Petition for Rehearing In Banc and for Stay of Proceedings or, in the Alternative, for Recall of Mandate of this Court

    “ United States Uourt of 2s 

FIFTH CIRCUIT 

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. CLERK 
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 

July 25, 1969 

Mr. Robert C, Thomas, Clerk 
U, 8S. District Court 
P, 0, Box 769 
Jackson, Miss, 39205 

Dear Mr, Thomas: 

Nos, 030 and 28042 
U.S. v. Hinds County School Board, et al 
(And Related Cases) 

Enclosed is a certified copy of this Court's 
order entered today in the above referenced 
causes modifying its opinion of July 3, 1969, 
which is self-explanatory, 

Very truly yours, 

EDWARD W, WADSWORTH, Clerk 

y Ledgen A. -, 
Depufy Clerk 
  

/adg 
Encl. 

cc & enc, to: 

All Counsel of Record 

Hon, William Harold Cox 

Hon, Dan M. Russell, Jr, 
Hon, Walter L, Nixon, Jr, 

 



  EXT 

. INGEHE UNITED STATES Court iW: 
FOR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT 

  

Nos, 28030 2 23: (va)
 

OO
 

| 
ww
 

I)
 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve 

HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.’ 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No, 2075(J)) 

  

BUFORD A. LEE, et al., 
Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Ve. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
- Defendant-Appellant, 

Vis 

MILTON EVANS, 
Third Party 

. oh Defendant-Appellee. 

(Civil Action No. 2034 (H)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, , 

. Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. . 

KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., 
Defendants-Appellees. 

{Civil Action No. 1373(E)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve. 

NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED 

SCHOOL, DISTRICT, ef al., 
Defendants-Appelleecs. 

{Civil Action No. 3807(J)) 

 



. 
. 

  

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

V. 

NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE 

SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al., 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1120(W)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve. 

MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et 2l.;, 
Defendants-Appellees. 

{Civil Action No, 217801) 

  re 

JOAN ANDERSON, et al., i: 
Plaintiffs-Appellants; 

. BNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

. Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, 

Vv. 

THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 
and THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. . 

(Civil Action No, 3700(J)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

5 * 

SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED 
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et: al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

{Civil Action lio, 39384(J)) 

 



° 
. 

re er St ee A th nt atl nt 

BEATRICE ALEXANDER, ef al., 
Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

Ve. 
3 

HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., 
: Defendants-Appellees, 

{Civil Action No. 3779(3)) 

a we A mg A 

BOY LEE HARRIS, et al., 
Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

Ve. 

THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., 
| Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1209(VW)) 

  

JOHN BARNHARDT, et al., | 
Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

Ve. 

MERIDIAN’ SEPARATE SCHOOL ‘DISTRICT, et al., 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No, 1300(E)) 

  —— 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve 

NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1396(E)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

vy 

NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1372(E))  



Dr i 

UNITED STATES or AMERY CA, 
. Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve. 

LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DIS TRICY?, et al., 
Defendants Appalices. 

(Civil Action No. 1367(E)) 

tt. he tet ig. eae rn Pe et amin 

DIAN HUDSON, et al., 
Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

UNITED STATES Or AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, 

Ve. 

., LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., 
 Defendants- Aoraliene. 

(Civil Action No, 3382 (J)) 

    

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintife- Appellant, 

V. 

COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, et al. 
Po fendnate -Appellees, 

(Civil Action No, 2199 (H)) 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff- -Appellant, 

Ve 

AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 
Pefendants- capocllices, 

(Civil Action No. 3983 (J))  



  

{ 
¢ 

Brin = eran +a ent 

® UNITED STATES ky 

Pl SI 1ff-Appel 1 ant, 

| v. | 
COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 2148(H)) 

La ——— TE ——— 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve. 

LAVWRERCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 
Defendants- Appellees, 

(Civil Action No. 2216 (i)) 

  

JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR., et al., 
. Plaintiffs~-Appellants, 

V. 

ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No, 1096 (W)) 

  

UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve. 

WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al:, 
Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 1160(W)) 

  

CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, et al., 
Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

. Ve. 

THE ENTERP RISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 
_and QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

{Civil Action No, 1302(F)) 

 



s PF og x 

. 

a a 

  

UNITED STATES OF AMZERICA, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Vv. 
y 

/ 

LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al 

  

"3 

Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 4294 (J)) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . 
Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Ve. 

: : ; t PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE ing ¥ 
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 

: - Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil) Action Ne, 3388(m)) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : go, 
Plaintiff-Appellant, a “io 5. ny 

. v. 

FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 
‘ Defendants-Appellees. 

(Civil Action No. 4256 (J)) 

  a 

Appeals fr om the United States District Court for the. 
Southern District of Mississippi : 

  

(July 25, 1969) 

MODIFICATION OF ORDER 
  

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. 

 



cases on July 3, 

renumbering former paragraph 8 to be 

such order, 

paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 in their entirety, and inserting in lieu 

thereof new paragraphs 5 and 6 which shall read as follows: 

1 agreement is reached, the Office of Education 

a plan for the school 

efore August 

The parties shall have ten (10) days from 

the date such a proposed plan is filed with the dis- 

trict court to file objections or suggested amend- 

ments thereto. The district court shall hold a 

hearing on the proposed plan and any objections and 

suggested amendments thereto, and shall enter a plan 

which conforms to constitutional standards no later 

than ten (10) days after the time for filing objec- 

tions has expired. 

A plan for the school district shall be entered for 

implementation by the district court no later than 

September 1, 1969 and shall be effective for the 

beginning of the 1869-1970 school year, The district 

court shall enter Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 

Law regarding the efficacy of any plan which is 

approved or ordered to immediately disestablish the