Affidavit of Charles J. Wolfe
Public Court Documents
November 21, 1972
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Affidavit of Charles J. Wolfe, 1972. acf2f7d0-53e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d6e585ec-8e12-4142-b2c2-4bfc8355a8cb/affidavit-of-charles-j-wolfe. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
No. 72-8002
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF DETROIT,
a school district of the first
class,
Appellant,
v s .
RONALD BRADLEY, et al,
Appellees.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Michigan
Southern Division
AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES J. WOLFE
No. 72-8002
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF DETROIT,
a school district of the first
class,
Appellant,
vs.
RONALD BRADLEY, et al,
Appellees.
AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES J. WOLFE
State of Michigan )
) s s .
County of Wayne )
CHARLES J. WOLFE,being first duly sworn, deposes
and says as follows:
He is the Superintendent of Schools for the School
District of the City of Detroit and that he is familiar with
the financial situation in the Detroit District as more
specifically set forth in the Affidavit of Harold Brown, Board
of Education Business Manager. Thus, he recognizes that the
school system could not operate because of finances beyond
early March, 1973, and has reviewed the effect of closing
schools in February or early March, 1973, from an educational
standpoint.
Because of the School District's uncertain financial
future, it is difficult to determine whether the schools must
close by early February, by mid-February or by mid-March, 1973.
Such uncertainty is a disaster from an educational viewpoint.
Thus, he, as the District's chief education officer, has deter
mined that it is to the advantage to the school children of the
system that there be some degree of certainty in their course
of instruction. Under these circumstances, this certainty can
best be obtained by splitting the school year into two semesters
rather than one semester and a second semester with an uncertain
ending. He recommended to the school board that the Fall semester
1972 end on December 21, 1972 and that the Spring semester
commence on February 19, 1973, ending sometime in late April
or early May, 1973. Even this plan cuts short the normal Spring
semester ending. Nevertheless, the plan would save about 35
days of school at a saving of a 1-1/4 Million Dollars per
day between December 21, 1972 to February 19, 1973, which 35
days could be tacked to the end of the Spring semester. This,
in turn, would achieve 117 days of instruction, substantially
less than the 180 days ordered by the District Court. Neverthe
less, the course of instruction would be certain and would
relieve anxieties of not knowing when the second semester
-2-
would end. Your affiant prevailed on the Detroit Board of
Education to accept this judgment and by resolution dated
November 8, 1972, the Detroit Board of Education adopted
the aforementioned shortened semester system. See Exhibit
A attached hereto.
The above action of the Board on your affiant's
recommendation was necessary because of the lack of finances
and the fact that it is impossible to conduct 180 regular
school days in the School District for the City of Detroit
because of the unavailability of funds.
Subscribed and sworn to
before me this J / "-day of November, 1972.
■ - -r-> ..
Notary Public, Wayne County, Michigan
My Commission expires :____'' ' -
3-
exhibit a
Motion Adopted at Special Meeting of
----------Board of Education
November 8, 1972
In the event that we do not get court relief the
academic calendar for the current school year shall be revised
hat the present first semester shall end on December 21st
and that the second semester for the current academic year shall
begin on February 19th and end June 15, 1973.