Amended Argument Form

Public Court Documents
March 26, 1991

Amended Argument Form preview

3 pages

Includes Correspondence from Hicks to Clerk.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Amended Argument Form, 1991. fc07e748-1e7c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d434e39c-e01e-4f94-8fbb-b926fd72fb19/amended-argument-form. Accessed November 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    State of Texas 

DAN MORALES 
ATTORNEY GENERAL 

March 26, 1991 

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 
Sandy Nelsen, Assistant Clerk 
Supreme Court of the United States 
One First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20543 

  

Re: No. 90-813, Houston Lawyers’ Ass'n v. Attorney General of 
Texas 
No. 90-974, LULAC v. Attorney General of Texas 

Dear Ms. Nelsen: 

Enclosed is an amended Argument Form, which supercedes the 
one I signed and mailed to you on March 11, 1991. 

fa icks 

Special Assistant Attorney General 

ly, 

  

     

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station 
Austin, Texas 78711-2548 
(512) 463-2085 

CC: Counsel of record 

512/463-2100 P.O. BOX 12548 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 

 



AMENDED 
ARGUMENT FORM 

supREM® COURT OF THE uniTES@TATES 

  

TO: “Counsel of Record” 

Please complete all applicable parts of this form and return immediately to: Sandy Nelsen, Assistant Clerk, Supreme Court of 

the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543. 

  

A Case No.: J0-813/Houston Lawyers’ Ass'n, et al. , Attorney General of Texas, et al. 
  

  

  

  

  

  

(Petitioner(s) or Appeliant(s)) 
(Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

Case No.: 90-974/LULAC, et al. v Attorney General of Texas, et al. 

(Petitioner(s) or Appeliant(s)) 
(Respondent(s) or Appeliee(s)) 

Case No.: 
u 

(Petitioner(s) or Appellant(s)) 
(Respondent(s) or Appellee(s)) 

  Date of Argument: April 22, 1997 

Arguing Counsel: Renea Hicks 

(Aust be & Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court or must have been allowed to argue pro hac vice by order of this Court.   

W.-Y 

. or Rina Hiks 
(Preferred Phonetic Pronunciation): 

EX Mr. OJ Ms. OJ Mrs. CJ Miss 

Title. if any: Special Assistant Attorney General 

: : (Solicitor General, Attorney General, City Attorney, etc.) 

P. 0. Box 12548, Capitol Station 

  

  

  

  

  

  

Address: 

Clty and Suate: Dustin, Teves Zip:_78711-2548 

- <elephone: (512) 463-2085 

Were you appointed by this Court? [J Yes No Allowed to argue pro hac vice? [1] Yes KX No 

  Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue: ___S€€ Attachment.” 

  

Please complete the following only if the Court has granted permission for Divided Argument: 

  

  

  

B 
Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue: 

Total Minutes: 

(Name of counsel who will argue first) 

Name of party(ies) for whom counsel will argue: 

Total Minutes: 
  

(Name of counsel who will argue second)       
C Please indicate names of Other Counsel who are members of the Bar of the Supreme Court that arguing counsel wants to have 

seated at Counsel Table: 

Robert H. Mow, Jr. Dallas, ; Texas 
City / State 

  

  

Javier P. Guajardo Austin, yj. JeXBS 
City / State 

D IT IS IMPORTANT THAT ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION BE SUB TO THIS OFFICE WITHOUT DELAY. 

DATE 3h SET SIGNATURE > 
(Counsel of record) 

  

  

  

  
  

  

16001-7-86 

 



ATTACHMENT 

Amended Oral Argument Form 

Name of Parties for Whom Counsel Will Argue 

(all in their official capacities only) 

Atttorney General of Texas (Dan Morales), 

Secretary of State of Texas (John Hannah), and 

Texas Judicial Districts Board 
(Ch. J. Thomas R. Phillips, 

Pr. J. Michael J. McCormick, 

J. Joe Spurlock II, 
Leonard E. Davis, 

JJ. Thomas J. Stovall, Jr., 
B. B. Schraub, 
John Cornyn, 
Darrell Hester, 
Sam B. Paxson, 
Weldon Kirk, 

Jeff Walker, and 
Ray D. Anderson)

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.