Order to Show Cause
Public Court Documents
June 16, 1970

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time, 1995. 644f1f0f-a246-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d1bee957-2cd1-4ab2-934e-7989290609d6/motion-for-extension-of-time. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
S.C. 115255 MILO SHEFF, ET Al. 3 SUPREME COURT VS. WILLIAM A. O’NEILL, ET AL. : JULY 25, 1995 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The plaintiffs move for a 5-day extension of time in which the parties will file their briefs. 1. Brief History This case involves the constitutional right of students in the Hartford area to equal educational opportunity. 2, Specific Facts The Supreme Court issued an order sua sponte on May 11, 1995 that the trial court file a finding of facts by June 15, 1995, the plaintiffs file their brief by July 27, 1995, the defendants file their brief by August 24, 1995, and the plaintiffs file their reply brief by September 7, 1995. Thereafter the time for the to file its finding was extended 12 days until June 27, 1995. The record in this case is voluminous and the issues are of great importance. The plaintiffs have been working diligently on their brief but need 5 more days to put it in final form for filing. OPPOSING COUNSEL CONSENTS TO THE GRANTING OF THIS MOTION Therefore, the plaintiffs’ brief should be due on August 1, 1995, the defendants’ brief should be due on August 29, 1995, and the plaintiffs’ reply brief should be due on September 12, 1995. 3. Legal Grounds This Court may grant an extension of time for good cause shown. P.B. §4040. The reasons in this motion constitute good cause. PLAINTIFFS By We LA I~ Wesley (W. Horton MOLLER, HORTON & SHIELDS, P.C. 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT. 086105 Juris No. 38478 (203) 522-8338 ORDER For good cause shown the foregoing is hereby GRANTED/DENIED. By the Court, CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the plaintiffs and the following counsel of record on July 25, 1995: John C,. Brittain, Esq. UCONN LAW SCHOOL 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 (203) 241-4664 Martha Stone, Esq. Philip D. Tegeler, Esq. CCLU 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 (203) 247-9823 Christopher Hansen, Esq. ACLU 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 (212) 944-9800 Marianne Engelman Lado, Esq. Dennis D. Parker, Esq. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson Street New York, NY ' 10013 (212) 219-1900 Sandra Del Valle, Esq. PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 (212) 219-3360 Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT 06102 (203) 297-0760 Bernard McGovern, Esq. Martha Watts Prestley, Esq. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 (203) 566-7173 Gregory D'Auria, Esq. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106 (203) 566-4990 WG LL Wesley W. "Horton S.C. .15255 MILO SHEFF, ET AL. : SUPREME COURT VS. WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, ET AL. : JULY 25.,. 1995 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The plaintiffs move for a 5-day extension of time in which the parties will file their briefs. X. Brief History This case involves the constitutional right of students in the Hartford area to equal educational opportunity. 2. Specific Facts The Supreme Court issued an order sua sponte on May 11, 1995 that the trial court file a finding of facts by June 15, 1995, the plaintiffs file their brief by July 27, 1995, the defendants file their brief by August 24, 1995, and the plaintiffs file their reply brief by September 7, 1995. Thereafter the time for the trial court to file its finding was extended 12 days until June 27, 1995. The record in this case is voluminous and the issues are of great importance. The plaintiffs have been working diligently on their brief but need 5 more days to put it in final form for filing. OPPOSING COUNSEL CONSENTS TO THE GRANTING OF THIS MOTION Therefore, the plaintiffs’ brief should be due on August 1, 1995, the defendants’ brief should be due on August 29, 1995, and the plaintiffs’ reply brief should be due on September 12, 1995. 3. Legal Grounds This Court may grant an extension of time for good cause shown. P.B. §4040. The reasons in this motion constitute good cause. PLAINTIFFS By nL / A . Wesley (W. Horton MOLLER, HORTON & SHIELDS, P.C. 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT 06105 Juris No. 38478 (203) 522-8338 ORDER For good cause shown the foregoing is hereby GRANTED/DENIED. By the Court, CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the plaintiffs and the following counsel of record on July 25, 1995: John C. Brittain, Esq. UCONN LAW SCHOOL 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 (203) 241-4664 Martha Stone, Esq. Philip D. Tegeler, Esq. CCLU 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 (203) 247-9823 Christopher Hansen, Esq. ACLU 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 (212) 944-9800 Marianne Engelman Lado, Esq. Dennis D. Parker, Esq. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 (212) 219-1900 Sandra Del Valle, Esq. PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 (212) 219-3360 Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT. 06102 (203) 297-0760 Bernard McGovern, Esq. Martha Watts Prestley, Esq. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 110 Sherman Street Bartford, CT 06105 (203) 568-7173 Gregory D’Auria, Esq. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106 (203) 566-4990 Wt, AAAAT Wesley W. "Horton