Plaintiff-Appellees' Response to Entz' Motion to Establish Expedited Briefing Schedule
Public Court Documents
January 24, 1990
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Plaintiff-Appellees' Response to Entz' Motion to Establish Expedited Briefing Schedule, 1990. 1fa8e97b-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdd81421. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e15beece-4ca1-436d-92cd-313009925e52/plaintiff-appellees-response-to-entz-motion-to-establish-expedited-briefing-schedule. Accessed November 07, 2025.
Copied!
LAW OFFICES OF
TEXAS RURAL LEGAL AID. INC.
201 NORTH ST. MARY'S ST.. SUITE 600
SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78205
(512) 222-2478
January 24, 1990
Gilbert F. Ganacheau, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
Re: LULAC et al v Mattox et al
No. 90-8014
Dear Mr. Ganacheau:
I am enclosing an original and four copies of the Plaintiff-
Appellees’ Response to Entz’ Motion to Establish Expedited Briefing
Schedule. Could you kindly file them at your convenience and bring
them to the attention of the panel that will hear this matter?
In addition, I am enclosing a stamped return envelope. Could you
kindly mark one of the copies with your filemark and return it to
me?
In advance, thank you for your attention to this matter,
Si erely yours
Susan Finkelstein
Staff Attorney
federal express
xc: all counsel of record (certified)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
LULAC, et al.,
Plaintiff-Appellees,
NO. 90-8014 VS.
MATTOX, et al.,
*
F
¥
F
*
¥
¥
*
*
Defendant-Appellants.
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES’ RESPONSE TO ENTZ’ MOTION
TO ESTABLISH EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
1. Defendant-intervenor-appellant Entz has requested that
this Court establish an expedited schedule for the consideration
of this appeal. Plaintiff-appellees oppose this request.
2 As this Court noted in its Order filed on January 11,
1990, "[o]lnly if it becomes apparent that the state is unwilling
to act with measured and appropriate speed ... should our courts
intervene" in this important voting rights issue. Slip Opinion
at 2. In this vein, "the Court’s order authorizes expedition of
these consolidated appeal, should the Texas Legislature fail to
resolve the issues on appeal." Letter of January 11, 1990 to
Counsel from Chief Deputy Clerk Windhorst, Jr. Exhibit A.
3. This action by the Court is totally appropriate. The
Texas Legislature may eliminate the need for this Court’s
intervention in this case if the legislature appropriately revamps
the judicial election system in the special session due to start
on February 27, 1990'. Out of respect for the legislature and in
the interest of avoiding unnecessary judicial review in this
sensitive area, this Court should not act now.
4, Further, if the legislature acts in an inappropriate
manner, there may be new issues for this Court to address. In the
interests of judicial economy, it makes sense for this Court to
resolve those potential new issues at the same time as the issues
now pending before the Court.
5. Alternatively, the schedule proposed by Entz is too
strict. This case poses significant issues that require full
exploration by this Court after full briefing by the parties. If
the Court sets a briefing schedule while the Texas legislature is
still in session, Plaintiff-appellees suggest that the Court use
its normal rules for briefing of issues in this case.
Respectfully submitted:
GARRETT, THOMPSON & CHANG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A Partnership of Professional
Corporations
William L. Garrett
Brenda Hull Thompson
8300 Douglas #800
Dallas, Texas 75225
(214)369-1952
LEAD COUNSEL
ROLANDO L. RIOS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
201 N. St. Mary's #521
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(512)222-2102
The Governor has placed the system of electing judges on the
call for this session.
SUSAN FINKELSTEIN
STAFF ATTORNEY
TEXAS RURAL LEGAL AID, INC.
201 N. St. Mary's #600
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(512)222-2478
on LL ter ili
7 FOR ius
ay OF SERVICE
I, Susan Finkelstein, do hereby certify that a true and
correct copy of Plaintiff-appellees’ Response to Entz’ Motion to
Establish Expedited Briefing Schedule has been mailed via certified
mail to:
ATTORNEY : REPRESENTING
Plaintiff - Intervenors
Edward B. Cloutman, III Joan Winn White,
MULLINAX, WELLS, BAAB & Jesse Oliver & Fred
CLOUTMAN, P. C. Tinsley
3301 Elm
Dallas, TX 75226-9222
(214)939-9222
E. Brice Cunningham Joan Winn White,
ATTORNEY AT LAW Jesse Oliver & Fred
777 S. R. L. Thornton Fwy, Tinsley
Suite 121
Dallas, TX 75203
214/428-3793
Julius Levonne Chambers Houston Lawyers Assn.
Sherrilyn A. Ifill Francis Williams
NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Rev. William Lawson
Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson St., 16th floor
New York, NY 10013
212/219-1900
Gabrielle K. McDonald
MATTHEWS & BRANSCOMB
301 Congress Ave., Suite 2050
Austin, TX 78701
512/320-5055
Defendants
Jim Mattox
Mary F. Keller
Renea Hicks
Javier Guajardo
Attorney General's Office
P. O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711
512/463-2085
Defendant-Intervenors
J. Eugene Clements
E. O'Neill
Evelyn V. Keys
PORTER & CLEMENTS
700 Louisiana, Suite 3500
Houston, TX 77002-2730
713/226-0600
Darrell Smith
Attorney at Law
10999 Interstate Highway 10,
Suite 905
San Antonio, TX 78230
512/641-9944
Michael J. Wood
Attorney at Law
440 Louisiana, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77002
713/228-5105
Mark H. Dettman
County Attorney
P. 0. Box 2559
Midland, TX 79702
915/688-1084
Ken Oden
Travis County Attorney
P. O. Box 1748
Austin, TX 78767
512/473-9415
Houston Lawyers Assn.
Francis Williams
Rev. William Lawson
Texas Legislative
Black Caucus
All Defendants
Judge Sharolyn Wood
of Harris County
Judge Sharolyn Wood
of Harris County
Judge Sharolyn Wood
of Harris County
Midland County &
District Judges
Travis County District
Judges
David R. Richards
Special Counsel
600 W. 7th St.
Austin, TX 78701
Robert H. Mow, Jr.
HUGHES & LUCE
2800 Momentum Place
1717 Main St.
Dallas, TX 75201
214/939-5500
Seagal V. Wheatley
Oppenheimer, Rosenberg, Kelleher
& Wheatley, Inc.
711 Navarro, 6th Floor
San Antonio, Texas 78205
512-224-2000
FAX 512-224-7540
John L. Hill, Jr.
Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon
Texas Commerce Tower
Houston, Texas 77002
713-226-1200
FAX 713-223-3717
Tom Rugg
Assistant District Attorney
Jefferson County Courthouse
Beaumont, Texas 77701
Travis County District
Judges
Judge Harold Entz
of Dallas County
Bexar County District
Judges
George Bayoud
Jefferson County
District Judges
each at the correct address on this 24th day of January, 1990.
, fda Lalicn
didi ila FOR PLAINTIFF
4 | | ® 24 a J
United States Court of Appeals
FIFTH CIRCUIT PELEIVERN
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TEL. 504-589-6514
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU
otf Reon CLERK :
hE rh 600 CAMP STREET
"NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 January 11, 1990 :
BASE. unin
TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD:
No. 90-8014 League of United Latin American Citizens
ve William P. Clements, Et Al. ET Em mm tr ay rl
(DC# MO-88-CA-154) .
Misc. - No. 90-9003 League of United Latin American Citizens ve William P. Clements, Et Al. EH ET TT EE CEE Em Tm oo
(DC# MO-88-CA-154)
Dear Counsel:
This is to confirm .our telephone advice of today that the Court, late yesterday afternoon, entered three enclosed orders in the above referenced causes, which I am sure are self-explanatory.
Since the Court has granted the interlocutory application in number 90-9003, and has ordered consolidation of the appeals, the parties are advised that the interlocutory appeal has now been transferred into the general docket number 90-8014. That number covers all appeals taken, and the parties should refer only to that docket number when filing future documents.
Please note that the Court's order authorizes expedition of these consolidated appeals, should the Texas Legislature fail to resolve the issues on appeal.
We will await further advice from the parties if expedition of the appeals become necessary and an expedited briefing schedule 1s required, etc.
Very truly yours,
GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU, =
by
7
—tichara E. Windhorst, Jr.
Chief Deputy Clerk i
REW: 1mc
encls.
PLAINTIFF'S
ant