Joint Motion for Entry of Proposed Interim Plan; Correspondence from House Members to Mattox; Statement Regarding State Defendants; Notice of Appeal

    MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMESB \ 
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

30 CONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE 2080 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870! 

TELERHONE BIR-3R0-8088 

  

YELECOPIE® B12-320-B01) 

TELECOPY COVER SHEET 

ours, (oo [29 
  

  
so Soil Till [1 Che 
FIRM NAME: City a State: 

TELEPHONE: Telecopier Phone: [2/2 \2% 7570 

FROM: b. MeDomald 

TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including this page) 

  
  

  

  

  

TIME OF TRANSMITTAL: AM/PM 
  

COMMENTS:   

  

  

IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 

TELERCOPY OPERATOR: 

(512) 320-5032 
  

XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 
(612) 320-3013 

Client #: 
CONFIRMED WITH: 

  

Matter #: TIME:   
  

INITIALS: 
  

 



    
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

JIM MATTOX 

ATTORNEY GENERAL December 21. 1989 RZoZIVED 

U.S. District Clerk WA TTHENS 2 JRANGUCH. 

200 East Wall Street, Room 316 

Midland, Texas 79701 

Re: LULAC #4434, et al. v. Mattox, et al., 

Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced matter are the 

original and one copy of: (a) a joint motion for the entry of the 

Proposed Interim Plan, which today is being mailed under separate 

cover; and (b) a statement regarding the state defendants other than 

the Attorney General. The Attorney General of Texas is not 

submitting a proposed order with the joint motion. The plaintiffs 

and plaintiff-intervenors are submitting their own proposed order to 

accompany the joint motion. It has not been reviewed by the 

Attorney General. 

Sinc    
/ 

oh 
Renea Hicks \ 

Special Assistant Attorney General 

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station 
Austin, Texas 78711-2548 

(512) 463-2085 

cc: Counsel of Record 

X18/4G85-23100 SUPREME COURT BUILDING AUSTIN, TEXAN THR7I1=-2308 

 



  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 
MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION 

LULAC COUNCIL #4434, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

Civil Action No. 

MO-88-CA-154 
VS. 

JIM MATTOX, et al., 

Defendants. e
O
0
 

OR
 

CO
? 

LO
D 

CO
N 

CO
B 

TO
» 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROPOSED INTERIM PLAN 

The plaintiffs, the plaintiff-intervenors, and the Attorney 

General of Texas on behalf of the State of Texas hereby jointly move 

the Court to enter an order adopting and implementing the Proposed 

Interim Plan which they have filed today with the Court. The 

grounds follow: 

1. The Court's memorandum opinion and order of November 

8, 1989, as modified by the order of November 27, 1989 ("November 

8th order"), declared that the current system for electing judges to 

the district courts in the Texas counties of Harris, Dallas, Tarrant, 

Bexar, Travis, Jefferson, Lubbock, Ector, and Midland violated Section 

2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, by illegally diluting 

minority voting strength. | 

2. . Pursuant to the Court's directive that any proposed 

remedial plans be submitted to the Court no later than December 22, 

1989, the below-signed counsel have prepared and submitted to the 

Court a Proposed Interim Plan ("Plan"). We urge the Court's adoption 

of the Plan. 

 



  

3. The Plan harmonizes the current method for electing 

district judges in Texas with the Court's November 8th order insofar 

as possible. In this way, the Plan's objective is to provide an interim 

remedy to those whose voting rights the Court declared are violated 

by the current system and, within the confines of that declaration, to 

otherwise minimize the disruption of the current electoral system for 

district judges in the nine affected counties. To that end, the Plan: 

a, Limits the terms of office of those elected under its 

terms to two years instead of the four years provided under the 

Texas Constitution, in an effort to give the State Legislature the 

maximum flexibility to devise a permanent remedial plan in its next 

regular session in 1991; 

b. Retains countywide residency requirements but 

waives electoral subdistrict residency requirements; 

gc Retains countywide jurisdiction and venue; 

d. Retains the system of electing judges by party 

primary and general election; 

e. Permits incumbent judges running for district 

judgeships in 1990 to choose the electoral subdistrict in which they 

will run and permits them, if reelected: to retain their current 

district court number and their current docket-type specialization; 

and : 

f, Permits a limited, one time per party right of 

recusal of an assigned judge elected under the interim plan, modeled 

after a Texas statute concerning recusal of visiting trial judges. 

 



4. The Plan remedies for the 1990 clections the voting 

rights violations found by the Court on November 8th in the 

following manner: 

a. Eliminates countywide district judge elections in the 

nine affected counties, substituting in their place elections from 

subdistricts. The subdistricts are created using existing state 

legislative district, justice of the peace precinct, and county 

commissioner precinct lines, all of which have received preclearance 

from the United States Department of Justice under Section 5 of the 

Voting Rights Act; and 

b. Allocates the places for which judicial candidates 

may run according to the percentage of combined minority voting 

age population in the election subdistrict as reported in the 1980 

Census. The subdistricts are ranked by county in descending order 

of combined minority voting age population, and the places are 

allocated in that descending order until all have been allocated. In 

this way, those voters whose rights the Court determined have been 

violated receive first preference. 

5. The Plan also attempts to reflect the policy choice of the 

State Legislature. Attachment A 10 this motion is a statement signed 

by a majority (16 of 31 members) of the Texas Senate supporting the 

Plan's concept and its adoption. Attachment B to this motion is a list 
iy | 

showing 71 of 150 members of the Texas House of Representatives 

(with more anticipated) supporting the Plan's concept and its 

adoption,  



  

Based upon the foregoing matters, the plaintiffs, the plaintiff- 

intervenors, and the Attorney General of Texas on behalf of the State 

of Texas urge the Court to grant this joint motion and adopt their 

Proposed Interim Plan for the 1990 judicial elections in the nine 

affected counties. 

Respectfully submitted, 

(Jo Mott 
JIM MATTOX 
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

 ollutlher . 
WILLIAM C. GARRETT (wf fativwiitin 

g ROLANDO L. RIOS 
SUSAN FINKELSTEIN 

  

  

dy WSU 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND, FOR 
THIS MOTION, ON BEHALF OF THE 
ATTORNEYS FOR DALLAS PLAINTIFF- 
INTERVENORS AND THE ATTORNEYS FOR 
HARRIS PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS 

 



  

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on this 21st day of December, 1989, I sent a copy 
of the foregoing document by overnight courier to each of the 
following: William L. Garrett, Garrett, Thompson & Chang, 8300 
Douglas, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75225; Rolando Rios, Southwest 
Voter Registration & Education Project, 201 N. St. Mary's, Suite 521, 
San Antonio, Texas 78205; Sherrilyn A. Ifill, NAACP Legal Defense 
and Educational Fund, Inc., 99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor, New York, 
New York 10013; Gabrielle K, McDonald, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 
2050, Austin, Texas 78701; Edward B. Cloutman, III, Mullinax, Wells, 
Baab & Cloutman, P.C., 3301 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas 75226-1637; J. 
Eugene Clements, Porter & Clements, 700 Louisiana, Suite 3500, 
Houston, Texas 77002-2730; and Robert H. Mow, Jr., Hughes & Luce, 
2800 Momentum Place, 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. 

= Hicks yD 
  

 



    

  

  

  

. +. ATTACHMENT A é $® ED 
pect 

pret Bo & 
EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON : (el CAPITOL OFFICE 

SENATOR r gL Chr Senute nt QENER P.O. Box ib; 
DISTRICT 23 Austin Texas 7871 

: 512/4630122 
Commirtens Chr State uf Crxas 
EDUCATION 4 SisrmoY OFFICE 

ubeammires: December 8, 1589 4053'S. Zan3 Biv 
Basen Ae no Dua Torn 520k 
Muman Bervices 

HEALYH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES wo whom It May Concern: 

We, the undersigned members of the Texas Legislature, 

support the concept outlined in S5.B. 42, 71st Legislature, 
2nd Called Session; a common-sense interim solution to the 
LULAC, et al v. Mattox decision on selection of district 

judges in nine Texas counties. This legislation offers an 
interim plan using existing district lines for only those 
judges up for election in 1990. A final plan would be / 
developed in 1991 wing ell 

ahd EE 
line Yost. = ATE al 

> sa [ Ist hen A 

+ OER 
tall ie? LL [eurty 

  

     
    

    

    

    

  

    

    

  
  

 



   

  

ATTACHMENT B 
  

    
AN = Ta pe 

The SHeate of Texas 
Raph R. Wallace, J} House of Representatibes Committees: 

Austin, Texas Culrural § Historical Resources 
Chairman, 

Chairman 

Democratic Caucus ; Financial lastirutions 

December 21, 1989 

The Honorable Jim Mattox 
Attorney General, State of Texas 
Attorney General's Office 
Austin, Texas 78701 

Dear General Mattox: 

In conjunction with several members of the Texas House of 

Representatives, my staff and others have been polling members of the 

Texas House to determine support for H.B. 113 and your proposed 

interim plan for selecting district judges in nine Texas counties, as 

represented by the proposal endorsed by LULAC and other plaintiffs. 

Ne The undersigned House members believe this plan represents a 

viable, interim plan although it may not reflect each member,s exact 

preference for a final, long-term solution. 

Despite the difficulty finding House members due to the holiday 

season, each of the members listed below has either co-authored H.B. 

112, signed a letter supporting that legislation, or made a verbal 

commitment to support the interim plan. In addition six House members 

expressed support but wished not to be listed for political reasons or 

because they have cases pending before affected district judges. 

  

The total number of members, listed and unlisted, is 71, and I 

am confident that at least 76 members, a majority of the Bouse, will 

express support for the interim plan when we are able to reach them 

after the Christmas holiday. We will provide additional names at a 

later date should you neeed them. 

2 a t——— 

BAT ARE Rr 
' St. Rep. Ralph Wallace 

Sincerely, 

  

Attachement: List of House Members 

Capitol Office: P.O. Box 2910 + Austin, Texas 78768-2910. 512-463-0732 

District Office: P.O. Box 12667 « Houston, Texas 77217 « 713-644-2359 

 



  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 
MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION 

LULAC COUNCIL #4434, et al, 8 
Plaintiffs, 

VS. 8 Civil Action No. 
§ MO-88-CA-154 

JIM MATTOX, et al, § 
Defendants. § 

STATEMENT REGARDING STATE DEFENDANTS 

This statement is submitted on behalf of all the state defendants in this case other 

than the Attorney General of Texas Jim Mattox. None of them has joined in the Artorney 

General's submission to the Gofnt today of a Proposed Interim Plan and a joint motion 

urging the interim plan's adoption. Some have submitted their own remedial proposals 

directly to the Court. Chief Justice Phillips's December 15th submission in his personal 

capacity is an example of this approach. 

-, 

Respectfully submitted, 

JIM MATTOX 
Attorney General of Texas 

MARY F. KELLER . 
Firs istant Attorney General : 

: - pa «0. 

ip “"RENEA RICKS 
Special Assistant Attorney General 

JAVIER GUAJARDO 
Assistant Attorney General 

  

P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station 
Austin, Texas 78711-2548 

(512) 463-2085 

ATTORNEYS FOR STATE DEFENDANTS 

 



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on this 21st day of December, 1989, I sent a copy of the foregoing 
document by overnight courier to each of the following: William L. Garret, Garrett, 
Thompson & Chang, 8300 Douglas, Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75225; Rolando Rios, 
Southwest Voter Registration & Education Project, 201 N. St. Mary's, Suite 521, San 
Antonio, Texas 78205; Sherrilyn A. Ifill, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 
Inc., 99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor, New York, New York 10013: Gabrielle K. 
McDonald, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 2050, Austin, Texas 78701; Edward B. 
Cloutman, III, Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman, P.C., 3301 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas 
75226-1637; J. Eugene Clements, Porter & Clements, 700 Louisiana, Suite 3500, 
Houston, Texas 77002-2730; and Robert H. Mow, Jr., Hughes & Luce, 2800 Momentum 
Place, 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201. 

hn Bra, 
  

Renea Hicks af. | 

 



   
OF TEXAS 

JIM MATTOX 
ATTORNEY GENERAL December 21, 1989 

VI RE 

United States District Clerk 

200 East Wall, Room 316 

Federal Building 

Midland, Texas 79701 

Re: LULAC Council #4434 v. Mattox, No. MO-88-CA-154 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Enclosed for filing in the above referenced matter are the original 
and one copy of the State Defendants’ Notice of Appeal. Also enclosed is a 
check for $105.00 payable to the United States District Court for fees 
associated with the appeal. 

a Hicks | 
Special Assistant Attorney General 

Si      

    

'P. 0. Box 12548, Capitol Station 
- Austin, Texas 78711-2548 

(512) 463-2085 

ce: Counsel of Record 

 



  

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 
MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION 

LULAC COUNCIL #4434, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 

Civil Action No. 

MO-88-CA-154 

VS. 

JIM MATTOX, et al., : 

Defendants. 

L
O
N
 

CO
O 

CO
” 

CO
D 

BO
N 

LO
B 

LO
N 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given that Jim Mattox, Attorney General of the State 

of Texas, George Bayoud, Secretary of State of the State of Texas, Thomas R. 

Phillips, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas, Mike McCormick, 

Presiding Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals, Ron Chapman, Presiding Judge 

of the Ist Administrative Judicial Region, Thomas J. Stovall, Jr., Presiding 

Judge of the 2nd Administrative Judicial Region, James F. Clawson, Jr. 

Presiding Judge of the 3rd Administrative Judicial Region, John Cornyn, 

Presiding Judge of the 4th Administrative Judicial Region, Robert 

Blackmon, Presiding Judge of the 5th Administrative Judicial Region, Sam 

B. Paxson, Presiding Judge of the 6th Administrative Judicial Region, 

Weldon Kirk, Presiding Judge of -the 7th Administrative Judicial Region, Jeff 

Walker, Presiding Judge of the 8th Administrative Judicial Region, Ray D. 

Anderson, Presiding Judge of the 9th Administrative Judicial Region, and 

Joe Spurlock II, President, Texas Judicial Council, hereby appeal to -the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the Court's 

Memorandum Opinion: and Order of November 8, 1989, as modified by the 

Court's Order of November 27, 1989. 

 



  

Respectfully submitted, 

JIM MATTOX 
Attorney General of Texas 

MARY F. KELLER 
Eir stant Attorney General 

J 

RENEA HICKS : 

Special Assistant Attorney General 

  

JAVIER GUAJARDO 

Assistant Attorney General 

P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station 
Austin, Texas 78711-2548 
(512) 463-2085 

ATTORNEYS FOR STATE DEFENDANTS 

Date: December 21, 1089, 

 



   
Ralph-R. ‘Wallese, I] Bouse of Representatives | Commirtees: 

Austin, Trxas Cultural & Historica! Resources 

Chairman, 
Chairman 

Democratic Caucus Financial Instucutions 

Rep. Alexander Rep. Linebarger 
Rep. Beauchamp Rep. Lucio 
Rep. Berlanga Rep. Luna, A. 
Rep. Blair Rep. Madla 
Rep. Cain : Rep. Martinez 
Rep. Cavazos Rep. Luna, G. 
Rep. Chisum ~ Rep. McDonald 
Rep. Colbert Rep. McKinney 
Rep. Collazo Rep. Melton 
Rep. Conley Rep. Morales 
Rep. Counts Rep. Moreno, A. 
Rep. Cuellar, H. Rep. Moreno, P. 
Rep. Cuellar, R. © Rep. Oakley 
Rep. Delco Rep. Parker 
Rep. Denton Rep. Patterson 
Rep. Dutton - Rep. Perez 
Rep. Earley Rep. Rangel 
Rep. Edge Rep. Rodriguez 
Rep. Edwards Rep. Russell 
Rep. Evans Rep. Saunders 
Rep. Garcia Rep. Seidlits 
Rep. Gavin Rep. Swift 
Rep. Glossbrenner Rep. Telford 
Rep. Granoff Rep. Thompson, G. 
Rep. Guerrero Rep. Thompson, S. 
Rep. Barrison Rep. Wallace 
Rep. Hightower | Rep. Warner 
Rep. Hinojosa Rep. Willis 
Rep. Hudson, D. Rep. Wilson 
Rep. Hudson, S. yd Rep. Wolens 
Rep. Johnson, J. 
Rep. Junell 
Rep. Laney 
Rep. Larry 
Rep. Lewis, R. 

In addition, we have positive commitments from six members who 
do not want their names listed at this time. 

Further, two house members endorsed the major aspects of the 

interim plan but refused to be counted as supporting this specific 

plan at this time. 

Capitol Office: P.O. Box 2910 + Austin, Texas 78768-2910 512-463-0732 

District Office: P.O. Box 12667 « Houston, Texas 77217 + 713-644-2359