Stipulation and Order Regarding Procedure for Taking of Expert Depositions; Correspondence from Whelan to Tegeler
Correspondence
May 20, 1992 - June 2, 1992

7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Stipulation and Order Regarding Procedure for Taking of Expert Depositions; Correspondence from Whelan to Tegeler, 1992. f0ac34b9-a346-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/dd2edc43-35a0-4710-aac2-cd24f0708813/stipulation-and-order-regarding-procedure-for-taking-of-expert-depositions-correspondence-from-whelan-to-tegeler. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
Cv89-0360977S MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiffs JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD Ve. WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. Defendants JUNE 4, 19892 ee oe oo ee se eo 00 00 ee eo 00 00 STIPULATION REGARDING PROCEDURE FOR TAKING OF EXPERT DEPOSITIONS As represented to this Court at a status conference held on May | 19, 1992, the parties stipulate and agree that the attached Order | Governing Depositions of Expert Witnesses may be entered by the Court, pursuant to Practice Book §220(c). Respectfully Submitted, YA al John Whelan Philip D. Tegeler Assistant Attorney General Martha Stone MacKenzie Hall Connecticut Civil Liberties 110 Sherman Street Union Foundation Hartford, CT 06105 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 Attorney for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been mailed postage prepaid by certified mail to: Philip D. Tegeler Helen Hershkoff | Martha Stone John A. Powell Connecticut Civil Liberties Adam S. Cohen | Union Foundation American Civil Liberties 32 Grand Street Union Foundation | Hartford, CT 06106 132 West 43rd Street | New York, NY 10036 | Wesley W. Horton Wilfred Rodriguez Moller, Horton, & Rice Hispanic Advocacy Project 90 Gillett Street Neighborhood Legal Services Hartford, CT 06105 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT 06112 Julius L. Chambers John Brittain Marianne Engelman Lado University of Connecticut Ronald L. Ellis School of Law NAACP Legal Defense & 65 Elizabeth Street Educational Fund, Inc. Hartford, CT 06105 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 Ruben Franco Jenny Rivera Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 this day of June, 1992. John Whelan Cv89-0360977S MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiffs Vv. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD Defendants e e LL ] o e \ J “b h L L ORDER GOVERNING DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES In accordance with the Stipulation of the parties dated June 4, 1992, the Court now enters the following orders SATsHavs to Practice Book §220(C), in order to insure the expeditious conduct of the depositions of expert witnesses. 1. No formal process beyond the issuance of a notice of deposition shall be necessary in order to oblige the party identifying an expert witness to produce that expert witness for deposition. If either party feels that it is necessary to issue a subpoena duces tecum in conjunction with a notice of deposition, counsel for the party identifying the expert will accept service of that subpoena on behalf of the expert witness. 2. With regard to expert witnesses who reside in states other than Connecticut, the party who intends to call that witness at trial will determine whether the deposition will be taken in Connecticut or in the witness's home state. Any costs incurred by the witness for travel, lodging, meals or other similar expenses incident to the appearance at the deposition shall be the exclusive responsibility of the party who intends to call that witness at trial. 3. The party taking the deposition of an expert under this Order shall pay the expert at the hourly rates agreed to by the parties for all time spent in the deposition and for a reasonable amount of preparation time, not to exceed 3 hours of preparation. 4. If additional experts are identified in the future, the parties shall confer and arrive at comparable rates of payment for each such expert. Any dispute resolving deposition rates for future experts shall be resolved by the Court. 5. Reimbursement for the fees associated with the attendance of expert witnesses at depositions shall be paid within sixty days of submission of an invoice for each expert. 6. The party listing any person as an expert witness shall reimburse the party taking such deposition for any such payments if the expert deposed is subsequently not called as a witness at trial. The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. shall be the guarantor with respect to any amounts plaintiffs may owe to defendants under this paragraph, and the State Department of Education shall be the guarantor with respect to any amounts defendants may owe under this paragraph. Such obligations under this paragraph shall not exceed $2,500 per deposition. 7. The defendants may not seek reimbursement from the plaintiffs for the time spent in preparation for or at a deposition by any individual who is a regular employee of the State Department of Education or the State Department of Housing at the time of their deposition regardless of whether the defendants have designated that person as an expert witness or not. SO ORDERED: Honorable Harry Hammer Superior Court Dated this day of June, 1992. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL MacKenzie Hall 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 FAX (203) 523-5536 Office of The Attornev General : Tel: 566-7173 State of Connecticut June 2, 1992 Philip Tegeler, Esq. Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 RE: Sheff v. O'Neill, Docket No. CV 89-0360977S Dear Phil: Pursuant to our recent conversations I am writing this letter to confirm our agreement regarding the hourly rates for the depositions of those individuals whose identity has been disclosed to date. This letter is being written pursuant to paragraph 3 of the order governing the depositions of expert witnesses which we have been discussing. Plaintiffs' Experts a. Dr. Jomills Henry Braddock, II -- $150 per hour; b. Dr. Christopher Collier -- $110 per hour: C. Dr. Robert L. Crain -- $150 per hour; d. Dr. Marvin F. Dawkins =-- $130 per hour e. Dr. Mary Kennedy -- $150 per hour; f. Dr. William Trent =-- $130 per hour; g. Dr. Charles V. Willie -- $150 per hour; h. Dr. Catherine E. Walsh -- $130 per hour; i. Yale Rabin =-- $130 per hour; Jj. Ruth Price -- $110 per hour; ke. John Allison -- $110 per hour; l. Hernan LaFontaine =-- $110 per hour. Defendants' Experts a. Christine Rossell, Ph.D. =-- $150 per hour; b. David Armor, Ph.D. =-- $150 per hour; Cc. G. Donald Ferree -- $90 per hour; d. Pasquale Forgione, Ph.D. -- $150 per hour; e. Lloyd Calvert -- $110 per hour; f. Thomas E. Steahr, Ph.D. -- $110 per hour; In addition I am writing to confirm that the following individuals are regular state employees who fall within the exception found in paragraph 7 of the order regarding the Philip Tegeler, Esq. May 20, 1992 Page 2 depositions of expert witnesses: Douglas Rindone, William Congero, Peter Behuniak, Elliot Williams, Robert Brewer, Peter Prowda, Theodore Sergi, Thomas Breen and Patricia Downs. If the defendants call these individuals as witnesses they will be called because of work they have done in the normal course of their employment and their testimony will be offered in the normal course of their employment. Since the defendants will incur no additional expense by reason of their testimony no fees for their time will be requested. Two of the individuals we have employed as expert witnesses are also state employees but they have been specially retained by this office for the purpose of this case. These individuals are Thomas Steahr and G. Donald Ferree. Pursuant to the agreement which we have reached it is understood that these two individuals do not fall within the provisions of paragraph 7 and that the rates set forth above will be paid by the plaintiffs. Please acknowledge the terms of the agreement which we have reached and which are set out above by signing the acknowledgment found below on behalf of the plaintiffs. Thank you for your cooperation. Very. truly yours, RICHARD/B EN L ATTOE N BY: i 4 Ke Asgigtant Attorney General JRW/mu / ACKNOWLEDGMENT: V/A Philip Tegeler, Esq. Counsel for the Plaintiffs