Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Voting Rights Lawyers and Scholars Re Recent 2 Decisions (Harris v. Graddick and Chisom v. Roemer)

Correspondence
July 12, 1988

Cite this item

Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Voting Rights Lawyers and Scholars Re Recent 2 Decisions (Harris v. Graddick and Chisom v. Roemer) preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
Case
- Lani Guinier Correspondence
U.S. state
- General
Collection
- Legal Department General
Taxonomy
Identifier
- c5292906-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Voting Rights Lawyers and Scholars Re Recent 2 Decisions (Harris v. Graddick and Chisom v. Roemer), 1988. c5292906-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ce32ccd6-c8a0-4e21-bab3-db0a6b04eae9/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-voting-rights-lawyers-and-scholars-re-recent-2-decisions-harris-v-graddick-and-chisom-v-roemer. Accessed December 05, 2025.

Copied!

'efense
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 o (2121219-1900

July 12, l-988

TO: Voting Rights Lawyers and Scholars

FROM: Pam Xarlan @
RE: RecentS2Decisj_ons

I am enclosing copies of two favorable district courtopinions handed down earlier this month. Harris v. Graddickr 51Sy9u probabry know from the two previous reported opinions,charrenged the treatment of black voters in arabama.specificarry, it attacked the failure to appoint brack polring
officials, restrictions on voter assistancef and a fivelminut6limit on tirne spent in a voting booth. Judge Thornpsonrsdiscussion of !h" pervasiveness of the injury clused by thestate's intentional discrimination, and the -necessity of acorrespondingly broad remedy, see slip op. at L6 and 21-, isparticularly he1pfuI.

chisom v. Roemer charlenges the use of a multi-memberdistrict to elect two justices to the Louisiana Supreme Court.
The attached opinion granted plaintiffs' motion for J preliminary
injunction harting the upcoming election. There are sometroulrl j--ng passages in Judge Schwartz rs opinion--e.g. , hisskepticism about the use of regressionar Lnalysis--uut theirreparable injury, public interesL, and barancing test parts ofthe dj-scussion may be helpful.

Finally, for light readlng, I am enclosing a copy of the
book review Peyton Mccrary and r did of Abby Thernstrom.

I shall be starting at UVA Law School this fall.
number there is (804) 924-78toi my address is:

My phone

Pam Karlan
University of Virginia School of Law
Charlottesville, VA 2290L

ContribUions an d.eductiblzlor U.S. iruomz tarpurpoaee.

The NAACP Legal Delense & Educaiional Fund, lnc. (LOF) is not part ol the National Association for tho Mvancomont ol Colorod Poople (NAACP) although
LDFwaslounded bythe NAACPand sharGs its commitment to oqual rights. LDF has had lor overfl) years a separato Board, program, statl, oflice and budgel.

Natioml Ollbera
ROBEBT H. PREISKEL

Preaidtnl

WII,EY A, BRANTON
Vbe Preeklnt

BILLYE SUBER AARON
Atlenta, Gsr8i8

ANTHONY G. AMSTERDAM
New York. New York

CLARENCE AVANT
las Angeles, California

MARIO L BAEZA
New York, New York

JOHN T. BAKER
Blmmington. Indiana

ALICE M. BEASLEY
San Frgncisco. California

MANY FRANCES BERBY
Wuhington, D.C.

ANITA LYONS BONDS
St. Irui8, Mimuri

HELEN L. BUTTENWIESER
New York, New York

JACK G, CLARKE
New York. New York

DR. I. H. CLAYBORN
Dallas, Texu

WILLIAM K. COBLENTZ
San Francisco, Calilornia

TAI,BOT D'ALEMBEBTE
Tellahme. Florida

ALI,ISON S. DAVIS
Chicago, Illinoia

OSSIE DAVIS
New Rochelle. New York

PETER J. DeLUCA
White PlBins, New York

ADRIAN W DeIVIND
New York, New York

ANTHONY DOWNS
\{uhington, D.C.

ROBERT F. DRINAN, S.J.
Wshington, D.C.

CHARLES T. DUNCAN
\{uhington, D.C.

KENNETH C. EDELIN, M.D.
BGton. MaschusttJ

MARIAN WRIGHT EDELMAN
Wshington, D.C.

CHRISTOPHER F. EDLEY
New York, New York

DR. HELEN G. EDMONDS
Cambridge, Msschusetts

DAVID E. F'EI.LER
Berkeley, Californie

CLARENCE FINI,EY
New York, New York

NORMAN C. }'RANCIS
New Orleans. huieisna

"COMMITTEE OF 1OO"

Henry Aaron
Steve Allen
Arthur R. Ashe
JGn Bsez
Birch Bayh
Vivien J. Beamon
Harry Belafonte
Seul Bellow
Irrone Bennett. Jr.
John C. Bennett
Viola W. Bernerd
lanard Bernrtein
Hane A. Bethe
Julisn Bond
Henry T. Bourne
Gorge P Brckway
Yvonne Brathwsile Burke
Helen L. Buttenwieser
Diahann Carrotl

Eiecutitn OlJbe.rs

JULIUS Tf, VONNE CHAMBERS
Director-('utmel

JAMES M. NABRIT, III
Aeeqiab Areclr-Cruwl

Board oJ Directms
MARVIN E, FRANKEL

New York. New York

DB. JOHN HOPE FNANKLIN
Durham. North Carolina

J. THOMAS FRANKLIN
Bost n, MssachusettE

RONALD T. GAUUI
New York, New York

JACK GBEENBERG
New York, New York

GORDON G. GREINER
Denver. Colorado

LUCY D. HACKNEY
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

CHARLES V. HAMII.,TON
New York, New York

ELIOT HUBBARD, III
Lincoln. Masachu*tts

ANN HUTCHINSON
New York, New York

HERMAN JOHNSON
Kansas City, Miesouri

JET"IA N. JONES
Chicago, Illinoir

DR. ANNA J. JT'LIAN
Oak P8rk, lllinois

HARRY KAHN
New York. New York

NICH0LAS deB. KATZENBAOH
Morristown, New Jersey

DAVID T]. KENDALL
Washington, D.C.

CONNIE S. LINDAU
New York, New York

ROBERT McDOUGAL. JR.
Chicago, Illinois

GEORGE E. MARSHALL. JR.
Ic Angelee. California

ROBERT C. MAYNARD
Oaklend, California

BISHOP PAUL MOORE, JR.
New York. New York

DR. JAMES M. NABRIT. JR.
Washington, D.C.

MRS. ELLIOT"T M. OGDEN, JR.
New York, New York

BARRINGTON D. PARKER. JR.
New York, New York

MARTIN D. PAYSON
New York. New York

STEPHNN J. POLLAK
Wuhington. D.C.

ROBERT S. POTTER
New York. New York

Hmmary BwrdMmtn
DOROTHY ROSENMAN

National OlJitere
WILLIAM T COLEMAN, JR.

Chuirmn olllu Bmrd.

HARRIET RABB
Setrelary

ELEANOR S. APPLEWHAITE
Tleaarrer

HUGH B. PRICE
New York, New York

GLENDORA McILI{AIN PUTNAM
Bcton. Masachustts

DANIEL L. RABINOWITZ
Newark, New Jeroey

C. CARL RANDOLPH
New York, New York

GILBERT T. RAY
las Angeles, California

NORMAN REDLICH
New York. New York

CHARLES B. RENFREW
Sen Francirco. California

HARVEY C. RUSSELL
Yonkero, New York

BAYARD RUSTIN
New York. New York

WILLIAM H. SCHEIDE
Princeton, New Jer*y

FREDERICK A. O. SCHWARZ
New York. New York

BERNARD G. SECAL
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

JACOB SHEINKMAN
New York. New York

DR. GEORGE C. SIMKINS. JR.
Greensborc, North Carolina

WAYMAN N SMITH
St. huis, Misuri

MICHAEL I. SOVERN
New York, New York

CHUCK STONE
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

JAY TOPKIS
New York. New York

CYRUS R. VANCE
New York, New York

JAMES VORENBER(i
Cambridce, MNchus€tts

JOHN W WALKER
Little Rmk, Arkanss

DR. ROBERT C. WEAVER
New York, New York

M. MORAN WESTON. Ph.D.
New Rochelle, New York

ROGER W. \ryILKINS
Washington, D.C.

E. THOMAS WILI,IAMS. JR.
New York. New York

KARNN HASTIE WILLIAMS
l{ashington, D.C.

ANDREW YOUNG
Atlsnt3, Gergia

James E. Chek
Shirley Chisholm
Ramsey Clark
Aaron Copland
Bill Cosby
Maxwell Dane
Oagie Davis
Ruby Dee
Victoria DeIe
Rrlph Ellimn
John Hom Franklin
Mm. A. C. Gaston
Kenneth A. Gibrcn
Roland B. Gittelrchn
Charles E. fuell
John Hemmond
Richard G. Hatcher
Theodore M. Hesburgh

Merilvn Horne
John fi. Johnmn
Mro. Percy Julian
Horace M. Kellen
Ethel Kennedy
James lewrence. Jr.
Max l*rner
W. Arthur I*wis
Sarah larkin lcning
John A. Mackay
Homce S. Mange
Henry L. Maruh, lll
Williem James McGill
Linde B. McK6n
Ksrl Menninger
Charle Merrill
Arthur Mitchell
Anthony Newley

Chairman, BISHOP PAUL MOORE. JB

Paul Newman
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Richsrd L Ottinger
len E. Psnetta
Gordon A. B. Parkc
Sidnev Poitier
Jmp6 L Rauh, Jr.
Carl T Rowan
John L. Saltonstell, Jr.
William H. Scheide
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
Charler E. Silberman
John P Spiegel
William Styron
Telford T[ylor
Robert Penn Warren
Robert C. \{eaver
Ttrm Wicker
Myrlie Evers Williams

The "Committee of 100", e voluntary cooperative g:roup of individuals, headed by Bishop Paul Moore, Jr.,
hassponsored the appeal ofthe N.A.A.C.P. tegal Defense end Educational Fund, Inc. since 1943 toenable the
Fund to put intooperation a progrsm designed to mske desegreg:ation a reality throughout the United States.

A8 of June 23. 198?

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Voting Rights Lawyers and Scholars Re Recent 2 Decisions (Harris v. Graddick and Chisom v. Roemer)

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in