Dallas District Judge Entz' Petition for Permission to Appeal
Public Court Documents
January 11, 1990
6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Dallas District Judge Entz' Petition for Permission to Appeal, 1990. f6e4ae4a-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d557268f-d58e-4ce1-ba52-2eb5a36ba670/dallas-district-judge-entz-petition-for-permission-to-appeal. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
HUGHES & LUCE
. 2800 MOMENTUM PLACE
1717 MAIN STREET
DALLAS, TEXAS 7520 900 ONE CONGRESS PLAZA
11 CONGRESS
(214) 939-5500 AUSTIN, TEXAS 7870
FAX (214) 939-6100 (512) 482-6800
TELEX 730836 FAX (512) 482-6859
(214) 939-5581
January 11, 1990
FEDERAL EXPRESS
RECEIPT NO. 9090561734
-
Gilbert F. Ganucheau, Clerk
U. 8S. Court Appeals, 5th Circuit
600 Camp
reet
ans, Louisiana 70130
A Re: League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC),
et al. v. Jim Mattox, et al.
Dear Mr. Ganucheau:
Enclosed please find an original and four copies of
Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant Dallas County District Judge F.
Harold Entz's Petition for Permission to Appeal for the
above-referenced case. Although I understand that
administratively this matter will be assigned its own docket
number, please be advised that it is related to Cause No.
90-8014, presently pending before the Court.
Please return a file-marked copy to me in the enclosed
envelope. Please note that copies of the above document are
being sent by certified mail to the other parties.
Ej trul 5, ery ruly your
David C. Godbey
DCG/pai
Enclosures
HUGHES & LUCE
Gilbert F. Canucheau, Clerk
Page 2
January 11, 1990
CC: (CERTIFIED MAIL RRR)
William L. Garrett
Rolando Rios
pean Finkelstein
jBherrilyn A. 1fill
Gabrielle K. McDonald
Edward B. Cloutman, III
E. Brice Cunningham
Renea Hicks
Ken Oden
David R. Richards
J. Eugene Clements
Darrell Smith
Michael J. Wood
Joel H. Pullen
Seagal V. Wheatley
John L.. Hill, Jr.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS (LULAC), et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
§
§
§
§
§
Vv. § NO.
§
JIM MATTOX, t 1... §
§
§ Defendants-Appellants.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'
PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
Defendant-Intervenor Dallas County District Judge F.
Harold Entz ("Judge Entz"), pursuant to 28 U.S8.C. § 1292 (b)
and Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, files
this Petition for Permission to Appeal as follows:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. This Petition is related to Cause No. 90-8014,
presently pending before this Court. As indicated below, in
making this petition, Judge Entz relies upon and incorporates
by reference certain documents and arguments made in Judge
Entz's Emergency Application for Stay in that appeal. Judge
Entz further notes that the Petition of Judge Wood, previously
pending as Cause No. 90-9003, and now consolidated in Cause
90-8014 (by Order dated January 11, 1990) raised essentially
the same issues presented here, and was granted by the Court
by Order dated January 11, 1990. Judge Entz incorporates by
reference Judge Wood's Petition to Appeal.
JUDGE ENTZ'S PETITION FOR
PERMISSION TO APPEAL - Page 1
2. Following this Court's stay order of January 11,
1990 in Cause No. 90-8014, the district court entered a
further Order, a copy of which is attached to this Petition as
Exhibit "A." That Order purports to "de-certify" the November
8, 1989 order unfer 28 U.S5.C. § 1292(Db). As stated by this
Court in its January 11, 1989 Order (at note 1), this Court
rather than the district court now has jurisdiction.
Accordingly, Judge Entz believes that the district court's
January 11 order does not preclude the instant certification
motion.
3. Certification under section 1292(b) as a practical
matter 1s irrelevant because the district court's order of
January 2, 1990, which granted injunctive relief, is
appealable as of right under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a) (1),
rendering this Petition unnecessary. That result 1s true
regardless whether the district court's January 11 order is
efficacious or not. It is only out of an abundance of caution
that Judge Entz files this Petition for Permission to Appeal
the district court's order entered on November 8, 1989, as
modified for clerical corrections on November 27, 1989,
December 26, 1989 and as referenced in an Order entered by the
district court on January 2, 1990, copies of which orders and
modifications, together with findings of fact, conclusions of
law, and opinion are attached as Exhibits "C" and "H" to Judge
Entz's Emergency Application for Stay, filed in this Court on
January 3, 1990.
JUDGE ENTZ'S PETITION FOR
PERMISSION TO APPEAL - Page 2
3. The facts necessary to an understanding of the
controlling questions of law determined by the district
court's order are as follows:
Judge Entz incorporates by reference his factual
background as set out in his Post-Trial Brief at 1-18, which
brief is filed in this Court as Exhibit "B" to his Emergency
Application For Stay.
q. The questions of law that Judge Entz requests the
Court to decide are as follows:
Judge Entz incorporates by reference his discussion of
the controlling issues of law as set out in his Post-Trial
Brief at 1-24, filed in. this Court as’ Exhibit "B" to his
Emergency Application for Stay.
5. A substantial basis exists for a difference of
opinion on these questions for the following reasons:
Judge Entz incorporates by reference his Post-Trial Brief
at’ 1-183 ‘and his Motion for’ Certification at 2-3 in the
district court, which are attached as Exhibits "B" and "D"
respectively to his Emergency Application for Stay.
6. An immediate appeal may materially advance the
termination of this litigation for the following reasons:
Judge Entz incorporates by reference his Post-Trial Brief
at 1-24 and his Motion for Certification at 1-2, which are
attached as Exhibits "B" and "D" respectively to his Emergency
Application for Stay.
JUDGE ENTZ'S PETITION FOR
PERMISSION TO APPEAL - Page 3
WHEREFORE, Judge Entz requests this court to grant his
Petition for Permission to appeal and to award him such other
relief to which he may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
hela
lg
Robert H. ” Mow,
David C. Ba
Bobby M. Rubarts
Esther R. Rosenblum
of HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 939-5500
ATTORNEYS FOR DALLAS
COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE
F. HAROLD ENTZ
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
instrument was served by certified mail, return receipt
requested on William L. Garrett, Rolando Rios, Susan
Finkelstein, Sherrilyn A. Ifill, Gabrielle K. McDonald, Edward
B. Cloutman, III, E. Brice Cunningham, Renea Hicks, Ken Oden,
David R. Richards, J. Eugene Clements, Darrell Smith, Michael
J. Wood, Joel H. Pullen, and Seagal V. Wheatley in accordance
with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure this - day
ester dl,
a
52800010183
JUDGE ENTZ'S PETITION FOR
PERMISSION TO APPEAL - Page 4