Memorandum from Guinier to Kellogg Re Amending Complaint in Major v. Treen
Correspondence
October 28, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Memorandum from Guinier to Kellogg Re Amending Complaint in Major v. Treen, 1982. 1aa76479-c903-ef11-a1fd-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d957d0aa-5fec-45c8-850e-fad9b4d3f6f2/memorandum-from-guinier-to-kellogg-re-amending-complaint-in-major-v-treen. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
|
MEMORANDUM
October 28, 1982
Jim Kellogg
Lani Guinier
Amending Complaint in Major v. Treen
Preliminary Statement
Discuss what has happened since March re: modifications
of State House plan following the filing of this action and
objections by the Department of Justice pursuant to Section 5.
State that: the apportionment of United States House
continues to have the purpose, result and effect of diluting
minority voting strength and of denying black citizens the
ability to use their vote effectively despite the failure of
the Department of Justice to object under Section 5.
Include sentence that: allegations are in addition to
the allegations contained in the Complaint and bring the pre-
vious allegations into conformity with the June 1982 amendment
to. §2.0f the Voting Rights Act, 42:U.8.C, §1973,
Jurisdiction
add: The Court has jurisdiction over the claims in
the Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§: 1331 .and 1343 and 424U.S.C.- 81973j.f *Plain-
tiffs' claims arise from the statutes and con-
stitution of the United States and are claims
to enforce statutes and constitutional pro-
visions which protect civil rights including
the right to vote.
Parties
Do we want to add more parties from the affected Congres-
sional districts?
V..&: NT. Facts and Causes of Action
Amend paragraph 19 to state that Justice has approved
the plan despite its discriminatory purpose, result and effect.
Amend the complaint at Paragraphs 21 and 26 to allege
addition to all current allegations that the November 1981
®
plan of apportionment for Louisiana Representatives to the
United States Congress has the purpose and result of abridging
the right: to vote of black: citizens, of diluting minority
voting strength and of denying members of the black community
the opportunity to elect representatives: of their choice in
violation of Section 2, of the Voting Rights Act, as amended.
Do we want to consider an additional claim for relief
re: defendants' affirmative obligation to eliminate the effects
of past discrimination and to assure that black citizens have
a fair opportunity to elect representatives of their choice to
the United States Congress? This claim would be brought pur-
suant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment,
the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and
the Fifteenth Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §1981 and §2 of the Voting
Rights Act as amended.
VIII. Prayer for Relief
Add... as follows:
1. Grant the relief prayed for in the Complaint;
2. Declare that the apportionment of the Louisiana
Legislature Act 20 of the First Extraordinary
Session of 1981 has the purpose, result and
effect of abridging the right of black citizens
to vote, of diluting minority voting strength,
and of denying black citizens the opportunity
to elect representatives of their choice in
violation of §2 of the Voting Rights Act of
1965 as amended, 42 U.S.C. 81973, in violation
of the Thirteenth (?), Fourteenth, Fifteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution and
in‘violation of 42: U.S.C. $1981 and enjoin defen-
dants from participating in, supervising, con-
ducting or certifying the results of any election
pursuant to this apportionment in the future
which has the purpose, result or effect of
diluting the voting strength of black citizens.
(If ‘we include additional affirmative claim for
relief). Declare that defendants have an affirma-
tive duty to eliminate the effects of past pur-
poseful discrimination and to assure that plain-
tiffs and other black citizens of Louisana have
a fair opportunity to elect representatives of
their choice to the:Unlited States Congress;
# »
further declare that Act 20 does not afford
plaintiffs and other black voters a fair
opportunity to elect representatives of their
choice in violation of §2 of the Voting Rights
Act of 1965 as amended, the Thirteenth,
Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments ... and
enjoin defendants from participating in,
certifying ... any apportionment in the future
which does not eliminate the effects of past
purposeful discrimination.
Award the costs of this action, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, to plaintiffs; and
Grant such other and further relief as may be
just and appropriate.