Assistance to Voters (Notes from Senate Hearings)
Working File
January 27, 1982

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Winner to Guinier, Suitts, Klein, and Williams; Motion to Consolidate; Response of Gingles' Plaintiffs to Motion to Consolidate, 1982. 21726977-d792-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4ba80faf-b975-49ef-991b-60458b459fc3/correspondence-from-winner-to-guinier-suitts-klein-and-williams-motion-to-consolidate-response-of-gingles-plaintiffs-to-motion-to-consolidate. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
o 'i-(iL JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS JAMES E, FERGUSON, II MELVIN L. WATT JONATHAN WALLAS KARL AOKINS JAMES C, FULLER. JR. YVONNE MIMS EVANS JOHN W, GRESHAM RONALO L. GIBSON GILDA F, GLAZER LESLIE J. WINNER JOHN T. NOCKLEBY' . OF O, C. BAR ONLY CHAMBERS. FERGUSON, WATT, WALLAS, ADKINS & FULLER, P.A ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 73O EAST INOEPENOENCE PLAZA 951 SOUTH INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 24202 TELEPHONE (704) 375-445r June 3, 1982 Ms. Lani Guinier NAACP Legal Defense Fund Suite 2030 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Mr. Steve Suitts Southern Regional Council 75 Marietta Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Richard Klein Legal Services of North Carolina Post Office Box 6505 Raleigh, North Carolina 27628 Mr. Napoleon Williams Legal Defense Fund Suite 2030 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Re: Gingles v. Edmisten Dear Folks: Enclosed is a copy of a Motion to Consolidate and our response to it. After my discussion with Chambers, w€ agreed that we need to be kept informed of the proceedings in Cavanagh v. Brock since if the Cavanagh plaintiffs win, we will automaticaffy- 1ose. The Cavanagh plaintiffs seek a declaration that counties that are not SecLion 5 counties may not be divided. Chambers also suggests that we may want to intervene as defendants in Cavanagh v. Brock whether or not the actions are consolidated. @ thoughts about that, pLease let me know. Thank you. LJW: ddb Enclosures Winner C,, 7i,*. \; [tAY t o p,t , mmf;ffiS. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CSURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH DIVISION FtrLED tvt1lp ruae RALPH GINGLES, et dl., Pl aj nt i ffs, V. RUFUS EDMISTEN, etc., et a'l ., Defend ants . ALAN V. PUGH, et a'l ., Plajntiffs, V. JAMES B, HUNT, JR., etc', et dl., Defendants. J0HN J. CAVANAGH, et a1., Plaint'iffs, V. ALEX K. BROCK, etc., et al. i Defendants. ) .1. RrcH .ro^o*il..**) u. s. DrsTRrcr counf.. ) ) clvlL N0. 81-803-CIV-f' Dlsr' No' cAR'- ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 81-1066.CIV-5 CIVIL NO.82.545.CIV-5 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE C0ME NOI^I the defendant.s jn each of the above-entitled actions, and move the court to order a complete consolidation of the above-entitled actions, for all purposes, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civ'il Procedure. In support of the mot'ion, and as grounds therefor, defendants state: 1. Each of the above entitled act jons chal lenges the apport'ionment p'lans for the House of Representatjves and Senate of the North Caroljna General Assembly, although p1a'intiffs John J. Cavanagh, et dl., have challenged only those portions of the plans insofar as they pertain to Forsyth County, Z. Each actjon involves common questions of law and fact relating to.the enact- ment of redistrict'ing plans for the North Carolina House and Senate in compliance with the United States Constitution, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 51973) and the North Carolina Constitut'ion. Ref ief , if any, granted to any of the plaint'iffs relating to 'legislative apportionment must be consistent. 1. The defendants in each action are essent'ial ly the same, a'lthough pl aint'iff s John J. Cavanagh, et al., have named only the Executive Director and members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections as defendants, wtrjle plaintiffs Ralph G1ng1es, et dl ., and Alan V. Pugh, et dl ., have inc'luded as defendants additional State off jcers act'ing 'in their off ici al capacities. ( 4. The defendants'defenses to each action are the same or inseparably inter- C rel ated. 5. Each action seeks to represent a class and who seek'relief which may be inconsistent' No preiudice to any party wil.l result from Conso'lidation will .avoid mult'ip1ic'ity of suits, thetical judgments, will save considerable time and al 1 part i es , w'i I I exped i te the present at'ion and will be in the furtherance of just'ice' wtr jch inc'l udes overl app'ing members a consolidation of said actions. w'i I I avo'id conf I i ct i ng or ant'i - and expense for the court, counsel, of ev i'dence at tr i a} ' proceed i ng s , Respectfully submitted, this the /) day of May, 1982' RUFUS L. EDMISTEN ATTORNEY GENERAL Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 733-3377 Norma Harrel I Ti are B. Srn'i 1eY Assistant AttorneYs General John L as s'i ter Associ ate AttorneY General Jerri s Leonard Kathleen Heenan * Jerris Leonard & Assoc'iates, P.C. 900 17th Street, N'W, Su'ite 1020 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone z (?0?) 872-1095 Attorneys for Defendants -2- allage' rJf . Attorney General Post Office Box 629 ry' Leqal Af f ai rs 1 Oeiartment of Just'ice (,..6 I CERTiFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby cert'ify that I have this day served the foregoing Motion to upon pla.intiffs, Attorneys by placing a copy of same in the United States Office, postage prepa'id, addressed to: J. Levonne Chambers Leslie l'linner Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Hallas, Adk'ins & Ful1er, P.A. 951. South Independence Boulevard Charlotte, North Carol'ina ?8?02 Jack Greenberg James M. Nabrit, III Lani Gu'inier 10 Col umbus C'ircle New York, New York 100i9 ./ Arthur J. Donaldson Burke, Donaldson, l-lolshouser & Kenerly 309 North Mai n Street Sal i sburY, North Carol'ina 28t44 : Robert N. Hunter, Jr. / AttorneY at Law Post 0ffice Box 3245 201 West Market Street Greensboro, North Caroljna 2740?. Ham'i I ton C. Horton , Jr . Whiting, Horton and Hendrick 450 NCNB Pl aza Hinston-Sa1em, North Carolina 27L01 Wayne T. El I 'iot , Esq Southeastern Legal Foundat'ion 1800 CenturY Boulevard, Sujte 950 At1 anta, Georgi a 30345 This the /L day of Consolidate Post -3- L-. IN THE I]NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MLEIGH DIVISION RALPH GINGLES, et a1., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 81-803-Civ-5 ) RUFUS EDMISTEN, ete., et al., ) Defendants. ) ) ALLAN V. PUGH, €t a1., ) Plaintiffs, ) J ciril Action No. 81-1066-civ-5v. ) ) JAMES B. HUNT, JR., etc, et al., ) Defendants. ) ) JOHN J. CAVANAGH, €L a1., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 82-545-Civ-5 ) ALEX K. BROCK, etc., et at., ) Defendants. ) RESPONSE OF GINGLES' PLAINTIFFS TO MOTION TO CONSOL]DATE Plaintiffs in Gingles v. Edmisten, 8l-803-Civ-5 do not oppose defendants' Motion to Consolidate the three actions captioned above. Plaintiffs, however, request that any order of consolidation contain provisions which will avoid delay of the trial in Gingles v. Edmisten due to the consolidation. In support of this requesL, the Gingles' plaintiffs show the Court the following: 1. Gingles v. Edmisten was filed in September, 1981, approximately seven months prior to the filing of Cavanagh v. Brock. 2. The Court has requested that the parties to Gingles v. Edmisted and Pugh v. Hunt agree on a discovery deadline for those two actions. 3. The time required to complete discovery in Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt is shorter than the normal amount of discovery which would be allowed for a newly filed action. L-_ This day of June, L982. Chambers, Ferguson, trIatt, Wallas , Adkins & Fuller, P.A. Suite 730 East Independence PLaza 951 South lndependence Soulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 704 / 37 s-846L JACK GREENBERG NAPOLEON I^IILLIAMS LANI GUIN]ER NAACP Legal Defense Fund 10 Columbus Circle Suite 2030 New York, New York 10019 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the fore- going Response of Gingles' Plaintiffs to Motion to Consolidate upon aL1 other counsel by placing a copy of same in the United States Post Office, postage prepaid, addressed to: Mr. James Wallace, Jr. N.C. Department of Justice Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carol-ina 27602 Mr. Jerris Leonard Jerris Leonard & Assoc., P.C. 900 17th Street, NW suite 1020 Washington, DC 20006 Mr. Wayne T. Elliot Southeastern Legal Foundation 1800 Century Boulevard, Suite 950 Atlanta, Georgia 30345 Mr. Arthur J. Donaldson Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & Kenerly 309 North Main Street Salisbury, North Carolina 28L44 Mr. Hamilton C. Horton, Jr. I,lhiting, Horton & Hendrick 450 NCNB Plaza I^/inston-Sal-em, North Carolina 27LjL This the .V day of June , 1982. LESLIE J. V,IINNER -2-