Order of Extension of Time to File Motion for Attorneys' Travis County Distrct Judges

Public Court Documents
May 18, 1989

Order of Extension of Time to File Motion for Attorneys' Travis County Distrct Judges preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order of Extension of Time to File Motion for Attorneys' Travis County Distrct Judges, 1989. 6bac6438-1f7c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d636e1a7-0ff5-4c18-af1a-282d34dd0b7b/order-of-extension-of-time-to-file-motion-for-attorneys-travis-county-distrct-judges. Accessed November 07, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAY 18 1989 
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION u 

LULAC, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

NO. MO-88-CA-154 vs. 

MATTOX, et al., 

* 
% 

* 
% 

* 
* 

* 
* 

* 
Defendants. 

ORDER OF EXTENSION OF 
TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ 

TRAVIS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGES 

Upon consideration of all matters of records, the Court has 

determined that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Request for Attorneys’ Fees from Travis County District Judges has 

merit. The extension will avoid unnecessarily complicating the 

preparation of this case in the short time remaining before trial 

begins on July 11, 1989. THEREFORE, the Motion is GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs need not file their Motion for Attorneys’ Fees from the 

Travis County District Judges, if any, in compliance with Local 

Rule 300-10. Instead, if they choose to file a Motion, they may 

file it at the same time that they make other timely Motions for 

fees after the Court has resolved the merits and remedy of this 

case. 

bondiztite Ld y day of Yi , 1989 at Midland, Texas. 

  

  

.S..D CT 

cuchea ppc 
BY cossein 

COURT 

« . DEPUTY 

Be go 

A) 7 27 J y 

A A A ALA - 1/7 4 
  

AF 

ives STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

1s 

 



  

7:88-cv-00154 

Sherrilyn Ifill, Esq. 
Matthews & Branscomb 

no pro hac vice 
99 Hudson St., 16th Floor 

New York, NY 10013 

Sim

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.