Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to James U. Blacksher Re Swint v. Pullman-Standard
Correspondence
June 8, 1987

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to James U. Blacksher Re Swint v. Pullman-Standard, 1987. 2b6144e7-eb92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e051dca4-1588-46f1-a528-2c31c15ff11e/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-james-u-blacksher-re-swint-v-pullman-standard. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
Les.,EDrenseE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10019 o (2121Zt 9..l900 June 8, 1987 Janes U. Blacksher, Esg. Blacksher, Menefee & Stein 405 Van Antwerp Building P.O. Box 1051 Mobile, AL 36533 Re: Swlnt v. pullman-standard Dear Jim: Here ls the check for the expenses you asked for in swint. You should be getting a copy of Ericts diaft brief soon. rrm afraid werve run lnto a bit of a snag wlth the otherreimbursements. rt11 be sending you a longer-Ietter with regardto them fairly aoon. The basLc pioblen seems to be that theie'sinsufficient detall with respect to a bunch of the stuff for the l-oney people here to be comfortable with the idea that we can getthe money back when we urtimately go after the defendants I have to be in Arkansas for the rest of this week, but IrlIcall you as soon as I get back. Yours, Contributiorts are deduttible lor U.S. incomz tan purpo*s The ilMCp Lcgat thtense & Educational hrnd, lnc. (LDD is not part ol the National Association lor the Mvarpement ol Colorod PeoPte 1ilMgq.6orrn iii-f iiJtouniio ovttri iiuCiino itrires its cbmmitmenr to eqriat rights. LDF has had lor over25years a separate Board, program, statl, otlicc and budget.