Correspondence from Greenberg to Guinier
Correspondence
January 29, 1982

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Supreme Court Asked to Review Conviction of Howard U. Law Student, 1959. 146e3c81-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b15896fd-6659-44a7-9ca2-5f17cbbc1da4/supreme-court-asked-to-review-conviction-of-howard-u-law-student. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
” PRESS RELEASE @ @ NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE « NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS Oe THURGOOD MARSHALL President Director-Counsel S > Ve pt: yt SUPREME COURT ASKED TO REVIEW CONVICTION OF HOWARD U. LAW STUDENT WASH., D.C.--The United States Supreme Court was asked this week to review the arrest and conviction of a Howard University Law student for refusing to leave an interstate bus terminal restaurant when he was denied service and ordered out by the management. The student, Bruce Boynton, was arrested in December, 1958, at the Trailways Bus Terminal in Richmond, Va. while en route to his home in Selma, Ala. He boarded the Trailways bus in Washington, D. C. When the bus made its regular 45-minute stop at the Richmond Terminal, Boynton went into the waiting room along with the other pa¢c- sengers. Upon entering he found the small restaurant serving Negro passengers was crowded and then went into another one at the end of the waiting room which was practically empty. A white waitress informed him that they did not serve Negroes anc advised him to go to the colored restaurant. When Boynton explained that the colored restaurant was crowded and that he was an interstate passenger and wanted to be served before his bus departed, the waitres called the assistant manager. The assistant manager demanded that Boynton leave and when he refused, had him arrested for trespassing. The Howard University student was convicted in the police court of Richmond and fined $10. The conviction was twice appealed but up- held by the city and state courts. The case was taken to the U. S. Supreme Court Tuesday, September 15, by attorneys for the N.A.A.C,P. Legal Defense and Educational Fund. In their petition the attorneys charged that the lower courts' deci- sions were contrary to decisions already rendered by the high Court prohibiting racial discrimination in interstate travel. The arrest and conviction of Mr. Boynton was said to invoke the state's criminal law machinery to enforce racial discrimination thereby "conflicting with the long consistent line of decision" in the Supreme Court. N.A.A.C.P, Legal Defense Fund attorneys for the law student are Thurgood Marshall, Conétance Baker Motley and Jack Greenberg, all of New York. Local counéel are Martin A. Martin and Clarence W. Newsome of Richmond, Va. “30's