Stipulation and Order Regarding Procedure for Taking of Expert Depositions; Correspondence from Whelan to Tegeler
Correspondence
May 20, 1992 - June 2, 1992
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Stipulation and Order Regarding Procedure for Taking of Expert Depositions; Correspondence from Whelan to Tegeler, 1992. f0ac34b9-a346-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/dd2edc43-35a0-4710-aac2-cd24f0708813/stipulation-and-order-regarding-procedure-for-taking-of-expert-depositions-correspondence-from-whelan-to-tegeler. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
Cv89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
AT HARTFORD
Ve.
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al.
Defendants JUNE 4, 19892
ee
oe
oo
ee
se
eo
00
00
ee
eo
00
00
STIPULATION REGARDING PROCEDURE FOR TAKING OF EXPERT DEPOSITIONS
As represented to this Court at a status conference held on May |
19, 1992, the parties stipulate and agree that the attached Order |
Governing Depositions of Expert Witnesses may be entered by the Court,
pursuant to Practice Book §220(c).
Respectfully Submitted,
YA al
John Whelan Philip D. Tegeler
Assistant Attorney General Martha Stone
MacKenzie Hall Connecticut Civil Liberties
110 Sherman Street Union Foundation
Hartford, CT 06105 32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Attorney for Defendants
Attorney for Plaintiffs
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that one copy of the foregoing has been mailed
postage prepaid by certified mail to:
Philip D. Tegeler Helen Hershkoff |
Martha Stone John A. Powell
Connecticut Civil Liberties Adam S. Cohen |
Union Foundation American Civil Liberties
32 Grand Street Union Foundation |
Hartford, CT 06106 132 West 43rd Street |
New York, NY 10036 |
Wesley W. Horton Wilfred Rodriguez
Moller, Horton, & Rice Hispanic Advocacy Project
90 Gillett Street Neighborhood Legal Services
Hartford, CT 06105 1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
Julius L. Chambers John Brittain
Marianne Engelman Lado University of Connecticut
Ronald L. Ellis School of Law
NAACP Legal Defense & 65 Elizabeth Street
Educational Fund, Inc. Hartford, CT 06105
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
Ruben Franco
Jenny Rivera
Puerto Rican Legal Defense
and Education Fund
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
this day of June, 1992.
John Whelan
Cv89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs
Vv. JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD
Defendants
e
e
LL
]
o
e
\
J
“b
h
L
L
ORDER GOVERNING DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERT WITNESSES
In accordance with the Stipulation of the parties dated June 4,
1992, the Court now enters the following orders SATsHavs to Practice
Book §220(C), in order to insure the expeditious conduct of the
depositions of expert witnesses.
1. No formal process beyond the issuance of a notice of
deposition shall be necessary in order to oblige the party identifying
an expert witness to produce that expert witness for deposition. If
either party feels that it is necessary to issue a subpoena duces
tecum in conjunction with a notice of deposition, counsel for the
party identifying the expert will accept service of that subpoena on
behalf of the expert witness.
2. With regard to expert witnesses who reside in states other
than Connecticut, the party who intends to call that witness at trial
will determine whether the deposition will be taken in Connecticut or
in the witness's home state. Any costs incurred by the witness for
travel, lodging, meals or other similar expenses incident to the
appearance at the deposition shall be the exclusive responsibility of
the party who intends to call that witness at trial.
3. The party taking the deposition of an expert under this Order
shall pay the expert at the hourly rates agreed to by the parties for
all time spent in the deposition and for a reasonable amount of
preparation time, not to exceed 3 hours of preparation.
4. If additional experts are identified in the future, the
parties shall confer and arrive at comparable rates of payment for
each such expert. Any dispute resolving deposition rates for future
experts shall be resolved by the Court.
5. Reimbursement for the fees associated with the attendance of
expert witnesses at depositions shall be paid within sixty days of
submission of an invoice for each expert.
6. The party listing any person as an expert witness shall
reimburse the party taking such deposition for any such payments if
the expert deposed is subsequently not called as a witness at trial.
The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. shall be the
guarantor with respect to any amounts plaintiffs may owe to defendants
under this paragraph, and the State Department of Education shall be
the guarantor with respect to any amounts defendants may owe under
this paragraph. Such obligations under this paragraph shall not
exceed $2,500 per deposition.
7. The defendants may not seek reimbursement from the plaintiffs
for the time spent in preparation for or at a deposition by any
individual who is a regular employee of the State Department of
Education or the State Department of Housing at the time of their
deposition regardless of whether the defendants have designated that
person as an expert witness or not.
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Harry Hammer
Superior Court
Dated this day of June, 1992.
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL
ATTORNEY GENERAL
MacKenzie Hall
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, CT 06105
FAX (203) 523-5536
Office of The Attornev General : Tel: 566-7173
State of Connecticut
June 2, 1992
Philip Tegeler, Esq.
Connecticut Civil Liberties Union
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
RE: Sheff v. O'Neill, Docket No. CV 89-0360977S
Dear Phil:
Pursuant to our recent conversations I am writing this
letter to confirm our agreement regarding the hourly rates for
the depositions of those individuals whose identity has been
disclosed to date. This letter is being written pursuant to
paragraph 3 of the order governing the depositions of expert
witnesses which we have been discussing.
Plaintiffs' Experts
a. Dr. Jomills Henry Braddock, II -- $150 per hour;
b. Dr. Christopher Collier -- $110 per hour:
C. Dr. Robert L. Crain -- $150 per hour;
d. Dr. Marvin F. Dawkins =-- $130 per hour
e. Dr. Mary Kennedy -- $150 per hour;
f. Dr. William Trent =-- $130 per hour;
g. Dr. Charles V. Willie -- $150 per hour;
h. Dr. Catherine E. Walsh -- $130 per hour;
i. Yale Rabin =-- $130 per hour;
Jj. Ruth Price -- $110 per hour;
ke. John Allison -- $110 per hour;
l. Hernan LaFontaine =-- $110 per hour.
Defendants' Experts
a. Christine Rossell, Ph.D. =-- $150 per hour;
b. David Armor, Ph.D. =-- $150 per hour;
Cc. G. Donald Ferree -- $90 per hour;
d. Pasquale Forgione, Ph.D. -- $150 per hour;
e. Lloyd Calvert -- $110 per hour;
f. Thomas E. Steahr, Ph.D. -- $110 per hour;
In addition I am writing to confirm that the following
individuals are regular state employees who fall within the
exception found in paragraph 7 of the order regarding the
Philip Tegeler, Esq.
May 20, 1992
Page 2
depositions of expert witnesses: Douglas Rindone, William
Congero, Peter Behuniak, Elliot Williams, Robert Brewer, Peter
Prowda, Theodore Sergi, Thomas Breen and Patricia Downs.
If the defendants call these individuals as witnesses they
will be called because of work they have done in the normal
course of their employment and their testimony will be offered
in the normal course of their employment. Since the defendants
will incur no additional expense by reason of their testimony no
fees for their time will be requested.
Two of the individuals we have employed as expert witnesses
are also state employees but they have been specially retained by
this office for the purpose of this case. These individuals are
Thomas Steahr and G. Donald Ferree. Pursuant to the agreement
which we have reached it is understood that these two individuals
do not fall within the provisions of paragraph 7 and that the
rates set forth above will be paid by the plaintiffs.
Please acknowledge the terms of the agreement which we have
reached and which are set out above by signing the acknowledgment
found below on behalf of the plaintiffs.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very. truly yours,
RICHARD/B EN L
ATTOE N
BY: i 4 Ke
Asgigtant Attorney General
JRW/mu /
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
V/A
Philip Tegeler, Esq.
Counsel for the Plaintiffs