Letter From Everett to Smiley RE: Interrogatories

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- b231284f-f90e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter From Everett to Smiley RE: Interrogatories, 1999. b231284f-f90e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d399dbd6-1d00-4a9e-88b6-c4162b63455a/letter-from-everett-to-smiley-re-interrogatories. Accessed June 03, 2025.

Copied!

EVERETT & EVERETT
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW

SUITE 300
R.O. EVERETT (1878-1971) 301 W. MAIN ST.
KATHERINE R. EVERETT (1893-1992) : STREET
ROBINSON O. EVERETT P.O. BOX 586
DAWN T. BATTISTE DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27702

TEL: (919) 682-5691 AN 4 SANDRA G. HERRING
FAX: (919) 682-5469

OF COUNSEL

ROBERT D. HOLLEMAN September 1 1999 °

Ms. Tiare B. Smiley

Special Deputy Attorney General

North Carolina Department of Justice

Post Office Box 629

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0629

Re: Cromartie v. Hunt Interrogatories

Dear Tiare:

This letter is to confirm the contents of our phone conference with you and Adam

concerning the Interrogatories we served on both the State Defendants and the Defendant-

Intervenors yesterday, August 31, 1999.

In the interest of coming to a mutual agreement and avoiding any further issues about

what constitutes a “discrete part” of an interrogatory and is therefore separately counted, we are

willing to withdraw Interrogatories #8 and #10 to the Defendant-Intervenors and Interrogatories

#25, #26, #29A and #29D to the State-Defendants.

You indicated that you had some possible objections to interrogatories and we shall await

hearing from you further concerning these possible objections. If we agree that an interrogatory

is objectionable, its elimination will reduce the total. If a hearing is scheduled as to the number of

interrogatories, then these possible objections could also be considered at that time.

If our withdrawal of the above-listed interrogatories does not solve the problem, we will

attempt to arrange for a hearing before Judge Boyle or the Magistrate Judge handling this case to

discuss the interrogatories. As I mentioned, I already have left a call with David Daniel to see

about a possible hearing. Please let us know as soon as possible if a hearing will be necessary.

Sincerely,

(ls 77
Robinson O. Everett

cc. Adam Stein ¢—

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter From Everett to Smiley RE: Interrogatories

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in