Motion to Intervene as Party Plaintiff and Motion to Realign Parties
Public Court Documents
August 25, 1969
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Motion to Intervene as Party Plaintiff and Motion to Realign Parties, 1969. aae8542a-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d28474c6-0bd8-41b4-8570-95cdb49dffb7/motion-to-intervene-as-party-plaintiff-and-motion-to-realign-parties. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
VS. CIVIL ACTION
NG. 3807
NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al,
MOTION TO INTERVENE
AS PARTY PLAINTIFFS
AND MOTION
TO REALIGN PARTIES
1. This motion is made pursuant to Rules 21 and 24(a) and
{b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2. The following named Negro children attending schools
located within the North Pike County School District move this
Court to intervene as party plaintiffs in the above captioned
cause:
George Magee, Jr., Marvan Jean Magee, Barbara Gale
Magee, by their father, George Magee.
3. In support of this Motion the said children allege that:
a) they have an interest in the outcome of this liti-
cation;
b) they have a right to a unitary school system and a
right to the immediate implementation of the HEW plan of desegre-
pation submitted to the Court;
c) it is apparent from the motion of the United States
Lo withdraw the HEW plan of desegregation that rights of Negro
rhildren are not adequately represented by the United States.
> »
4. Unless this Court permits the intervention of private
plaintiffs the proceeding will not be adversarial in nature and
there will be no "case or controversy" cognizable in this Court
under Article Three of the Constitution of the Unlted States.
5. The named Negro children further move this Court to
realign the parties making the United States a party defendant
in this action:
a) it is apparent from the motion of the United States
to withdraw the HEW plan of desegregation that the interests and
objectives of the United States and defendant school district co-
incide and that they both seek to delay the implementation of
movants right to a unitary integrated school district by the com-
mencement of the 1969-70 school year.
WHEREFORE, named children move this Court to:
1. Enter an order naming them as party plaintiffs in this
cause;
2. Realign the parties making the United States a party
defendant.
UHecoud 24; 1967 REUBEN V. ANDERSON
/ FRED L. BANKS, JR.
{ MELVYN R. LEVENTHAL
JOHN A. NICHOLS
538% North Farish Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39202
JACK GREENBERG
NORMAN AMACKER
NORMAN CHACHKIN
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019