Letter from Fancher Jr. to Judges Bell, Thornberry and Morgan RE: Filing of Amended Desegregation Plan and Motion for Modification
Public Court Documents
November 11, 1969

1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Pursue Discovery, 1992. 59c6777e-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/49ea4490-a25b-40e6-bf4d-62f3debbd777/defendants-motion-for-extension-of-time-in-which-to-pursue-discovery. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
: : S35 MacKenzie Hall RICHARD BLUMENTIIAI abide sa oe : 110 Sherman Street ATFORNEY GENERAL 3 gE Hartford. CT 06103 FAX (203) 523-553 ( Mice of The Attorney ( yc1eral ; he 4 Tel: 566-7173 State of Connecticut July 14,°1992 The Honorable Harry Hammer Judge of the Superior Court P. O. Box 325 Rockville, Connecticut 06066 RE: Sheff v., O'Neill Dear Judge Hammer: Enclosed please find a copy of Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time within which to Pursue Discovery, which was filed today in Superior Court. Very truly yours, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL mgd a ar. / 7 ftha Ma MMW: sad Enc. co All Counsel of Record NO. CV-89-0360977 S MILO SHEFF, ET Al. : SUPERIOR COURT : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, ET AL. 3 JULY 14, 71992 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO PURSUE DISCOVERY The defendants move for an extension of time up to and including September 1, . 1992 in ‘which. to serve all further Interrogatories and Requests for Production, and to serve and file with the court all Requests for Admission. This additional time is necessary because plaintiffs are not scheduled to file "full and up to date supplemental responses" to defendants' first set of Interrogatories until August 15, 1992, see Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Order of Compliance dated June 12, 1992 and Findings and Orders of the ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED Ccurt dated June 18, 1992, and plaintiffs' supplemental responses may raise issues that will warrant further discovery. Defendants' counsel have communicated with plaintiffs’ counsel, who represent that they object to this motion for extension of time. FOR THE DEFENDANTS RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL ZL fii Ll / &Ttha M. Watts - Jurdis406172 [Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, Connecticut 06105 Tel, 566-7173 ORDER 1] 1 I For good cause shown the foregoing motion 1s hereby GRANTED /DENIED. By the Court CERTIFICATION This is copy oi the foregoing was record: John Brittain, Esq. University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, "CT 06105 Philip Tegeler, Esq. Martha Stone, Esq. Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06105 Ruben Franco, Esq. Jenny Rivera, Esq. Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund 99 Hudson Street 14th Floor New York, NY 10013 John A. P.well, Esq. Helen Hershkoff, Esq. Adam S§. Cohen, Esq. American Civil Liberties Union 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 to: certify ‘that: on this 14th day of July, / 19892 ‘a mailed to the following counsel of Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. Hispanic Advocacy Project Neighborhood Legal Services 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT . 06112 Wesley W. Horton, Moller, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT . 06105 Esq. Julius L. Chambers, Marianne Lado, Esq. Ronald Ellis, Esq. Esq. NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Education Fund, 99 Hudson Street New York, Inc. NY 10013 State of Connecticut ATTORNEY GENERAL MacKENZIE HALL 110 SHERMAN STREET HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06105 Julius L. Chambers Esq Marianne Lado Esqg Ronald Ellis Esg NAACP Legal Defense Fund & Ed. Fund, 99 Hudson Street New York NY 10013