n a t o r  
46 /

Randolph .  The d e t a i l s  o f  t h e  a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s
4 7 /p r o p o s a l s  becam e  known t h e  n e x t  d a y . —  On 

J a n u a r y  27, t h e  S e c r e t a r y  o f  t h e  T r e a s u r y  t e s t i ­

f i e d  i n  s u p p o r t  o f  t h e  s t i m u l u s  package ,  u r g i n g  

t h a t  t h e  f u n d s  s h o u l d  be  s p e n t  " a s  q u i c k l y  as  

good management a l l o w s "  and t h a t  " speed  i s  c l e a r l y

44 /
1977)

123 Cong. Rec. H 78 ( d a i l y  ed . J a n u a r y  4,

45 / New York Times, J a n u a r y  8, 1977, 1 : 5 ,  6 : 3 .

46 /
1977)

123 Cong. Rec. S 1349 ( d a i l y  ed. J a n u a r y  25,

4 7 / New York T i m e s ,  J a n u a r y  26 , 1 9 7 7 ,  1 : 6 .



21

o f  t h e  e s s e n c e . " —  The P r e s i d e n t ' s  Message on 

t h e  Economic Recovery  Act s t r e s s e d  " t h e  need  f o r

an im m edia te  s t i m u l u s  to  government  p u r c h a s i n g
4 9 /  5 0 /p o w e r "  and  u r g e d  " p r o m p t "  a c t i o n . —  H o u s e —  

an d  S e n a t e —  ̂ h e a r i n g s  on t h e  p r o p o s a l s  w e re  

c o m p l e t e d  on F e b r u a r y  4 ,  1 9 7 7 ,  b a r e l y  a mon th

a f t e r  t h e  p r o p o s a l  was i n t r o d u c e d  i n  t h e  House, 

and on ly  10 days  a f t e r  i t s  i n t r o d u c t i o n  i n  t h e  

S e n a t e .  The House r e p o r t  was i s s u e d  on F e b r u a r y  

16 ,1 977 ,  and t h e  b i l l  r e a c h e d  t h e  f l o o r  and was

4 8 /

p a s s e d  on F e b r u a r y  24 ,  1 9 7 7 .
5 2 /

The S e n a t e

R e p o r t  was r e l e a s e d  on M arch  4 ,  1 9 7 7 ,  and  t h e
53/

S e n a te  app ro v e d  t h e  b i l l  6 days  l a t e r . —

4 8 /  H e a r in g s  on t h e  Conduct  o f  Monetary P o l i c y  
B e fo re  t h e  House Commit tee  on Banking ,  F in a n c e  
and Urban A f f a i r s ,  95 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  3, 12
(1977 ) .

4 9 /  H. Doc.  9 5 - 6 8  9 5 t h  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  1 2 3 ;  
Cong. Rec.  H 653 ( d a i l y  ed .  Feb.  1, 1977) .

50 /  H. Rep. 95-20 ,  p. 2 (1977) .

51 /  S. Rep. 95 -38 .  (1 9 7 7 ) .  The r e p o r t  s t a t e d
t h a t  t h e  Funds  w e r e  " u r g e n t l y  n e e d e d . "  I d . 
p . 3.

52 /  123 Cong. Rec.  H 1401-H 1462 ( d a i l y  e d . , Feb.
2 4 ,1 9 7 7 ) .

53 /  123 Cong. Rec. S3851-S3928 ( d a i l y  ed .  March
10, 1977) .



22

In  u r g i n g  q u i c k  p a s s a g e  o f  t h e  b i l l  S e n a t o r

Randolph  e x p l a i n e d :

The  t i m i n g  o f  p u b l i c  w o r k s  p r o j e c t s ,  o f  
c o u r s e ,  i s  v e r y  i m p o r t a n t .  T he re  a r e  economic 
peaks  and v a l l e y s  i n  Am erica ,  which we c a l l  
r e c e s s i o n  or  d e p r e s s i o n  . . .  Today . . .  we have  
unemployment  of  p e r h a p s  8 m i l l i o n  p e o p l e .  We 
now u n d e r s t a n d  t h a t  t h e s e  t y p e s  o f  p u b l i c  
works p r o j e c t s  do much t o  o f f s e t  t h e  f l u c t u a ­
t i o n  o f  b u s i n e s s  c y c l e s .  We n e e d  t h i s  
l e g i s l a t i o n  now, b e c a u s e  i n  m o s t  o f  o u r  
c o u n t r y ,  a t  l e a s t  a c o n s i d e r a b l e  p o r t i o n ,  t h e  
s p r i n g  i s  t h e  t ime  when t h e s e  p r o j e c t s  can 
g e t  underw ay .  We do n o t  want  t o  w a i t  u n t i l  
t h e  m id d l e  o f  t h e  summer and l e t  t h e  f a l l  and 
t h e  c o l d e r  months o f  t h e  y e a r  a p p ro a c h  a g a i n .  
We want t h e  b e g i n n i n g  of  t h e s e  p r o j e c t s  i n  
w h a t  I  c a l l  t h e  c o n s t r u c t i o n  s e a s o n .  5 4 /

Congressman Roe c a l l e d  f o r

[ p ] r o m p t  e n a c t m e n t  [ t o ]  e n a b l e  t h e  EDA t o  
i m m e d ia te ly  r e l e a s e  t h e  a d d i t i o n a l  funds f o r  
t h o s e  a p p l i c a t i o n s  a l r e a d y  on f i l e ,  and put  
ou r  p e o p l e  back  t o  work . . . .  [T]he  Commit tee  
. . . v e r y  c a r e f u l l y  d e s i g n e d  t h i s  program so 
t h a t  i t  c o u ld  be implem ented  as  e f f i c i e n t l y  
and e x p e d i t i o u s l y  as  p o s s i b l e ,  a v o i d i n g  t h e  
l o n g  l a g  t i m e  s o m e t i m e s  a s s o c i a t e d  w i t h  
p u b l i c  works c o n s t r u c t i o n .  We d e s i g n e d  t h i s  
program t o  have  an immed ia te  a n t i - r e c e s s i o n -  
a ry  impact  on t h e  economy.  55/

54 /  123 Cong. Rec.  S3858 ( d a i l y  ed .  March 10,
1977) .

55 /  123 Cong. Rec. H 1401 ( d a i l y  ed .  Feb.  24,
1977) .



23

In s i g n i n g  t h e  1977 P u b l i c  Works Act t h e  P r e s i ­

d e n t  e m phas ized  t h a t  i t  would p r o v i d e  " im m ed ia te  

f u n d i n g "  f o r  c o n s t r u c t i o n  p r o j e c t s . ——̂

I t  was i n  t h e  c o n t e x t  of  t h i s  w i d e ly  r e c o g ­

n i z e d  n e e d  f o r  e x t r a o r d i n a r i l y  p r o m p t  a c t i o n ,  

r e s u l t i n g  i n  t h e  e na c tm e n t  o f  a m a jo r  p i e c e  of 

l e g i s l a t i o n  w i t h  v i r t u a l l y  u n p r e c e d e n t e d  b u t  

c l e a r l y  e s s e n t i a l  s p e e d ,  t h a t  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  

was a d d e d  t o  t h e  b i l l .  U n d e r  t h e  1976 P u b l i c

Works Act  t h e  f i r s t  g r a n t s  were on ly  announced on
5 7 /

D e c e m b e r  26 ,  1 9 7 6 . —  The House  and  S e n a t e  

h e a r i n g s  h e l d  b a r e l y  a month l a t e r  d e a l t  a lm o s t  

e x c l u s i v e l y  w i t h  t h e  f o rm u la s  and c r i t e r i a  u s e d  t o  

p i c k  t h e  p r o j e c t s  chosen  on December 26, 1976. To 

a s i g n i f i c a n t  d e g r e e  t h e s e  f o rm u la s  and c r i t e r i a ,  

which were w i d e l y  c r i t i c i z e d  as  d i r e c t i n g  funds t o  

a r e a s  w i th  v e ry  l i t t l e  unemployment ,  were known 

f r o m  r e g u l a t i o n s  i s s u e d  by EDA w e l l  p r i o r  t o  

December. On the  o t h e r  h a n d ,  b e c a u s e  t h e  f i r s t  

g r a n t s  t o  s t a t e  and l o c a l  governments  were on ly  

announced  i n  l a t e  December, t h e  p r o c e s s  o f  l e t t i n g  

o f  c o n t r a c t s  by t h o s e  g o v e r n m e n t s  c o u l d  o n l y  

commence a f t e r  t h a t  d a t e ,  an d  t h o s e  c o n t r a c t s  

g e n e r a l l y  r e q u i r e d  a t im e-consum ing  c o m p e t i t i v e  

b i d d i n g  p r o c e s s ;  t h u s  t h e  a c t u a l  a w a r d i n g  o f  

c o n t r a c t s  was on ly  j u s t  b e g in n i n g  on F e b r u a r y  4, 

1977,  when th e  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  h e a r i n g s  e nded .  The

56/  P u b l i c  Pape rs  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,  Jimmy C a r t e r ,  
1977, p. 870.

57/  S. Rep. 95 -3 8 ,  p. 2 (1977) .



24

h i r i n g  o f  t h e  w o r k e r s  who u l t i m a t e l y  r e c e i v e d  

employment  u n d e r  t h e  1976 Act was on ly  t o  o c c u r  

l a t e r  y e t .  And a l t h o u g h  EDA k e p t  d e t a i l e d  s t a t i s ­

t i c s  on which c i t i e s  and s t a t e s  won g r a n t s ,  i t  

does  n o t  a p p e a r  t o  have  had  s i m i l a r  d a t a  a v a i l a b l e

r e g a r d i n g  t h e  r a c e  o f  c o n t r a t o r s  o r  t h e i r  em-
. 58 /

p l o y e e s .—

Thus  t h e  d e t a i l e d  h e a r i n g s  and r e p o r t s  

w h i c h  p e t i t i o n e r s  u r g e  s h o u l d  h a v e  p r e c e e d e d  

a d o p t i o n  o f  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  were u t t e r l y  i n c o n ­

s i s t e n t  w i t h  t h e  economic e x i g e n c i e s  w i t h  which 

C o n g r e s s  was c o n c e r n e d .  Such  a c o n g r e s s i o n a l  

i n q u i r y  r e g a r d i n g  m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r s  and employ­

e e s  u n d e r  t h e  1976 Act would have  r e q u i r e d  mon ths ,  

an d  C o n g r e s s  d i d  n o t  h a v e  m o n th s  t o  s p a r e .  

Because  o f  t h e  d i s p a t c h  w i t h  which i t  was e n a c t e d ,  

funds f o r  t h e  1977 P u b l i c  Works Act  became a v a i l ­

a b l e  i n  t h e  l a t e  s p r i n g  and e a r l y  summer of  1977, 

when t h e  unemployment  r a t e  a v e ra g e d  o v e r  7% and 

t h e  i n f l a t i o n  r a t e  was f a l l i n g  t o  u n d e r  5%. But 

had t h e  Act  been  d e l a y e d  s i x  mon th s ,  i t  p r o b a b l y

would have  been  c o u n t e r  p r o d u c t i v e .  By J a n u a r y
59/

1978,  t h e  unemployment  r a t e  had f a l l e n  t o  6.3%,—  

t o t a l  unemployment  had f a l l e n  by 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 , — ^and

58 /  See C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l ,  M i n o r i t y  Firms on 
Loca l  P u b l i c  Works P r o j e c t s  —  Mixed R e s u l t s , p . 8 
(1 9 7 9 ) .  E x p e r i e n c e  Under  t h e  1977 Act i n d i c a t e d  
m i n o r i t y  p a r t i c i p a t i o n  u n d e r  t h e  e a r l i e r  Act was 
low. I d .

59 /  Economic Repor t  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,  1979, p. 
217.

60/  I d .  p .  216.



-  25

i n f l a t i o n  was up t o  9 .6%.—  In 1978 t h e  admin­

i s t r a t i o n  s h i f t e d  i t s  economic p o l i c i e s  away from 

s t i m u l a t i o n  o f  t h e  e c o n o m y ,  r e d u c i n g  f e d e r a l

s p e n d i n g  and  t i g h t e n i n g  f i s c a l  and  m o n e t a r y  
. 6 2 /

p o l i c i e s . —  Thus  t h e  d e l a y  r e q u i r e d  f o r  an 

i n q u i r y  i n t o  t h e  a d m i n i s t r a t i o n  of  t h e  1976 P u b l i c  

Works Act  would have  d e f e a t e d  t h e  e n t i r e  pu rpose  

o f  t h e  1977 A c t .

The l i m i t e d  i n f o r m a t i o n  which was a v a i l a b l e  

a t  t h e  t i m e  o f  t h e  F e b r u a r y ,  1 977 h e a r i n g s ,  

i n d i c a t e d  t h a t  EDA's a l l o c a t i o n  p o l i c i e s  had  had  a 

p ronounced  d i s c r i m i n a t o r y  impact  a g a i n s t  p r e d o m i ­

n a n t l y  b l a c k  co m m u n i t i e s .  A s tu d y  by t h e  M ich igan  

A dv i s o ry  Commit tee  t o  t h e  U n i t e d  S t a t e s  Commission 

on C i v i l  R i g h t s  r e v e a l e d  t h a t  t h e  a v e r a g e  p e r  

c a p i t a  g r a n t  i n  towns o v e r  90% w h i t e  was a lm os t

t h r e e  t im e s  as  h ig h  as t h e  a v e r a g e  g r a n t  i n  towns
6 3 /

u n d e r  90% w h i t e . —  M i n o r i t i e s  made up  22.5%

of  t h e  p o p u l a t i o n  i n  t h e  funded  d i s t r i c t s ,  bu t
64 /

r e c e i v e d  o n l y  12.3% o f  t h e  f u n d i n g . —  T h i s  

o c c u r r e d  d e s p i t e  t h e  f a c t  t h a t  unemployment  was 

f a r  h i g h e r  i n  p r e d o m i n a n t l y  b l a c k  c o m m u n i t i e s

61 /  IdL p. 244.

62 /  I d .  pp. 25,  28.

63 /  The a v e ra g e  p e r  c a p i t a  g r a n t  was $47 .32  i n  
towns ov e r  90% w h i t e  and $16 .4 8  i n  towns unde r  90% 
w h i t e .  H e a r i n g s  b e f o r e  t h e  S u b c o m m i t t e e  on 
Economic Development  o f  t h e  House Commit tee  on 
P u b l i c  Works and T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ,  95 th  C o n g . , 1 s t  
S e s s .  p. 814 (1977 ) .

64 /  I d .  p. 825.



26

t h a n  i n  p r e d o m i n a n t l y  w h i t e  com m un i t i e s .  Con­

g r e s s m a n  C o n y e r s  o f  M i c h i g a n ,  who t e s t i f i e d  

a b o u t  t h i s  a l l o c a t i o n  p r o b l e m ,  a l s o  e x p r e s s e d  

c o n c e r n  a b o u t  m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r s  and em ployees .

I  h a v e  b e e n  c o n t a c t e d  by i n d i v i d u a l s  who 
b e l i e v e  t h a t  m i n o r i t i e s  and women have  been  
d e p r i v e d  o f  e m p l o y m e n t  and  c o n t r a c t i n g  
o p p o r t u n i t i e s  on LPW-funded p r o j e c t s .  I  have 
n o t  h a d  t i m e  t o  i n v e s t i g a t e  t h e i r  a l l e g a ­
t i o n s ,  b u t  t h e  h i s t o r i c a l  p a t t e r n  o f  d i s ­
c r i m i n a t i o n  w i t h i n  t h e  c o n s t r u c t i o n  i n d u s t r y  
l e n d s  c r e d e n c e  t o  t h e i r  c h a r g e s .  F o r  t h e  
n e x t  few d a y s ,  my s t a f f  w i l l  s t u d y  t h i s  
m a t t e r .  I f  i t  a p p e a r s  t h a t  m i n o r i t i e s  and 
women do s u f f e r  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  u n d e r  t h i s  
p r o g r a m ,  I  w i l l  p r o p o s e  an  amendm ent  t o  
s t r e n g t h e n  t h e  n o n d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  p r o v i ­
s i o n  c o n t a i n e d  in  t h e  c u r r e n t  A c t . (Emphasis  
i n  o r i g i n a l ) .  65/

But the  h e a r i n g s  ended on t h e  day R e p r e s e n t a t i v e  

Conyers  t e s t i f i e d ,  and th e  House comm it tee  i s s u e d  

i t s  r e p o r t  s h o r t l y  t h e r e a f t e r .  Thus  t h e  o n l y  

r o u t e  open f o r  p r o t e c t i n g  m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r s  and 

employees was t o  o f f e r  an amendment on t h e  f l o o r  

o f  t h e  House.

Conyers  r e p o r t e d  t o  t h e  House t h a t :

EDA's O f f i c e  o f  C i v i l  R i g h t s  a p p a r e n t l y  made 
l i t t l e  e f f o r t  to  c l o s e l y  r e v i e w  a f f i r m a t i v e  
a c t i o n  and  c i v i l  r i g h t s  c o m p l i a n c e  d a t a  
w i t h i n  i n d i v i d u a l  a p p l i c a t i o n s .  66 /

He a l s o  n o t e d  h i s  o f f i c e  was " r e p l e t e  w i t h  

e x a m p l e s "  o f  m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r s  u n a b l e  t o

65 /  I d . p. 939. The 1976 Act c o n t a i n e d  a g e n e r a l  
p r o h i b i t i o n  a g a i n s t  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n .  42 U.S .C.  § 
6709.

6 6 /  123 Cong .  Rec .  E 973 ( d a i l y  e d .  F e b .  24 ,
1977) .  _____________ ___________



27

w i n  c o n t r a c t s  b e c a u s e  o f  t h e  " i n t r i c a c i e s "  o f
67/

t h e  b i d d i n g  p r o c e s s . —

The s o l u t i o n  s u p p o r t e d  by Conyers  was t h e  MBE

p r o v i s i o n  w h i c h  i s  t h e  s u b j e c t  o f  t h e  i n s t a n t

a c t i o n .  The amendment was o f f e r e d  by Congressman

M i t c h e l l ,  r a t h e r  t h a n  by C o n g r e s s m a n  C o n y e r s ,

a p p a r e n t l y  b e c a u s e  M i t c h e l l  was t h e  l e a d i n g  House

p r o p o n e n t  o f  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  e n t e r p r i s e s ,

and had l e s s  t h a n  a month b e f o r e  he o f f e r e d  a b i l l

t o  r e q u i r e  t h a t  v i r t u a l l y  a l l  f e d e r a l  p rocu re m e n t

and c o n s t r u c t i o n  c o n t r a c t s  be s u b j e c t  t o  a m i n o r -
68/l t y  s e t - a s i d e  r e q u i r e m e n t . —  G i v i n g  m i n o r i t y

b u s i n e s s  e n t e r p r i s e s  p r e f e r e n t i a l  t r e a t m e n t  in

b i d d i n g  f o r  f e d e r a l l y - f u n d e d  c o n t r a c t s  was n o t

a n o v e l  p r o p o s a l .  S ince  1968 th e  Small  B u s i n e s s

A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ,  a c t i n g  u n d e r  s e c t i o n  8 ( a )  o f  t h e

Small  B u s i n e s s  Act  of  1953, 15 U .S .C .  § 6 3 7 ( a ) ,

had a r r a n g e d  f o r  p rocurem en t  c o n t r a c t s  t o  be l e t

t o  m i n o r i t y  f i r m s  w i t h o u t  any r e q u i r e m e n t  o f

c o m p e t i t i v e  b i d d i n g .  The c o n t r a c t s  l e t  i n  t h i s

manner  i n v o l v e d  th o u s a n d s  of  m i n o r i t y  f i r m s  and 
. . 69/hu n d red s  o f  m i l l i o n s  of  d o l l a r s . —  O th e r  f e d ­

e r a l  a g e n c i e s  m a i n t a i n e d  v a r i o u s  programs s e t t i n g

67/  I d .  H 1440.

68 /  123 Cong. Rec. H 611-H 613 ( d a i l y  ed .  J a n .
31, 1977) .

69 /  See J o i n t  H e a r in g  on M i n o r i t y  C o n t r a c t i n g  
B e f o r e  t h e  S e n a t e  S e l e c t  C o m m i t t e e  on S m a l l  
B u s i n e s s  and t h e  S u b c o m i t t e e  on M i n o r i t y  E n t e r ­
p r i s e  and G e n e r a l  O v e r s i g h t  o f  t h e  House Small  
B u s i n e s s  Commit tee ,  95 th  C ong . ,  2d S e s s .  5 (1 9 7 8 ) .



28

minimum l e v e l s  o f  m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r  p a r t i c i p a -  
70/

t i o n . —  The c o m m it t ee  d r a f t  o f  t h e  1977 P u b l i c

Works Act a l r e a d y  c o n t a i n e d  a s e t - a s i d e  p r o v i s i o n ,

r e s e r v i n g  2 1/2% o f  the  funds  f o r  p u b l i c  works

p r o j e c t s  f o r  " I n d i a n  t r i b e s  an d  A l a s k a  N a t i v e  
, ,71/V i l l a g e s . " —  In p r o p o s i n g  u t i l i z a t i o n  o f  t h i s

a p p r o a c h ,  Congressman M i t c h e l l  and S e n a t o r  Brooke

e m p h a s i z e d  t h a t  i t  h a d  l o n g  b e e n  u s e d  by t h e
7 2 /

f e d e r a l  g o v e r n m e n t , —  and  t h a t  s p e c i f y i n g  t h e

p o r t i o n  o f  government  c o n t r a c t s  t o  be so s e t  a s i d e

was a l r e a d y  a common p r a c t i c e  among s t a t e  g o v e r n -  
7 3 /

m e n t s . —  T h u s ,  when C o n g r e s s  a d o p t e d  t h e  MBE 

p r o v i s i o n  t o  a c h i e v e  i t s  p u r p o s e s ,  i t  invoked  not  

a r a d i c a l  and  u n p r e c e d e n t e d  s o l u t i o n ,  b u t  a 

w e l l - e s t a b l i s h e d  d e v i c e  w i t h  w h ic h  b o t h  t h e  

f e d e r a l  and  s t a t e  g o v e r n m e n t s  h a d  s u b s t a n t i a l  

e x p e r i e n c e .

U n d e r  t h e  t h e n - e x i s t i n g  e c o n o m i c  c i r c u m ­

s t a n c e s ,  t h e  p r o c e d u r e s  l e a d i n g  t o  t h e  a d o p t i o n  of

70 /  C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l ,  M i n o r i t y  Firms on Loca l  
P u b l i c  Works P r o j e c t s  - -  M ixed  R e s u l t s ,  p .  5 
(1979 ) .

71/  See 42 U.S .C .  § 6 7 0 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) .

72/  123 Cong. Rec. H 1437 ( d a i l y  e d .  Feb.  24, 
1 9 7 7 ) ;  123 Cong .  Rec .  S 3910  ( d a i l y  e d .  March 
10, 1977) .

73/  I d . H 1437-38 ,  H 1440.  S e t - a s i d e  programs i n  
I l l i n o i s  and C o lo rado  were d e s c r i b e d  in  U n i t ed  
S t a t e s  Commission on C i v i l  R i g h t s ,  M i n o r i t i e s  and 
Women as  G o v e r n m e n t  C o n t r a c t o r s ,  pp .  1 0 2 - 1 0 4  
(1975 ) .



29

t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  were no t  m e r e ly  u n d e r s t a n d a b l e ,  

b u t  t h e  on ly  manner  i n  which C ongress  c o u ld  have 

a d d r e s s e d  t h e  u n d e r l y i n g  p r o b le m s .  I f ,  as  p e t i ­

t i o n e r s  s u g g e s t ,  C ongress  can on ly  adop t  r a c e ­

c o n s c i o u s  r e m e d i e s  a f t e r  e x h a u s t i v e  c o m m i t t e e  

h e a r i n g s  an d  d e t a i l e d  c o m m i t t e e  r e p o r t s ,  t h e n  

C o n g r e s s  w o u ld  b e  p o w e r l e s s  t o  a d d r e s s  s u c h  

r a c i a l  i s s u e s  d u r i n g  an economic o r  o t h e r  c r i s i s .  

I t  i s  i n c o n c e i v a b l e  t h a t  t h e  F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment 

compels  such a c o n c l u s i o n .  When t h a t  Amendment 

was a d o p te d ,  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  h e a r i n g s  were i n f r e ­

q u e n t  and comm it tee  r e p o r t s  were o f t e n  p e r f u n c ­

t o r y .  C o n s t i t u t i o n a l  c o n s t r a i n t s  on c o n g r e s s i o n a l  

p r o c e d u r e s  a r e  s p e l l e d  ou t  e x p r e s s l y  i n  A r t i c l e  I ,  

w h i c h  r e q u i r e s  n e i t h e r  h e a r i n g s  n o r  r e p o r t s ,

b u t  o n ly  a m a j o r i t y  v o t e  of  b o t h  h o u s e s  t o  adop t
7 4 /  . . .l e g i s l a t i o n . —  I t  w o u l d  be i n c o n s i s t e n t  w i t h

t h e  s e p a r a t i o n  o f  powers  f o r  t h i s  C ou r t  t o  impose

on C o n g r e s s  o t h e r  m ore  d e t a i l e d  r u l e s  f o r  t h e

f a s h i o n i n g  o f  l e g i s l a t i o n .  Congress  r e g u l a r l y

a d d s  and  d e l e t e s  b i l l i o n s  o f  d o l l a r s  f r o m  t h e

f e d e r a l  b u d g e t  on t h e  f l o o r  o f  t h e  House  o r

S e n a t e  b a s e d  on d e b a t e s  c o m p a r e d  t o  w h i c h  t h e

i n s t a n t  l e g i s l a t i v e  h i s t o r y  i s  fu l som e.  Momentous

l e g i s l a t i o n  o f t e n  comes i n t o  b e i n g  a s  a f l o o r

74/  J e f f e r s o n ' s  Manual of  P a r l i a m e n t a r y  P r a c t i c e ,  
u s e d  by b o t h  h o u s e s  i n  t h e  e a r l y  y e a r s  o f  t h e  
R e p u b l i c ,  r e g a r d e d  r e s o r t  t o  com m it tees  as  op­
t i o n a l .  S e c t i o n  XXVI ( 1 9 7 7 ) .



30

a m e n d m e n t ;  t h e  1968  f a i r  h o u s i n g  l e g i s l a t i o n ,  

f o r  e x a m p l e ,  was a d o p t e d  by t h e  S e n a t e  as  an  

amendment t o  a b i l l  d e a l i n g  p r i m a r i l y  w i t h  r i o t s ,  

I n d i a n  r i g h t s ,  and  v i o l e n t  i n t e r f e r e n c e  w i t h  

f e d e r a l l y  p r o t e c t e d  a c t i v i t i e s .  C o n g r e s s i o n a l  

c om m it t ee s  have been  b o th  r o u n d ly  condemned as  

i n e f f i c i e n t  and  p r a i s e d  a s  e s s e n t i a l ~ — ̂ and  

c o g e n t  a r g u m e n t s  c o u l d  d o u b t l e s s  be made f o r  

i n c r e a s i n g  o r  d e c r e a s i n g  t h e i r  r o l e ,  b u t  t h a t  i s  a 

m a t t e r  c o n f i d e d  t o  t h e  d i s c r e t i o n  of  t h e  C o n g re s s .  

The F o u r t e e n t h  Amendment no more e n a c t e d  G e n e r a l  

Henry R o b e r t ' s  Rules  o f  Order  t h a t  i t  e n a c t e d  Mr.
j

H e r b e r t  S p e n c e r ' s  S o c i a l  S t a t i c s . —

I I I .

H I .  THE PURPOSES OF THE MBE PROVISION

The p u r p o s e s  w h i c h  p r o m p t e d  C o n g r e s s  t o  
a d o p t  t h e  MBE p r o v i s o n  were  c l e a r l y  a r t i c u l a t e d  on 

t h e  f l o o r s  o f  bo th  t h e  House and t h e  S e n a t e .  Be­

c a u se  of t h e  t im e  c o n s t r a i n t s  n o t e d  above ,  l i t t l e  

i n f o r m a t i o n  was a v a i l a b l e  ab o u t  t h e  a d m i n i s t r a t i o n

75/  See ,  e ■g ■, R. Nader ,  R u l i n g  Congress  ( 1 9 7 5 ) ;
T. Murphy, P o l i t i c s  o f  C o n g r e s s i o n a l  Commit tees
( 1 9 7 8 ) ;  N. O r n s t e i n ,  Changing C o n g r e s s : The Com­
m i t t e e  Sys tem (1 9 7 4 ) .

76 /  Lochner  v .  New Y o r k , 198 U.S.  45 ,  75 (1905)  
(Holmes,  J .  , d i s s e n t i n g ) ;  F e rg u so n  v .  Sk rupa ,  372
U .  S. 726,  728-733 ( 1 9 6 3 ) .



31

o f  t h e  1976 P u b l i c  Works Act  i n  p a r t i c u l a r ,  and 

C ongress  r e l i e d  p r i m a r i l y  on i t s  knowledge of  t h e  

g e n e r a l  p r a c t i c e s  of  c o n t r a c t i n g  o f f i c i a l s  and 

f e d e r a l  c o n t r a c t o r s .  The d i s m a l  r e c o r d  t h a t  had  

been  com pi led  by t h o s e  p a s t  p r a c t i c e s  had been  t h e  

s u b j e c t  o f  r e p e a t e d  r e p o r t s  by o r  t o  t h e  C o n g r e s s ,  

and was a r e c o r d  w i t h  which t h e  C ongress  was q u i t e  

f a m i l i a r .  No r e a s o n  a p p e a r e d  th e n  o r  s i n c e  to  

b e l i e v e  t h a t  t h e  a d m i n i s t r a t i o n  of  t h e  1976 P u b l i c  

Works A c t  h a d  b e e n  s i g n i f i c a n t l y  b e t t e r  t h a n  

t h a t  g e n e r a l  r e c o r d ,  and t h e  p e t i t i o n e r s  do not  

a s s e r t  t h a t  Cong res s  was no t  j u s t i f i e d  i n  r e l y i n g  

on t h e  b r o a d e r  r e c o r d .

(1 )  Overcoming D i s c r i m i n a t i o n - B a s e d  Problems 
o f  M i n o r i t y  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e s

Both th e  House and S e n a te  p r o p o n e n t s  o f  t h e  

MBE p r o v i s i o n  b a s e d  i t  i n  p a r t  on t h e  n e e d  t o  

a s s u r e  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s m e n  a " f a i r  s h a r e "  o f  

f e d e r a l  p u b l i c  works  f u n d s . —  Congressman B ia g g i  

u r g e d ,

F i s c a l  y e a r  1976 f i g u r e s  i n d i c a t e  t h a t  l e s s  
t h a n  1 p e r c e n t  of  a l l  F e d e r a l  p rocurem en t  
c o n t r a c t s  went t o  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  e n t e r ­
p r i s e s .  Th is  i s  a s i t u a t i o n  which must  be 
r e m e d i e d .  . . . [ W j i t h o u t  a d o p t i o n  o f  t h i s  
amendment,  t h i s  l e g i s l a t i o n  may be p o t e n ­
t i a l l y  i n e q u i t a b l e  t o  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  and 
w o r k e r s .  78/

7 7 /  123 Cong .  R e c . H 1436 ( r e m a r k s  o f  Rep .
M i t c h e l l )  ( d a i l y  ed.  Feb.  24, 1977) .

78/  I d .  H 1440.



32

S e n a t o r  Brooke  a l s o  n o t e d  w i t h  a l a r m  t h e  sm a l l

number of  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  among f e d e r a l  c on-  
79/

t r a c t o r s . —

These  s t a t e m e n t s  r e f l e c t  no t  t h e  un in fo rm ed  

whim o f  l e g i s l a t o r s  s e e k i n g  f a v o r s  f o r  t h e i r  

c o n s t i t u e n t s ,  b u t  t h e  c u l m i n a t i o n  o f  a l m o s t  a 

decade  o f  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  i n q u i r y  and a c t i o n  con­

c e r n i n g  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s .  The p r o b l e m s  o f  

m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  f i r s t  became a m a jo r  f e d e r a l  

p r i o r i t y  i n  1969 when P r e s i d e n t  N i x o n  s i g n e d  

E x e c u t i v e  Orde r  11458, p r o v i d i n g  f o r  t h e  d e v e l o p ­

ment of  a n a t i o n a l  p rogram t o  a s s i s t  " t h e  e s t a b ­

l i s h m e n t ,  p r e s e r v a t i o n  and  s t r e n g t h e n i n g  o f  

m i n i o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  e n t e r p r i s e . "  S e c t i o n  1 ( a ) ( i ) .  

I n  1971 and  1972  t h e  s u b c o m m i t t e e  on M i n o r i t y  

S m a l l  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e  o f  t h e  House  S m a l l  

B u s i n e s s  Commit tee  c o n d u c te d  e x t e n s i v e  h e a r i n g s  on 

t h e  o b s t a c l e s  f a c i n g  m i n o r i t y  b u s in e s s m e n .  I t  

c o n c lu d e d  t h a t  t h e  o b s t a c l e s  had t h e i r  r o o t s  i n  

p a s t  r a c i a l  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n .  " T h e s e  p r o b l e m s ,  

which a r e  economic  i n  n a t u r e ,  a r e  t h e  r e s u l t  of  

p a s t  s o c i a l  s t a n d a r d s  which l i n g e r  a s  c h a r a c t e r i s ­

t i c s  o f  m i n o r i t i e s  as a g r o u p . "  H. Rep. 92-1615 ,  

p. 3. The " lo n g  h i s t o r y  o f  r a c i a l  b i a s "  t o  which 

m i n o r i t i e s  had  b e e n  s u b j e c t e d  i n v a r i a b l y  l e d ,  i t  

found ,  t o  t h e  l a c k  o f  c a p i t a l  and e x p e r i e n c e  which 

s e r i o u s l y  h a n d i c a p p e d  t h e  e f f o r t s  o f  m i n o r i t y  

e n t r e p r e n e u r s .  I d .  a t  3 -4 .

79/  123 Cong. Rec. S 3910 ( d a i l y  e d .  March 19
19 7 7 ) .



33

I n  1 975 t h a t  H ouse  s u b c o m m i t t e e  a g a i n  

c o n d u c te d  s e v e r a l  days of  h e a r i n g s  on t h i s  s u b ­

j e c t ,  and found th e  c o n t i n u i n g  problems o f  m i n o r ­

i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  t o  have  t h e  same o r i g i n .

The e f f e c t  o f  p a s t  i n e q u i t i e s  stemming from 
r a c i a l  p r e j u d i c e  h a v e  n o t  r e m a i n e d  i n  
t h e  p a s t .  The C ongress  has  r e c o g n i z e d  th e  
r e a l i t y  t h a t  p a s t  d i s c r i m i n a t o r y  p r a c t i c e s  
h a v e ,  t o  some d e g r e e ,  a d v e r s e l y  a f f e c t e d  
our  p r e s e n t  economic sys tem .

While  m i n o r i t y  p e r s o n s  c om pr i se  abou t  
16 p e r c e n t  of  t h e  N a t i o n ' s  p o p u l a t i o n ,  o f  
t h e  13 m i l l i o n  b u s i n e s s e s  i n  t h e  U n i t e d  
S t a t e s ,  o n l y  382 ,000 ,  o r  a p p r o x i m a t e l y  3 .0  
p e r c e n t ,  a r e  owned by m i n o r i t y  i n d i v i d u a l s .  
The most  r e c e n t  d a t a  f rom t h e  Depar tm ent  o f  
Commerce a l s o  i n d i c a t e s  t h a t  t h e  g r o s s  
r e c e i p t s  o f  a l l  b u s i n e s s e s  i n  t h i s  c o u n t r y  
t o t a l s  abou t  $ 2 , 5 4 0 . 8  b i l l i o n ,  and of  t h i s  
am o u n t  o n l y  $ 1 6 . 6  b i l l i o n ,  o r  a b o u t  0 . 6 5  
p e r c e n t  was r e a l i z e d  by m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  
c o n c e r n s .

These  s t a t i s t i c s  a r e  n o t  t h e  r e s u l t  o f  
random c h a n c e .  The p r e s u m p t i o n  must  be made 
t h a t  p a s t  d i s c r i m i n a t o r y  s y s t e m s  h a v e  
r e s u l t e d  i n  t h e  p r e s e n t  e c o n o m i c  i n e q u i ­
t i e s .  80/

The s u b c o m m i t t e e  r e i t e r a t e d  t h a t  c o n c l u s i o n  

on J a n u a r y  3, 1977, two y e a r s  l a t e r :

The v e r y  b a s i c  p r o b l e m  d i s c l o s e d  by t h e  
t e s t i m o n y  i s  t h a t ,  ov e r  t h e  y e a r s ,  t h e r e  h a s  
d e v e lo p e d  a b u s i n e s s  sys tem  which h a s  t r a d i ­
t i o n a l l y  e x c l u d e d  m e a s u r a b l e  m i n o r i t y  p a r ­
t i c i p a t i o n .  I n  t h e  p a s t  more  t h a n  t h e  
p r e s e n t ,  t h i s  s y s te m  o f  c o n d u c t i n g  b u s i n e s s  
t r a n s a c t i o n s  o v e r t l y  p r e c l u d e d  m i n o r i t y  
i n p u t .  C u r r e n t l y ,  we more o f t e n  e n c o u n t e r

80 /  H. Rep. 94 -468 ,  pp .  1 -2.



34

a b u s i n e s s  s y s te m  which i s  r a c i a l l y  n e u t r a l  
on i t s  f a c e ,  b u t  b e c a u s e  o f  p a s t  o v e r t  s o c i a l  
and e c o n o m i c  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  i s  p r e s e n t l y  
o p e r a t i n g ,  i n  e f f e c t ,  t o  p e r p e t u a t e  t h e s e  
p a s t  i n e q u i t i e s .  81 /

T h i s  l a t t e r  r e p o r t  was i s s u e d  l e s s  t h a n  two 

months b e f o r e  t h e  a d o p t i o n  o f  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  by 

t h e  House.

To e l i m i n a t e  t h e  c o n t i n u i n g  e f f e c t s  on

m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  o f  p a s t  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n ,

t h e  f e d e r a l  g o v e r n m e n t  h a d  a d o p t e d  o v e r  100

p r o g r a m s  t o  a i d  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s .  T h e s e

programs  i n c l u d e d  f i n a n c i a l ,  m a r k e t i n g  and b u s i -
8 2 /n e s s  m a n a g e m e n t  a s s i s t a n c e . —  But  d e s p i t e  t h e  

s u b s t a n t i a l  f e d e r a l  e f f o r t s  to  c r e a t e  and s u s t a i n  

m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s ,  t h o s e  f i rm s  r e c e i v e d  l e s s  

t h a n  on e  p e r c e n t  o f  a l l  f e d e r a l  c o n t r a c t s .  

Congressman M i t c h e l l  a rg u e d  t h a t  such  c o n t r a c t i n g  

p r a c t i c e s  were f r u s t r a t i n g  f e d e r a l  p o l i c y :

81 /  H. Rep. 94 -1791 ,  p.  182;  s e e  a l s o  S. Rep. 
9 1 - 1 3 4 3 ,  p .  45 ( 1 9 7 0 ) .  A f e d e r a l  t a s k  f o r c e  
r e a c h e d  th e  same c o n c l u s i o n .  R epo r t  o f  t h e  Task 
F o r c e  on  E d u c a t i o n  and  T r a i n i n g  f o r  M i n o r i t y  
B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e ^  pu T7 (1974)  ( "Decades oT
p r e j u d i c e ,  poor  e d u c a t i o n a l  o p p o r t u n i t y ,  l i m i t e d  
a c c e s s  to  r e a l  management p o s i t i o n s  w i t h i n  Ameri­
c a n  b u s i n e s s  and  i n d u s t r y  h a v e  c o n s p i r e d  t o  
r e s t r i c t  t h e  e n t r y  o f  m i n o r i t i e s  i n t o  t h e  main­
s t r e a m  o f  t h e  n a t i o n ' s  f r e e  e n t e r p r i s e  s y s t e m . " )

82 /  U.S.  Depar tm ent  of  Com m erce ,O ff ice  o f  M in o r ­
i t y  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e .  F e d e r a l  A s s i s t a n c e  
Programs f o r  M i n o r i t y  B u s i n e s s " E n t e r p r i s e s  (1977) .



35

We spend  a g r e a t  d e a l  of  F e d e r a l  money u n d e r  
t h e  SBA program c r e a t i n g ,  s t r e n g t h e n i n g  and 
s u p p o r t i n g  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  and y e t  when 
i t  comes down t o  g i v i n g  t h o s e  m i n o r i t y  
b u s i n e s s e s  a p i e c e  o f  t h e  a c t i o n ,  t h e  
F e d e r a l  G o v e r n m e n t  i s  a b s o l u t e l y  r e m i s s .  
A l l  i t  does  i s  say  t h a t ,  "We w i l l  c r e a t e  you 
on th e  one hand and ,  on th e .  o t h e r  hand ,  we 
w i l l  d e n y  y o u . "  T h a t  d e n i a l  i s  m ad e  
a b s o l u t e l y  c l e a r  when one  l o o k s  a t  t h e  
amount o f  c o n t r a c t s  l e t  in  any g iv e n  f i s c a l  
y e a r  and t h e n  one looks  a t  t h e  p e r c e n t a g e  of  
m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t s .  83 /  . . . .  [W]e approve  
a b u d g e t  f o r  OMBE [ O f f i c e  o f  M i n o r i t y  
B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e ] ,  we approve  a budge t  
f o r  t h e  SBA, and we a p p ro v e  o t h e r  b u d g e t s  t o  
run  t h o s e  m i n o r i t y  e n t e r p r i s e s ,  t o  make them 
become v i a b l e  e n t i t i e s  i n  o u r  sys tem ,  bu t  
t h e n  on th e  o t h e r  hand  we say  no ,  t h e y  a re  
c u t  o f f  from c o n t r a c t s .

M i t c h e l l  u r g e d  t h a t  l e g i s l a t i o n  m an d a t in g  t h a t

c o n t r a c t s  be awarded t o  m i n o r i t i e s  were needed

b e c a u s e  " e v e r y  agency o f  t h e  Government  h a s  t r i e d

t o  f i g u r e  o u t  a way t o  a v o i d  d o i n g  t h i s  v e r y  
84 /t h i n g . " — The U n i t e d  S t a t e s  Commission on C i v i l

R i g h t s  h a d  r e p o r t e d  t o  C o n g r e s s  l e s s  t h a n  two

y e a r s  b e f o r e  t h a t  m i n o r i t y - o w n e d  f i rm s  fac e d  a

s e r i o u s  p r o b l e m  o f  i n t e n t i o n a l  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n

b e c a u s e  " [ g ] overnment  c o n t r a c t i n g  o f f i c e r s  e x -
, ,85 /

p r e s s e d  b i a s e s  a g a i n s t  m i n o r i t y  f i r m s . . . .  —

83/  123 Cong. Rec. H 1436-7 ( d a i l y  ed .  Feb.  24,
1977) .

84 /  123 Cong. Rec. H 1438 ( d a i l y  ed .  Feb.  24,
1977) .

85 /  M i n o r i t i e s  and Women as Government  C o n t r a c -  
t o r s ,  p .  1 12 ( 1 9 7 5 ) ;  s e e  a l s o  pp .  i ,  2 0 - 2 2 .



-  36

Thus  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  was a d o p t e d  and  

ne e ded  t o  overcome bo th  on g o in g  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  and 

t h e  c o n t i n u i n g  e f f e c t s  o f  p a s t  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n .

(2 )  Reduc ing  B lack  Unemployment

The c e n t r a l  fo c u s  of  t h e  h e a r i n g s  and d e b a t e  

r e g a r d i n g  t h e  1977 P u b l i c  Works Act  was t h e  need 

to  a s s u r e  b e t t e r  t a r g e t i n g  of  t h e  c o n s t r u c t i o n  

funds t o  a r e a s  o f  h i g h  unemployment .  The h e a r i n g s  

i n d i c a t e d  t h a t  funds  had  to o  o f t e n  gone t o  a f ­

f l u e n t  w h i t e  a r e a s  w i th  l i t t l e ,  i f  any ,  unemploy­

m ent .  Th i s  was n o t  on ly  u n f a i r ,  b u t  e c o n o m i c a l ly  

unsound ,  s i n c e  i n c r e a s e d  demand f o r  l a b o r  i n  a r e a s  

o f  low unemployment was l i k e l y  t o  be i n f l a t i o n a r y .  

S e n a t o r  Brooke u r g e d  t h a t  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n

was an i m p o r t a n t  way t o  i n s u r e  "moneys a r e  p r o p e r -
,  ,  . .86 /l y  t a r g e t e d . —

I t  i s  an a p p r o p r i a t e  c o n c e p t  b e c au s e  
m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s '  w ork  f o r c e s  a r e  p r i n ­
c i p a l l y  drawn from r e s i d e n t s  of  comm unit ies  
w i t h  s e v e r e  and c h r o n i c  unemployment .  With 
m ore  b u s i n e s s ,  t h e s e  f i r m s  c a n  h i r e  e v e n  
more m i n o r i t y  c i t i z e n s .  Only w i th  a h e a l t h y ,  
v i t a l  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s  s e c t o r  can we hope 
t o  make d r a m a t i c  s t r i d e s  i n  o u r  f i g h t  
a g a i n s t  t h e  m a s s i v e  and c h r o n i c  unemployment  
which p l a g u e s  t h r o u g h o u t  t h i s  c o u n t r y .  87 /

86/  123 Cong. Rec. 3910 ( d a i l y  ed .  March 10,
1 9 7 7 ) .

87/  I d .



37

Congressman B i a g g i ,  a r g u i n g  i n  a s i m i l a r  v e i n ,  

n o t e d  t h a t  unemployment  among m i n o r i t y  g roups  was 

r u n n i n g  " a s  h i g h  as  35 p e r c e n t " ,  and  t h a t  t h e  

amendm en t  was  n e e d e d  t o  a v o i d  " p o t e n t i a l  i n ­

e q u i t i e s  t o  . . .  w o r k e r s "  and would p r o v i d e  " g r e a t
8 8 /

b e n e f i t  t o  t h e  e n t i r e  m i n o r i t y  c o m m u n i t y . " —  

C o n g r e s s '  c o n c e r n  abou t  m i n o r i t y  unemploy­

ment was w e l l  founded .  In  J a n u a r y ,  1977,  unem­

p loyment  was 12.7% among n o n - w h i t e s ,  compared to
89 /

6.8% among w h i t e s . —  By March of  t h a t  y e a r  w h i t e

unemployment  was f a l l i n g  w h i l e  n o n - w h i t e  unemploy-
. . 90 /ment was a c t u a l l y  r i s i n g . —  Teenage unemployment

e xc ee de d  36% among n o n - w h i t e s ,  o v e r  t w i c e  t h e  r a t e
91/among w h i t e  t e e n a g e r s . —  The h i s t o r y  and m ag n i ­

t u d e  o f  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  a g a i n s t  m i n o r i t i e s  i n  t h e

c o n s t r u c t i o n  i n d u s t r i e s  was w e l l - d o c u m e n t e d  and 
92 /

w e l l - k n o w n . —  C o n g r e s s  was j u s t i f i a b l y  c o n ­

c e r n e d  t h a t  a f e d e r a l  s p e n d in g  p rogram i n v o l v i n g  

c o n s t r u c t i o n  was e s p e c i a l l y  l i k e l y  t o  a f f o r d  a 

d i s p r o p o r t i o n a t e l y  s m a l l  number  o f  j o b s  t o  m i n o r -

88 /  123 Cong. Rec.  H 1440 ( d a i l y  ed .  Feb.  24,
1 9 7 7 ) .

89 /  Economic Repor t  o f  t h e  P r e s i d e n t ,  1979, p. 
218.

9 0 /  I d .  By Novem ber  w h i t e  u n e m p l o y m e n t  h a d  
f a l l e n  t o  5.9%, w h i l e  t h e  n o n - w h i t e  r a t e  had  r i s e n  
t o  13.5%.

91 /  I d .

92 /  See ,  e . g . ,  U n i t e d  S t a t e s  Commission on C i v i l  
R i g h t s ,  The C h a l l e n g e  Ahead:  Equa l  O p p o r t u n i t y  i n  
R e f e r r a l  Unions (1976 ) .



38

i t i e s  among whom unemployment  was t h e  h i g h e s t .

The p r o p o r t i o n  o f  m i n o r i t y  employees  i n  m i n o r i t y -

owned f i r m s  i s  s u b s t a n t i a l l y  h i g h e r  t h a n  i n
93/

w h i t e -o w n e d  f i r m s . —  Under t h e s e  c i r c u m s t a n c e s  

C ong res s  p r o p e r l y  r e s o r t e d  t o  " t a r g e t i n g "  m i n o r i t y  

b u s i n e s s e s  as a method o f  t a r g e t i n g  unemployed 
m i n o r i t i e s .

( 3 ) The L a c k  o f  A v a i l a b l e A 1 t e r n a t  i v e s

The p e t i t i o n e r s  u r g e  t h a t  the MBE p r o v i s i o n

m u s t  b e s t r u c k down b e c a u s e  i t was n o t  t h e
" l e a s t  o n e r o u s " m e t h o d  o f  a c h i e v i ng C o n g r  es s '

94 /
such  r e q u i r e m e n t ,p u r p o s e s . ■—  No i n  ou r  v iew,

i s  imposed by th e  C o n s t i t u t i o n  on b e n ig n  r a c i a l  

c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s .  M oreover ,  no r e a s o n  a p p e a r s  t o  

c h a r a c t e r i z e  t h e  MBE p r o v i s i o n  as l e s s  " o n e r o u s "

t h a n  t h e  a l t e r n a t i v e s  p r e s s e d  by p e t i t i o n e r s ,  such
, , . . 9 5 /a s  c a s h  a d v a n c e s  t o  m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r s . —

I f  such a l t e r n a t i v e s  were s u c c e s s f u l ,  t h e y  would

s t i l l  r e s u l t  i n  r e c i p i e n t  m i n o r i t y  b u s in e s s m e n

w in n in g  c o n t r a c t s ,  and w h i t e  b u s in e s s m e n  l o s i n g

them, b e c a u s e  o f  t h e  r a c e  o f  ea ch .  The e f f e c t

93 /  See ,  e . g . ,  H e a r ings  on SBA's 8 ( a )  Subcon­
t r a c t i n g  P r o g r a m  B e f o r e  t h e  S u b c o m m i t t e e  on 
G o v e r n m e n t  P r o c u r e m e n t  o f  t h e  S e n a t e  S m a l l  
B u s i n e s s  C o m m i t t e e ,  92nd  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  83 
( 1 9 7 1 ) .  The MBE p r o v i s i o n  i n  f a c t  " p r o v i d e d  
employment  f o r  m i n o r i t i e s  t h a t  o t h e r w i s e  would n o t  
h a v e  b e e n  a v a i l a b l e . "  C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l ,  
M i n o r i t y  F i r m s  on Loca l  P u b l i c  Works P r o j e c t  — 
Mixed R e s u l t s ,  p. 14 (1 9 7 9 ) .

94/  B r i e f  f o r  P e t i t i o n e r s ,  pp.  21-28 .  

95/  I d .  p. 22.



39

on t h e  l o s i n g  b i d d e r  would be no l e s s  s u b s t a n t i a l ,  
b u t  on ly  l e s s  o v e r t .

I n  any  e v e n t ,  C o n g r e s s  c l e a r l y  b e l i e v e d

t h a t  o n l y  t h e  MBE c l a u s e  would s u f f i c e  t o  a c h i e v e

i t s  p u r p o s e s .  R e p r e s e n t a t i v e  M i t c h e l l  a r g u e d

t h a t  s e t - a s i d e s  were " t h e  on ly  way we a r e  going  to
9 6 /g e t  m i n o r i t y  e n t e r p r i s e s  i n t o  o u r  s y s t e m " . —

S e n a t o r  Brooke u r g e d  t h e  p r o v i s i o n  was

n e c e s s a r y  b e c a u s e  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  have  
r e c e i v e d  o n l y  1 p e r c e n t  o f  t h e  F e d e r a l  
c o n t r a c t  d o l l a r ,  d e s p i t e  r e p e a t e d  l e g i s l a ­
t i o n ,  E x e c u t i v e  O r d e r s ,  and  r e g u l a t i o n s  
m a n d a t i n g  a f f i r m a t i v e  e f f o r t s  t o  i n c l u d e  
m i n o r i t y  c o n t r a c t o r s  i n  t h e  F e d e r a l  c o n ­
t r a c t s  p o o l .  97 /

The f a i l u r e  o f  t h e  a l t e r n a t i v e  a p p ro a c h e s  u r g e d

by p e t i t i o n e r s ,  and a t t e m p t e d  i n  t h e  p a s t ,  was

documented i n  d e t a i l  by a s e r i e s  of  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  
9 8 /  9 9 /

r e p o r t s ---- and  h e a r i n g s —  an d  a r e p o r t  o f  t h e

96 /  123 Cong. Rec. H 1437 ( d a i l y  ed .  Feb.  24,
1977) .

97/  123 Cong. Rec. S 3910 ( d a i l y  ed .  March 10,
1977) .

98/  S. Rep. 94 -636 ,  pp .  221-227 ( 1 9 7 6 ) ;  S. Rep.
9 1 -  1343, pp.  45 -50  ( 1 9 7 0 ) ;  H. Rep. 94-1791 ,  pp.
124-149 ( 1 9 7 7 ) ;  H. Rep. 94 -468  ( 1 9 7 5 ) ;  H. Rep.
9 2 -  1615 (1 9 7 2 ) .

99 /  H e a r in g  on the  Small  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n  
§ 8 ( a )  C o n t r a c t  P rocurem en t  Program b e f o r e  t h e
S e n a te  Committee  on Small  B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  Cong . ,  2d 
S e s s .  ( 1976) ;  H e a r in g s  on SBIC and SBLC Programs



-  40 -

U n i t e d  S t a t e s  Commission on C i v i l  

need f o r  im m edia te  e x p e n d i t u r e  of  

i n  g r a n t s  d u r i n g  t h e  s p r i n g  and

Ri gh t  s . - 

t h e  $4 

s umme r

100/ The

b i l l i o n  

of  1977

99 /  c o n t ' d .

and S e l e c t e d  SBA A c t i t i t i e s  B e fo re  t h e  Subcom­
m i t t e e  on SBA O v e r s i g h t  and M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e s  
of  t h e  House Commit tee  on Small  B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  
C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  ( 1 9 7 6 ) ;  O v e r s i g h t  H e a r in g s  on 
Small  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n  Programs and A c t i v i ­
t i e s  B e fo re  t h e  Subcommit tee  on SBA O v e r s i g h t  and 
M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e s  o f  t h e  House Commit tee  on 
S m a l l  B u s i n e s s ,  9 4 t h  C o n g . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  ( 1 9 7 6 ) ;  
H e a r in g s  on P rocu rem en t  A s s i s t a n c e  Programs o f  the  
Sm all  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n  B e f o re  t h e  S e n a t e  
Commit tee  on Small  B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  C ong . ,  1 s t  S e s s .  
( 1 9 7 5 ) ;  H e a r in g s  on M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  and A l l i e d  
Problems o f  Small  B u s i n e s s e s  B e f o re  t h e  Subcom­
m i t t e e  on SBA O v e r s i g h t  and M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  of  
t h e  House Commit tee  on Small  B u s i n e s s ,  94 th  Cong. 
1 s t  S e s s .  ( 1 9 7 5 ) ;  H e a r in g s  on Government  M i n o r i t y  
E n t e r p r i s e  Programs —* F i s c a l  Year  1974,  b e f o r e  
t h e  S u b c o m m i t t e e  on M i n o r i t y  S m a l l  B u s i n e s s  
E n t e r p r i s e s  a n d  F r a n c h i s i n g  o f  t h e  H ouse  Com­
m i t t e e  on Small  B u s i n e s s ,  93rd  Cong . ,  2d S e ss .  
( 1 9 7 4 ) ;  H e a r i n g s  on SBA's  8 ( a )  S u b c o n t r a c t i n g  
Program —  M i n o r i t y  E n t e r p r i s e  b e f o r e  t h e  Subcom­
m i t t e e  on Government  P rocu rem en t  o f  t h e  S e n a te  
C o m m i t t e e  on S m a l l  B u s i n e s s ,  92nd  C o n g . ,  1 s t  
S e s s .  ( 1 9 7 1 ) ;  H e a r in g s  B e fo re  t h e  Subcom mit tee  on 
M i n o r i t y  S m a l l  B u s i n e s s  E n t e r p r i s e s  o f  t h e  
House Commit tee  on Small  B u s i n e s s ,  92nd Cong . ,  1 s t  
S e s s .  ( 1 9 7 1 ) .

1 0 0 /  M i n o r i t i e s  and Women as Government  C o n t r a c ­
t o r s  ( 1 9 75) ; s e e  a l s o  C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l , 
A Look a t  How t h e  Small  B u s i n e s s  A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ' s  
I n v e s t m e n t  Company P r o g r a m  f o r  A s s i s t i n g  D i s a d ­
v a n t a g e d  Bus inessmen I s  W ork ing , pi T) IT (1975).



-  41

p r e c l u d e d  f u r t h e r  e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n  w i t h  r e m e d ia l  

d e v i c e s .  I t  was t o o  l a t e  f o r  new t r a i n i n g  o r  

a i d  f o r  m i n o r i t y  e n t e r p r i s e s  t o  have  any im apc t ,  

and t h e r e  was no t ime t o  s e t  up or  o p e r a t e  any 

complex a d m i n i s t r a t i v e  m a c h i n e r y .  The 10% s e t -  

a s i d e  p r o g r a m  was i n d e e d  f a r  m ore  e f f e c t i v e  

t h a n  t h e  e a r l i e r  p rog ram s ,  c h a n n e l i n g  more con­

t r a c t  d o l l a r s  t o  m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  i n  a few 

months t h a n  th e y  had r e c e i v e d  in  10 y e a r s  u n d e r

t h e  s e c t i o n  8 ( a )  p rogram  of  t h e  Small  B u s i n e s s
AJ . . . 101/A d m i n i s t r a t i o n .------

Under  t h e s e  c i r c u m s t a n c e s ,  C ong res s  had  on ly  

two a l t e r n a t i v e s  — t o  ad o p t  t h e  m i n o i t y  s e t - a s i d e  

c l a u s e ,  as  an e f f e c t i v e  bu t  s h o r t  t e rm  e x p e d i e n t ,  

o r  t o  i n c r e a s e  s p e n d in g  u n d e r  t h e  P u b l i c  Works Act 

w i t h o u t  t h a t  c l a u s e ,  knowing t h a t  t o  so so would 

b o th  underm ine  p a s t  c o n g r e s s i o n a l  e f f o r t s  t o  a id  

m i n o r i t y  b u s i n e s s e s  and d e f e a t  t h e  p r e s e n t  c o n -

101/  C o m p t r o l l e r  G e n e r a l ,  M i n o r i t y  Firms on Loca l  
P u b l i c  Works P r o j e c t  - -  M ixed  R e s u l t s ,  p. 9 
(1979 ) .



-  42 -

g r e s s i o n a l  p u rp o se  t o  r e d u c e  m i n o r i t y  unemploy­

ment .  N e i t h e r  t h e  C o n s t i t u t i o n  n o r  c o n s i d e r a t i o n s  

o f  p u b l i c  p o l i c y  c o m p e l l e d  t h e  l a t t e r  c o u r s e .

CONCLUSION

For  t h e  f o r e g o i n g  r e a s o n s  i t  i s  r e s p e c t f u l l y  

s u b m i t t e d  t h a t  the  judgment  o f  t h e  c o u r t  below 
s h o u l d  be a f f i r m e d .

R e s p e c t f u l l y  s u b m i t t e d ,

JACK GREENBERG 
JAMES M. NABRIT, I I I  
DEBORAH FINS 
ERIC SCHNAPPER 

S u i t e  2030 
10 Columbus C i r c l e  
New York,  New York 10019

VERNON E. JORDAN, JR.
ROBERT L. HARRIS 500 E. 62nd S t r e e t
WILLIAM A. New York,  New York 10021

BORDERS, JR.

Of Counse l
Counse l  f o r  Amici  C u r i ae



MEILEN PRESS INC. —  N. Y. C. 219

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top