Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories

Public Court Documents
August 24, 1992

Cite this item

Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Sheff v. O'Neill
Case
- Sheff v. O'Neill
U.S. state
- Connecticut
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1ea9fe81-a146-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Connecticut, Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories, 1992. 1ea9fe81-a146-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d1d281d0-f503-41d0-9d99-531921883fb3/notice-of-service-of-plaintiffs-second-amended-responses-to-defendants-first-set-of-interrogatories. Accessed September 18, 2025.

Copied!

    * * 

Cv89-0360977S 

  

MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT 

Plaintiffs 

v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF 

HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN 

WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD 

08
 

O0
0 

00
 

@0
 

09
 

08
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

00
 

Defendants AUGUST 24, 1992 

ee 
eo

 

  

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED RESPONSES 
TO DEFENDANTS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 
  

  

Plaintiffs hereby give notice pursuant to Connecticut Practice 

Book Section 224 that they have responded to defendants’ First Set 

of Interrogatories in the following way: 

1. Plaintiffs have objected to interrogatories 8, 9, and 10, 

by objection filed September 20, 1990. 

2. Plaintiffs have objected in part to interrogatory 20, by 

objection filed September 20, 1990. 

3. Plaintiffs have answered interrogatories 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 

7,1}, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 by service of 

Plaintiffs Second Amended Responses to Defendants’ First Set of 

Interrogatories on defendants’ counsel on August 24, 1992. 

  

  

 



      

Wesley W. Horton 
Moller, Horton, & Rice 
90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Julius L. Chambers 
Marianne Lado 

Ron Ellis 
NAACP Legal Defense & 

Educational Pund, Inc. 
99 Hudson Street 

New York, NY 10013 

Helen Hershkoff 

John A. Powell 

Adam Cohen 

American Civil Liberties 
Union Foundation 

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10036 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Man th a Some. 
  

Philip D. Tegeler 
Martha Stone 

Connecticut Civil Liberties 

Union Foundation 

32 Grand Street 
Hartford, .CT 06106 

Wilfred Rodriguez 
Hispanic Advocacy Project 
Neighborhood Legal Services 
1229 Albany Avenue 
Hartford, CT 06112 

John Brittain 
University of Connecticut 

School of Law 
65 Elizabeth Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Ruben Franco 
Ken Kimerling 
Sandra Del Valle 

Puerto Rican Legal Defense 
Educational Fund 

99 Hudson Street 

New York, NY 10013 

  

  

  
  

 



      

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
  

This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been 

mailed postage prepaid to John R. Whelan and Martha M. Watts, 

Assistant Attorney Generals, MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman Street, 

Hartford, CT 06105 this J7 day of August, 1992. 

M aA to JYINS 

  

  

Martha Stone

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in