Order Granting Intervenor Motions

Public Court Documents
March 12, 1989

Order Granting Intervenor Motions preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order Granting Intervenor Motions, 1989. 7e69d98d-227c-f011-b4cc-7c1e52649b7e. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e0ac36e9-8bbd-4382-9fbf-70829110e97d/order-granting-intervenor-motions. Accessed December 24, 2025.

    Copied!

    U. 5. DISTRICT COURT 

B 

UNITED STATES DISTRICY COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION 

IAN ALy ET Al. 

Va. MO-88-CA-154 

JIM MATTOX:s ET Al.» 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cause came on for hearing before the 

Court on February 27, 1989, on Motions of various parties to 

Intervene. This suit was brought by Plaintiff for declaratory 

judgment that the present method of electing district judges in 

Texas dilutes the minority voting strength of Mexican-American 

and Black citizens in violation of the 14th and 15th Amendments 

Constitution and the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.5.C. 

consideration of the Motions and arguments of the 

parties. t Court 1s of the opinion that the following Order 

appropriate: 

3 J I" 
IT 31S ORDERED that the Motions to Intervene of the “Houston 

Travis Lawyers Association, the District Judges of Dallas and 

County, Harris County Judge Wood% the Legislative Black Caucus 

and Dallas County Judge Entz, in their individual capacity, are 

hereby GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: ‘that Midland: County’s Motion for  



  

Reconsideration is hereby DENIED. a 

SIGNED AND ENTERED this (= day of March, 1989.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.