Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (Rule 65, Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure)

Public Court Documents
April 29, 1982

Cite this item

Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (Rule 65, Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure) preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 7fd9db50-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (Rule 65, Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure), 1982. 7fd9db50-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/de013cdb-f052-467e-a290-2bdf029beb1a/gingles-v-edmisten-and-pugh-v-hunt-notice-of-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-or-temporary-restraining-order-rule-65-fed-rules-of-civil-procedure. Accessed October 09, 2026.

Copied!

    RALPH GINGLES,

Plaintiffs,

RUFUS ED}IIISTEN,

Defendants.

Plaintiffs,

AI{ES
1.,

Defendants.

V.

B.

v

NT

TI

FOR

GLES

S,

ISTE

s.

UGH,

S,

!

HUNl

S.

NOTI

PU

fs

H

-5

\7-IV-C

ON

NA

.CI

6-C

roN

3-

66

RICT
ORTH

No.

No.

ARY I

*,,1,

PREI,I

ST
ST
GH

t

OR

THE UNITED
EASTERN DI

RALEI

t aI.,

et aI.,

aI. ,

R., etc. , e

E

e

t

J

IN
THE

,€

vs.

N,

et

s.

,J

CE

IST
FN
ION

I\,IIN

COURT
CAROLI

B1-8 0

81-10

NJUNCTF MOTION

Deputy Attorney General for i,I,egal Affairs
Attorney ceneril's office I
P. O. Box 629 i

Raleigh, North Carolina 276.02
i

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned wj-l1 bring the

attached'motion for a prelimirr.ryf injunction on for hearing before
I

a United States District Court Jtilqe of the Eastern District of
I

North Carolina at the United Statres Courthouse in Raleigh, Nort'h
I

Carotina on Friday, April 30, 19q2, dt 9:00 a.m. of that day or
I

.aq qrrrrn thareafter as counsel can be heard.as soon thereafter as counsel 
:"1

JAMES WALLACE
Attorney for Defendants

This the 29L!;r day of APril, AQ82.

BURKE & DONALDSON
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
et aI
309 North Main Street
Salisburl,', North Carolina
Telephone: 704-637-1500

Robert N. Hunter, JF.
HUNTER, HODGMAN, GREENE &

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
et al.
P. O. Box 3245

AIan V. Pugh,

28144

GOODMAN
Alan V. Pugh,

Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Telepho4e: 9L9-373-0934

i

t

I

I
i

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (Rule 65, Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure)

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in