Correspondence from Winter to Clerk Re: Supplement to F.R.A.P. 28 (j) Letter

Correspondence
December 27, 1982

Correspondence from Winter to Clerk Re: Supplement to F.R.A.P. 28 (j) Letter preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Garner Working Files. Correspondence from Winter to Clerk Re: Supplement to F.R.A.P. 28 (j) Letter, 1982. 1dad5499-34a8-f011-bbd3-000d3a53d084. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/df797340-dd29-46c7-9c00-b834ec1a5ea0/correspondence-from-winter-to-clerk-re-supplement-to-frap-28-j-letter. Accessed June 27, 2026.

    Copied!

    Jt

egal «fenseFi ^ H u n d
N A A C P  L E G A L  D E F E N S E  A N D  E D U C A T I O N A L  F U N D ,  I NC.  

10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019* (212) 586-8397

December 27, 1982

Hon. John P. Hehman, Clerk 
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Sixth Circuit 
U.S. Post Office & Courthouse Bldg.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Re; Garner v. Memphis Police Department, 
5605

Case No. 81-

Dear Sir:
I am writing to supplement my F.R.A.P. 28 (j) letter of 

December 23, 1982. In reviewing the advance sheets this 
morning, I came across the case of Webster v. City of 
Houston, 689 F.2d 1220 (5th Cir. 1982). I believe that 
Webster will be of substantial interest to the court. The 
Webster decision relates to the arguments made in Points I, 
II, IV, and V of appellant's main brief and Point III of the 
reply brief as follows:

1. Webster, supra, 689 F.2d at 1226-27 —  Widespread 
practice of use of "throw-down" weapons by Houston 
Police Department constitutes "[i]nformal actions 
... which ... tacitly encourages police officers 
to use excessive force...." (Point I at 28-29; 
Point IV; Point V).

2. at 1227 —  Use of deadly force against unarmed 
17 year old violates the victim's rights "to live, 
to be free of excessive force, to face the charges 
against him, and to defend himself on those 
charges." (Point II).

3. Id. at 1225-27 —  Court discusses parameters of 
municipal liability for unwritten policy or custom 
under Monell. (Point V).

Contributions are deductible for U.S. income tax purposes

The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People although it 
was founded by it and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDFhashad for over 25 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget.



Hon. John P, Hehman, Clerk Page 2
December 27, 1982

4. at 1228 —  Municipality is not entitled to
qualified immunity based on good faith of 
municipal officials. (Reply Brief Point III).

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,

-t._

Steven L. Winter
SLW/ac
cc: Henry L. Klein, Esq.

Walter L. Bailey, Jr., Esq.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.