Bozeman v. State Appeal from Pickens Circuit Court
Public Court Documents
March 31, 1981

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman & Wilder Working Files. Bozeman v. State Appeal from Pickens Circuit Court, 1981. 1a6f5eff-ee92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/da4b1aab-6e67-44c8-8d7e-9e12d23c647c/bozeman-v-state-appeal-from-pickens-circuit-court. Accessed April 07, 2025.
'-. i' ' , .,. ll .,4 .t l. llA'R 31'l"n{il f T}IE STATE OF ALABAMA --- JUDICIAL DEPARTMEI{T THE AI"ABA},IA COURT OF CRIMINAL. APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 19BO-81 2 Div. 27 6 Maggie S. Bozeman v. State Appeal from Pickens Circuit Court DeCARLO, JUDGE " Ttre grand jury of Pickens County irtdicted t-he appellanE ancl chargecl trc:r in a three-counL inclicLment vrirh voEing more than once or deposi.ting, more than one absentee ballot for the o o s.rnle of f j-cc zts hcr voi-c, ot.' cas Linl; ilIr:gurl ol: fratrclulent a)' irbscntee bal..l.ots. Tiris :Ls a cornpanion case tc, {r!LL R-.__U!lg-e,: _yr_ S!_q}-r:, 2 J).iv. 26?. (I,Is. },Iar:ch 3}, 198l) . Thc indict.nent in t:iris case, orni.tting the formal parts, reads as follows: "I'trc Grand -Iur:y of sai.d CounLy charge, that, before the finding of this; indicrment, Maggie S. Ilozenran, r.Ihose nanle to the Grand Jtrry is othenvise unknown: "COUt'lT ONE "did vote nore than once, or did deposit more tlran one ball.ot for the same office as her vote, or did vote i1.1ega1ly or fraudulently, in the Democratic Primary Run*off Election of September 26, rg78, "COUi'iT TI^IO "did vote more than once as an absentee voter, or did deposit more than one absentee balloc for the same office or offices as her vote, or did cast illegal or fraudulent absentee bal1ots, in the Dernocratic Primary Run-of f Election of Septenrber 26, 1978, ''COUNT TTIREE "did cast illegal or fraudr-rlent absentee ballots in the DetnocraLic Primary Run-off Election of .September 26,1978,.in that she did deposit rvith the Pickens County Circuit Clerk, absentee ballots whicl'r rvere f::audulent .and which she knerv to be fr:rudulent, against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama." After a trvo-clay tri.al which encled on l.lovember 2, Lg7g, tl-rc appellant was fotrnci 6r,uilt.y as charged in the indictment and sc:ntr:ncecl to I.our yC;lrs irnprisollmeil t. She gave not j-ce of ap1>ea1 ancl filecl a rnotion for a nelr trial. The motion rvas subsequg$1y_- *--- clcrricd vrherr no tcsEirnony or arg,uinent tv;rs ntade on behalf of the r;ro t i.on . l'hcr evidence prcsent.ecl at tr:ia1 ruas sutrsLantially -2- 't NI:.;. Jmnice TiI Iey' s tes Li.rnony concel-n,i.ni1 absentee .rutfirll pr.'occrilltt--ct; r.i.rs s'.rbst:itnt-iaJ.Iy si.rnillrr t:o her testimor-ry i n Ili.-1r!g1, sjrrprl. i,ls; . Ti..1.1.e1, s [.;ri-c'cl t-liat. t]re rvr:c:k precr:cli.ng Llre Septcutbrl r 26 , I97B Dcritocr.';rt.ic 1'r irnary 'lirrn-of i. IlccLion slrcr gave thc ;:rppell:rnt- appr:oxiriraLel.y Lr.rerlt.y--fi-r,,c to thi-rty airsenLee voting al.rplicat:Lc,lrs;. I.Is. T.Lllcy test.ifi cd Ltrat the appt:11ernt cane Lo the l'ickerl.s CorinEy Cir-cui.L Cl.r:r:li'.s off.Lce re(lrles Eing the applications or) s everal occersi.ons . l{s . Tilley speci- <-.-.....- fically rerncmbr:rerl seeing thc appellani- on Septerlber 25th in thc conrpany of Julia l.lilde::- Ms. Ti.lley recalled seeing the appellant in a car outside ther clerl<'s office at- that Eime, buE she did "not reuember: vzheiher appellant helself retLlrned any ballots to the office. Ms. Tilley noticed.that a number of ballots rrlere mailed to the same address, 601 lfenth Avenue }Iorthwe.st, Alicev-i1le, Alabama. a--*---'' During cross-examinati on, i'is . Tilley tes tif j-ed that there is no requirernent that. applications for absentee voLi.ng be pickecl up by the voters theursel'res. Pickens County Sherj.ff Loui-e Colc:nl;rn's testiurony was substanLially the same as hi-s testimony in I,Jil.clr'-I, supra. Mr.. Char.l.es Iate tesLifj.ccl bas; j.cal.ly coneerning, h-i.s parEicip;rtion in invel;ti5iat.in5; t.hc vot:Lng, i-t.regularities in t-hr: SepEernber:, 1978 e.l-r:c1;.ion. Ln c:ount-ing Ltrcr bal.l.ots r';hich trad ber:n clotrbl,.l loc1.-ed ir-l Ltr: i>:r [.l.ot. l,to:,:, 1-trvcsri.j fiiit-c>r: 'I'at:c: obsr:i^vccl t-tr2t Lhi.::ty-nine <;f. the bal.IoLs h;rcl beerr rtotar.Lzed try I';rtrl C. i(oll j.ns . Al; parE of h j-s j.nves t L;5i,rt-i-on, Iir. 'I;tEe e>lantincd tl-rc: Iri.cltens Cotrnt y Circti:i.t. Cl.crk' s; r ecorcl:; t:o vt--l:i-fy whc:thcr e(.tJ.r:erjpoit,J.inl; ;tpi;1i<.:;,tt j otrs Iti;ri br:c:ir Jli.l r:d Lot' t-hcr .,tbsci.rtee bal.1.ot-r: , .,.rir.i r:lt lrr: f r-rttrrcl t.o bc Lhc (:ils(r . ')- )-- , IIr. Iraul L. ilollins, a notary public frorn . T ,.r:icaloosa, tcstif i-ecl thert hc trail ]<no,..rn Ltre a1>pellanL nine ()l: t.t:n year.s. l'ir.-. llol--[ins rvas shor.rn sc:vcral oI the thirty-ni.ne brr.l.l,ots he not;lrj.zecl on sepLernber: 23, lgTB in his; of fj-ce in 'l'us;c;rloosa. All of thes;e ballo ts lracl nol bcen signed j.n his prcsence:Ircl Lira.t he r'zas not l'rersonally acquainLed vrith those porsons v:ho lracl signecl. Mr. Itollj.ns sLatecl that appellzrnt, Jtrlia i,lilder and trvo ot.her 1aclic,.s br:oughr ttre ballots to iris office and r.rere present when he notarized them. He further testifj-ed that he had talked vrith the appellant about notarizing the ballots. cross-exanrination, Mr. Rollins stated that he aclvised the appellant, I'Is. Wilder ?.rd the other two ladiies that the persons signing the ballots were supposed to be in his presence. Mr. Rollins testified that pri.or to notarizing the ballots he receivcd t\.io telephone calIs pertaining to the l>al-Iots ancl that one bf the calls rvas from the appellant. P.o1lj.ns statecl thaL he rvas pai.cl fot nis services; ancl that subsequentl.y vrent to Picl<ens County to find those persons had a1legedIy signed the baIlots.. IIe had the appellant's urnistance on that occasion, hoiriver, he vlas sure he did go to Pickens County prior to September 26, Lg7B. Mr. he who not voLcr of i-O vote Rtrn'off t-o vc.rt.e. , -.\ CM'1' L)-i.c:1.-r,:rrs Cr:r-rnt-y arrcl s 1.;rt-ccl Ltrat she sig,ned arr appli-cation al-ri;c:nLc:e in ttre Sc1>tctttber 26, L97B De:tnocratic Primary Iil.e.ction'. She tesfifiecl th;rr she never recei.ved a ballot ,i,,,riu o n,., ,;;;) ry6'."u^r.t. ;__"-I) ,"u ------< -- (--- --- - -. ----- ----'._-------*--s ..*.---i^---'-- :; !crsLjrnen), r.I.rs sulrst-:.n'It.i;rl1.y tilc s,rlne as their( I'ir:. I:litt: Diincy' - /1- I Jirn.L e '.1 st,\ 5 . hc 1-p c:cl he r I'l.l cct-ion. ba-t .Lot. l'1rs Ii.i.chr:y [: (l v()Lcl erb..;en't-(:rr Shc lr;r,-l no obj ect t.esLi-fi-ed that- Jr-tli-er I,lilder in ttie Dcll:o<:'r:l: [:j r: Prirrrtrr:y llun-of .[ j.orr t-o Lhe r.ray I{s. \.li.lcler mar:kecl lter IIr.s. Itronn:Lc I]. lti.ce tes tif ic:cl thaL she voted absentee in Ltte Detnc-rcraLi.c Pri.rnary ltun- o f.f Elcct j oir , ancl LhaL her application and ba.Llot. cante iu L:he mai.1. She staEecl th;rE she rnarked hcr.' "X's" rvithouL assistance ancl t.hcn signecl hc:r name on the ballot. I'lrs;. Rice gave her bal1oL to Julia l.lj.lder. she did not knorv PauI C. Rollins. Ninety-three-year-old Lou Sommervj-lle testifie.d thaL she vras.a registerecl voter in Pickens Counry and that Jtr1ia trlilder assisted her in voting in the September 26, 1-978 Democratic Primary l{un*off Election. Mrs. Sommervill-e sEated that she placed her ballot in the' box at the pol-ls . I,Irs. Sommerville insistecl th:r.t Jtrlia I'Jilde:: ancl hcrrl daughter: were the only per:sons rvho hacl ever assisLeci hr:r in vo[ing, absentee, and she ,made her .or,rn rrXrr marl<. I{rs. Sorrincr:ville did nor }<.no',.r PauL C. P.ollins. Sophia Spann, tvhose absent-ee ballot r.ras notar.Lzed by Paul Rollins at the appcll.ant's; requerst, testifiect that she alr.iays votecl in Cochran, Alzttraura, ancl that shc trad never voted :i.n i\li.cevill.e. I'Is., Spann statcc'! thaL she hacl never voted an absenLcc blrllot-, btrt. f htrt- the :ippc1I..lrrl, it;:rl c:oiir,3 t.c h,:r 1',6,lsr:ic ancl hacl tal-kecl to hc:r: alrout it. She hacl l:rror.rn thc appell;rnt ;-rl.l. hcr 1j.fe. On t.irc ocr-:asi.on the app.ollartt talkr:d rvi.th l'ls. Siir;urn, i'is. Spann l-cs; t i.f i.r:d t-haL Lhe fcrl I o'.,ri.r.rg coil\'ct-sj;ttion ocr:ur:recl: "Sihr,r i ur; L- irs;l<r-:tJ Inc bcc:.tusc riiy lrtr:;l-rarrcl t.lits si cii. .A.:r rl _.';_hi.:_ :r.i:ir t.fL. mi_ !l l.(]-- .t _-lil-,_', !..._!te.l _!,Ll . v_g !l::_ ,Lor._-l q. Arrcl I r.tclir Ir.ln' t. her,,rc ]..etl t-o (:()iirc ovrir^ t-o Al icr:v-i-I.l-c . " L s;;ti.<1 , 'ri,r.lylrt:. .t cJort't. lt,:tvr: t.r-r go t,i.r AIj-c:c:viIli:. '[ vot r,'l; irl (ir-,i:itrirlr. ' -[ irirvr:tt' i. \/(]t,c'(l i r-r Al.i c,::vi'l.J-,: j rr r!l'/ .L i { ,:. .l voLe ;; hrrre'.. .Jul; t. s; i..rtt.'t-etl to vot:in1', t.i 5','r.yL -i.l'r Cor-'irr';1ir. '['ltat:'s :rl-J L vot-t,. " []irnl;tr,-r.s.Ls .l'lcii:<l- , ri_. -irr 4 , -* *5 , ,' :'t :. d t I'Is. Spr-rnn clcnicd cvc:r rn;rkini,, lpplicat.ion for ar1 abs;trnLcc l;;rl.loL, or: to hav.Lrrg evcr signod her: n;rme to one. Sir:r: I..Ti-Idcr', .sLrp]--a, ancl ttre atL;rclicd apperrclix. Oir crc,ss- cxanti.nat Lon , I'ls . Spzrnn Le.sEif ied that she kncrv Jrrli;r l.lilcler, trut "I don't knorv her nor.hi.ng l.ike l- do Pl;r11gie. " Sher clenjecl thart Julia l'I.i..[clcr: had ever becn to her , trorrse and furt.hcr clenied ever havJ.ng dj.scussed voting vrith her on .rny occasion. ancl sai<1, "I clon't knor.l anyLtring about that." Ms, Spann testified ttrat- the appellant talked to her before voting tirne. "She thoughL I had to come to Aliceville and she.rvas helping me- And I told her I didn't have to go : to Aliceville, I votcs in Cochran,'and. I clidn't need the heIp." I'{s. Spann ne>',t- testifiecl t}r.at rvhen she r.retrt to Cochran to vote, a voting official tolcl her she had already voted in Aliceville; "somebody hacl votecl for me over at the Ali.ceville. ." Fr:om the r:g.cord "Q. A rltresLion like that carne uP? "A. Yes , s ir. I^lhcrn I rva.Lkecl in, I'Irs . Charf ene saicl, there's my marna. Horv come you so late? So, she said, 'vrell, thaL ' s all right. Sgryglg-fly_<i-cr119-loLecl' for: yotr o-ver: at the-Ali"-"-yi1l.,' eUcl__g_hg_rhglved it co-r!e. And she aslied me did I lcnorv that vr::iring. I 'didn't knorv that writing. "Q. Novr, vrho tolci y.r,, that ? ',. "A. lhe tady cloi'rn .rt- Cochran, the lady, Ilrs. Cir r-rr:1. (:rI e , l'ir . Ilardy Bal clr'riri ' s r'ri f e "Q. Di.d s;he tel.l yotr hovr she colne to l<nol,'r ttrat you hacl votcrcl? "A. It r.ras; in the box at Cochran. The paper \'Ias in l-he box ancl he Isi c] got it. ancl sholcrd i t- to ' rrio and as;ked ine did I l'-I-to',v ih;rL: h;rndrvt:iting' I r-1i.cln' t l.-nor./ j-f.. 'I'haL's; zrl.L of. it. r' IErnp]rasis ac]ded- J )1r..; . I uc- j.l.l c Ilarris;' t-es; ti niony rvars subs tanti,ally t.he r;;ri;lri ;rsr lrer.' L r:s t.it;rony in !'lf.t_S]flf , suPra ' hL t lrcr ccrircltrsiion of I'irs;. il:rr:t. i-s' Lc:s;titnorty ttrc Statt: r-r::;t-i,ci .it.l; (:iti;(.: ltril ;tilirc11-:tnt-'s; trrot- iot-tl; t'cl c:<c:l'ttcr"'l r'/el:e cleni'ccl' ,.1 i:,.: (-lr-) [(jil:;(. c].i cl rrr.rl'-. i)rcrjr:r1 t- ;t C;ts;C. C1o;i-nq aL-fl,LltltcnLl; rv<:re hacl ;rir:,1 i-lrrr t-t:,i ir.l. c()trrl- I)r()[)r:rI/ ctr;rrlr,eci Lirr: jury .'lt; L.o [he l:t,..r, fhere - .sJ- +-.--:*-'; ri .rl t'. ; I bc,Lr-r Ir, no exct:p Li t orl S a , ,../-----------.\-- ,/-*-\ \ ( S ec t- io n .t.'l -21-- I \\_._ ) 1'l i I rr.c::, sLrlrr iI-' / ind.i.c t-irtetrt in the :lncl ict-ment iVi.Ldcr, supra. Lalccn. Cloclo ol .t. lil a}-r;.inrit .f 9 / 5, is; c()1t-<; L.i [:ut-.i-orr;r]- . 'I'ire par t- t.o rr;r I ir,l . II. this c;rr-ic), in lV.i I 11r:r , rvhicli sLlpr:il l_s -t- J ic.lcnl- Lc:a I .i-n prcr t-i nent- ct)ns t.i tu [:.i.onar l -1.y II1. 'Ihe elvidence, although circumst.rnL j-aI to a -Large <legree and confusing in several itrstances;, r.ras suf f icient to suplrort---- ttre juryrs ver:dict.. In reviewing the suf f ici.ency of circumstantial <:_-. -_.. ev-id.ence Lhe ;;;;;;" appliecr is ,,,rvherher rhe jury rnighr reasonably fincl thal. bhe evidence excltrclecl every reasonable hypobhesis except thaL of guilt; not r.rhether such eviclence excl.ucles every reasonable hypol-hesis but guilt, but rvhether a jury mi-ghl: reasonably so conclucle. (Ci tati.ons onitted) . ' " Pplyl.n_v._ g!g!_e_, 391 So.2d 133, L37 (AI.a, 1980); !lr1$tq_ y-.._:2!g!9, 368 .So.2c1 871, 874 (nl.a.Cr.App. I97B), cert. clcnjecl, 3C',tl So.2ct 877 (At:r. I!179). On review, this court is requ-irec1 to coniiicler the eviclence in the light most- favorabl.e Lo the pr:osecutj.on. Uac_gfq_!_Sta{-e, 3'l3So.2d 1242 (hla.Cr.APp. 1.979); C_oLcinan v. Stat-c_, 37 i\Ia.App, -.-__-- 4O5, 69 So.2d 48-L (1954) . Thj.s court lnus;t i..rke thc evidence favorable to the f)rosecl,rt.i-orr as L.tttic, arrcl acc:orc-l Lo the State atI j.eEi.tintrte j.nfcrer-:cr:':s {-trct--ci.roni. :lq.{ilU{:-l---.Y_:-. SLl_rc_, 378 5,,t-2c1, I.l f--,.i (,rrta.(lr.I'pp. ) r c:ert-. c1i,:ttic:rl, 37ii So.2c1 I:1.73 (nlir. 1979). Cj.r:<:utrs;tant,i-arl evj.dr'-:nr::e tur,rst- trr: ;lr:<:c-r:'clccl tI:c,r s;a(r'{l wc.i-glri: as cli.rect- evj.dence r.rhen iL i:o.Ltrts t,o tlrc trcc;ut;cil ils L.hc qr.rilty part!/. LXJ-.9 .l{:_-:S_!-:li._9, 33t} So. 2d 4Sit (A1.,-'r .Cr -Apir. I976) L'hc t-ru t.il f trlnt:s;s; o.L t-lrc tcl; i. i.tnc;lry rvit s; f t,t' t-itc: tr.i.cr:s of f atct. . i,i;t1' y..--ii!,il-!.g , 3'li\ S)ct.2rl ?.tt') (nItr.Cr:.A1t;r. 1.976) - '['het:,-: l]rl i:(:, ',r(.) (:ou(:l ucit:, etf t.c.,r ;rccot:ri.i ttg l-lr,: vcrcl j.ct a l..l rc:;l:;artrirl-r.Lr: [,i.(::!;r.u.:ri)l-:i c>ll c.tf (:(')j-L(-'(.tt-lt{::.;!; , l-lt.rt- t.iit: <:v.i.ctctr<.'r.-'\,'i}s; ::'1"..i r;icrrrt- [,o:;Lrr)i',,-)r.'l l.itr: t'cr:rii-c1.. i']c iti:(r r.-:(')rIVitr.:c<l Lhit. l-.1r..) ,i,. ,i;-r.:L- \./.r'i Irarl. ',','i.orr'-J ()l. ttt-l'i lr:';t. Ll.fl.l i'ictli rlrlL. 1.r.rl-r:ttt-lv ;-riit.i.:rs;L t-ir.-: ,,.,,:-i.rrirt: ,.)l' i.li,': (:.,, jc.l ,.'tirc(.:. j,t.i.<1,'tcg \7. S,i t-.rt-t: ,2t"4 :il.t. ti!.2, -7 - .,:i s;;: l{ :).ti' :torl .l ' 2"2.? So . Zcl 82f (1969) IV. flrer.e: is no lr'tcriL to ;rppcllan['s fj.nal argumeni: t.J.r:rL hcr coiliit:ir:ut:Lcnii--;Gi,t;--i./c're -tTil;l-ecl rvhen the Srate rrsc:(l its pereirptory s.tril<es.; to excl.ucle al.l. blacks from the (_- We llave searched the record for error prejudicial to appellant and have found none, therefore, the judgment of conviction by the Pickens Circui-E Court is affirmecl. AF}'IRMED. A1.1. the Judges concur. j ur:y venire. Thi.l; qucri ti.on rvar; de:lli.niLivc1y 6ri:rs\,,,,clre d in \_"- " *--^-"'-- -s-gaIr-fi.-Al-q!r-.,'D lac u. s. zoz, 13 L. Ed. ?-ct I5g, 85 s. ct. * - __/-=_*-._..:, : j i_t ._::. ---- -'- 82ti (1965); fUfipeg_y.__q!.r1")49 Ala. App. 233, 27o So. 2d, 666; \.:r]l::-*,<'\ Qarpentsr: _L._q.tg.!g\ AIa. Cr. App. I"ls. 6 Div. L54 (June, 1980) __)