Dallas County District Judge Entz's Interrogatories to Legislative Black Caucus; First Request for Production of Documents
Public Court Documents
April 3, 1989
13 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Dallas County District Judge Entz's Interrogatories to Legislative Black Caucus; First Request for Production of Documents, 1989. 5bec161f-207c-f011-b4cc-7c1e52467ee8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d797b800-586e-46b6-8684-515a51b5605b/dallas-county-district-judge-entzs-interrogatories-to-legislative-black-caucus-first-request-for-production-of-documents. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
HUGHES & LUCE
2800 MOMENTUM PLACE
1717 MAIN STREET
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 1500 UNITED BANK TOWER
(214) 939-5500 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
TELECOPIER (214) 239-6100 (512) 482-6800
TELEX 730836 TELECOPIER (512) 474-4258
Direct Dial Number
(214) 939-5577
April 3, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL RRR
P-083-321-175
Ms. Gabrielle K. McDonald
301 Congress Avenue
Suite” 2050
Austin, Texas 78701
Re: LULAC Council No. 4434, et al. v. Jim Mattox, et al.
Dear Ms. McDonald:
Enclosed please find Dallas County District Judge F.
Harold Entz's Interrogatories to Legislative Black Caucus and
Dallas County District Judge F. Harold Entz's First Request
for Production of Documents to Legislative Black Caucus.
By copy of this letter, all counsel of record are being
provided with copies of these documents.
Very truly yours,
DY.
David C. Godbey
DCG/phl
Enclosure
cc: Rolondo Rios
Susan Finkelstein
William L. Garrett
Edward B. Cloutman, III
E. Brice Cunningham
Renea Hicks
Ken Oden
David R. Richards
J. Eugene Clements
Darrell Smith
Michael J. Wood
52800010:34
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC COUNCIL NO. 4434, etal.
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
Vv.
MO-88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, et al. etal.
Va
lv
a
1v
al
v/
al
v
a
l
v
/
a
l
v
/
a
l
v
al
vs
)
Defendants.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE
F. HAROLD ENTZ'S INTERROGATORIES TO
LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS
TO: Plaintiffs Legislative Black Caucus, by and through their
attorney of record, Gabrielle K. McDonald, 301 Congress
Avenue, Suite 2050, Austin, Texas 78701:
Judge F. Harold Entz submits his first interrogatories to
Plaintiffs Legislative Black Caucus ("Respondents") in
accordance with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure as follows:
DEFINITIONS
1. "Document" means the original and any non-identical
copy of any document (including writings, drawings, graphs,
charts, photographs, phonorecords, audio recordings, and other
data compilations from which information can be obtained,
translated, if necessary, by the Respondents through detection
devices into reasonably usable form) and any tangible things
which constitute or contain matters within the scope of Rule
26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 1
2. "Communication" means any oral or written
communication between or among any identified parties,
including but not limited to telephone calls, meetings,
discussions, correspondence, memoranda, or other messages
conveyed from one party to another regardless of medium.
3. videntify,"” or any form of that word wused in
connection with a document, means to state: (a) the name, date
and subject of the document; (b) the type of document (e.g.,
letter, memorandum, note, report); (c) the identity of the
author and all recipients of the document; (d) the identity of
the custodian or possessor of the document or a copy of the
document; and (e) the location of the document or a copy of
the document.
q. “1dentify," or any form of that word used in
connection with a person, if that person is an individual,
means to state (a) the name; (b) the present employer, if
known; and (c) the present or last known business and home
addresses and telephone numbers.
5 "identify," or any form of that word used in
connection with a person, if the person is a corporation,
partnership, or other legal entity, means to (a) state the
name; (b) identify the state of legal formation; (c) identify
all officers, directors, partners and/or principals; and (d)
state the person's principal place of business.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 2
6. vrIdentify," ior any form of that word used in
connection with a communication, means to identify the parties
to the communication, identify the medium of the communication
(e.g., phone conversation, letter, etc.), and state the date
of the communication.
7. "You" or "Your" means Plaintiff Legislative Black
Caucus.
8. "Relating to" a subject means containing, embodying,
referring to, comprising, reflecting. explaining, or having
any significant logical, factual or causal connection with the
subject.
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Answer each interrogatory fully in writing under
oath, unless the interrogatory is subject to objection, in
which case the reasons for objection must be stated in lieu of
answer. If precise information is not available for answer,
an estimate identified as such may be provided.
2. The interrogatories are continuing in nature and your
responses should be supplemented as required by Rule 33 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. All answers and other responses to the
interrogatories must be served upon the undersigned counsel
within fifteen £15) days after service of these
interrogatories upon Respondents.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 3
INTERROGATORIES
i. Identify each person you expect to call as an expert
witness at trial and state the subject matter on which the
expert is expected to testify. Include within your answer the
substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is
expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each such
opinion.
2 If you claim that Blacks and Hispanics are politically
cohesive in Dallas County, please state the factual bases for
such a claim
3. If you claim that voting in Dallas County is racially
polarized, please state the factual bases for such a claim.
4. Identify every Dallas County election you have analyzed,
describing fully your method of analysis, and the results of
such analysis.
5. Identify every candidate for public office in Dallas
County whom you have sponsored or preferred in the last twenty
years. Include within your answer the date of the race, the
position the race was intended to fill, the identity of the
winner of the race, and the percentage of Blacks, Whites, and
Hispanics respectively voting for your sponsored or preferred
candidate.
6. Identify every factor and circumstance present in Dallas
County with respect to the political processes leading to the
nomination or election of candidates to public office in
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 4
Dallas County that you® claim is .not equally open (0
participation by Blacks and that you claim gives Blacks less
opportunity than other members of the electorate to
participate in the political process and to elect
representatives of their choice.
7. If you claim that any part of the established system in
Dallas County for electing state district: judges dilutes Black
voting strength, state the factual bases for your claim, if
any, that the reasons for adopting such a system are tenuous.
8. If you claim that the system of electing state district
judges in Dallas County is intentionally designed to
discriminate against minorities, please state the factual
bases for such a claim.
9. If you claim that Blacks in Dallas County have been denied
access to a candidate slating process, please state the
factual bases for such a claim.
10. If you claim that Blacks in Dallas County are hindered in
their ability to participate effectively in the political
process, state your factual bases for such a claim.
11. If you claim that political campaigns in Dallas County
have been characterized by overt or subtle racial appeals,
state your factual bases for such a claim.
12. 1f you claim that there is a significant lack: of
responsiveness on the part of the elected judges in Dallas
County to the particularized needs of Blacks, state your
factual bases for such a claim.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 5
13. Describe the location and population of each and every
single member district you claim could and/or should be drawn
in Dallas County with respect to electing state district
judges.
14. With respect to your answer to Interrogatory No. 14,
state the percentage of Anglo, Black, and Hispanic members of
the voting age population in each such district.
15. For each person identified in response to Interrogatory
No. 1, please list every engagement of the expert in which the
expert was hired potentially to testify and in which Section 2
of the Voting Rights Act was involved. Include within your
answer the person or group by whom the expert was retained.
16. If you claim that Blacks in Dallas County are politically
cohesive, state the factual bases for such a claim.
17. If you claim that white voters in Dallas County vote as a
bloc usually to defeat your preferred candidates, state the
factual bases for such a claim.
18. Identify all documents relating to your answers to
Interrogatories 1-17.
19. Identify by name, address, and telephone number each
person assisting in the preparation of the answers to
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 6
Interrogatories 1-18 above.
Respectfully submitted,
CE
R rt’ +. Mow, Jr.
David C. Godbey
Bobby M. Rubarts
Esther R. Rosenblum
of HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
214/939-5500
ATTORNEYS FOR DALLAS
COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE
F. HAROLD ENTZ
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the
foregoin ocument was served on counsel of record on
this > day of April, 1989.
52800010:34
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
INTERROGATORIES TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC COUNCIL NO. 4434, etal. §
§
Plaintiffs, §
§ CIVIL ACTION NO.
v, §
§ MO-88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, etal. §
§
Defendants. §
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE
F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
TO LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS
TO: Plaintiff Legislative Black Caucus, by and through their
attorney of record, Gabrielle K. McDonald, 301 Congress
Avenue, Suite 2050, Austin, Texas 78701:
Pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Judge Entz submits the following request for
production of documents to Plaintiff Legislative Black Caucus
("Respondents"):
DEFINITIONS
1. "Document" means the original and any non-identical
copy of any document (including writings, drawings, graphs,
charts, photographs, phonorecords, audio recordings, and other
data compilations from which information can be obtained,
translated, if necessary, by the Respondents through detection
devices into reasonably usable form) and any tangible things
which constitute or contain matters within the scope of Rule
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO
LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 1
26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2s "you," Or "Your" means the Plaintiffs Legislative
Black Caucus.
3. "Relating to" a subject means containing, embodying,
referring to, comprising, reflecting. explaining, or having
any significant logical, factual or causal connection with the
subject.
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Respondents shall produce for inspection and copying
all documents described below within its possession custody
and control at the offices of Hughes & Luce, 2800 Momentum
Place, 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201, or such other
place as may be mutually agreed, within fifteen (15) days of
service of this request upon Respondents.
2 Respondents shall serve a written response to this
request upon the undersigned counsel within fifteen (15) days
of service of this request upon Respondents.
3. For all documents withheld from production based upon
a claim of privilege or work product immunity, Respondents
shall state a brief description of the nature of the document,
the person or persons creating the document, all recipients of
the document, all persons who have seen or been permitted
access to the document, a brief summary of the contents of the
document, and the factual basis for the privilege or immunity
claimed.
q. If any document was, but is ‘no longer, within
Respondents's possession, custody, or control, state the
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO
LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 2
disposition made of such document, including that date, method
of, and reason for such disposition and identify, if known,
any person now having possession, custody, or control of the
document or a copy of the document.
DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED
Respondents shall produce all documents relating to:
1. All documents required to be identified by you in response
to Judge Entz's written interrogatories
2. Anything reviewed by any of your experts.
3. The elections in Dallas County which you contend
demonstrate racially polarized voting in Dallas County.
4. Your claims, if any, that Blacks and Hispanics in Dallas
County are politically cohesive.
5. Your claims, if any, that Blacks are politically cohesive
in Dallas County.
6. The geographic location and racial make-up of the single
member districts that you claim could be drawn in Dallas
County with respect to the election of state district judges.
7. Any statistical studies upon which you rely in support of
any of your claims.
8. Any statistical analysis or other analysis of elections in
Dallas County performed by you or on your behalf in connection
with this lawsuit.
9. Anything prepared by any of your experts.
10. The curriculum vitae of each of your experts.
11. Anything submitted by you to any of your experts.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO
LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 3
12. Any publications of any of your experts.
13. Any transcripts of the depositions or other testimony of
any of your experts in any other case involving the Voting
Rights Act or any type of redistricting.
14. Any of your claims in the lawsuit.
15. The number and percentage of registered Black, Hispanic,
and other voters in Dallas County.
16. The percentage of Black attorneys among all attorneys
eligible to run for election as a state district judge in
Dallas County.
17. The geographic location of areas in Dallas County in
which you claim that there is a sufficiently compact Black
population for the drawing of single member districts in
Dallas County in which Blacks would constitute the majority of
voters.
18. The documents produced to you by any of the defendants in
this lawsuit.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert H.) Mow, Jr.
David C. Godbey
Bobby M. Rubarts
Esther R. Rosenblum
of HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
214/939-5500
ATTORNEYS FOR DALLAS
COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE
~~ F. HAROLD ENTZ
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO
LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the
foregoin document was served on counsel of record on
this day of April, 1989.
dd ”
52800010:21
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ'S
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO
LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS - Page 5