4th Circuit Opinion and Application for Extension of Time
Public Court Documents
June 12, 1967

12 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Green v. New Kent County School Board Working files. 4th Circuit Opinion and Application for Extension of Time, 1967. af50a3a0-6d31-f011-8c4e-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e2209026-6876-4e98-bc53-a7fcbc68bfe3/4th-circuit-opinion-and-application-for-extension-of-time. Accessed June 04, 2025.
Copied!
p., Richmond, Va. 23208 HEN TAT LS OURT 0 Ee APPE AY Q ED STAT Eo COl Ki Uk APPEALS No. 10,792. - Charles C. Green, Carroll A. Green and Robert C. Green, infants, by Calvin C. Green and Mary O. Green, their father and mother and next friends, and all others of the plaintiffs, Appellants, versus County School Loard of New Kent County, Virginia, et al, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DisTrRicT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DistricT OF VIRGINIA, AT RICHMOND. Journ D. BuTzNER, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE. (Argued January 9, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967.) Before HaynsworTH, Chief Judge, and SoBELoFF, BORE- MAN, Bryan, J. Spencer BeLL,¥ WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. : S. W. Tucker (Henry L. Marsh, III, Willard H. Douglas, Jr., Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit, III, on brief) for Appellants, and Frederick T. Gray (Williams, Mullen & Christian on brief) for Appellees. * Judge Bell sat as a member of the Court when the case was heard but died before it was decided. PER CURIAM The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as those we have considered and decided today in Bowman v. County School Bd. of Charles City County.’ For the reasons stated there, the rulings of the District Court merit our substantial approval, but the case is neces- sarily remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the District Court’s order and our opinion in Bowman. Remanded. 2a Or, ooo F.2d (Decided this day). The special concurring opinion of Judge Sobeloff, in which Judge Winter joins, in Bowman is applicable to this case also. &u s ~ § ¢ | 4 & fa "3 Vs § » “ 4 ., Richmond, Va. 23208 ha & fa i A TES CO UR wr OF AF p PEAL ¥ WV; i A ES 1 1 RT i 31 FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT LR. RAN No 10,792. Charles C. Green, Carrolb A. Green and Robert C. Green, infants, by Calvin C. Green and Mary O. Green, their father and mother and next friends, and all others of the plaintiffs, Appellants, versus County School Eoard of New Kent County, Virginia, et al., Appellees. ArPEAL FROM THE UNItep StATES District COURT FOR THE EASTERN DisTrICT OF VIRGINIA, AT RICHMOND. JouN D. BUuTzZNER, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE (Argued January 9, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967.) Before HaynsworTH, Chief Judge, and SoBeLoFF, BORE- MAN, BryaN, J. SPENceErR BeLrL,* WINTER “and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. | S. W. Tucker (Henry L. Marsh, III, Willard H. Douglas, Jr., Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit, I1I, on brief) for Appellants, and Frederick T. Gray (Williams, Mullen & Christian on brief) for Appellees. * Judge Bell sat as a member of the Court when the case was heard but died before it was decided. fa - PER CURIAM : The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as those we have considered and decided today in Bowman v. County School Bd. of Charles City County.’ For the reasons stated there, the rulings of the District Court merit our substantial approval, but the case is neces- sarily remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the District Court’s order and our opinion in Bowman. Remanded. 14. Cir, (Decided this day). The special concurring opinion of hich Judge Winter joins, in Bowman is applicable to this case also. .» Richmond, Va. 23208 NIT TATES COIIRT OF APPEAYC UNITED § Si TES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10,792. Charles C. Green, Carroll A. Green 2 id Robert C. Green, infants, by Calvin C. ir and Mary O. Green, their father and mother and next friends, and all others of the plaintiffs, Appellants, VETSUS County School Loard of New Kent County, Virginia, et al,, Appellees. AprPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DisTrRiIcT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DisTricT oF VIRGINIA, AT RICHMOND. JouN D. BUTZNER, JRr., DISTRICT JUDGE. (Argued January 9, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967.) Before HaynswortH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF¥, BORE- MAN, Bryan, J. SpExcer BeLr,* WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc. : S. W. Tucker (Henry L. Marsh, III, Willard H. Douglas, Jr., Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit, 111, on brief) for Appellants, and Frederick T. Gray (Williams, Mullen & Christian on brief) for Appellees. * Tudee Bell sat as 2a member of the Court when the case was heard but died oo before it was decided. & or PER CURIAM : The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as those we have considered and decided today in Bowman v. County School Bd. of Charles City County.’ For the reasons stated there, the rulings of the District Court merit our substantial approval, but the case is neces- sarily remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the District Court’s order and our opinion in Bowman. Remanded. 24 Cir. Fad... (Decided this day). The special concurring opinion of Judge Sobeloff, in which Judge Winter joins, in Bowman is applicable to this case also. EL i Ba il ie i m t — — — — — — r i t e — — — — — — — — — — e s ee e———— A — — — — — — — — — — r n — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — s e — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — a m e n — — ; ae 3 5 = : a £ i : - pe a pe f T i A hy wed * ke i % 8 4 grt / 4 a“ ay h ¥ x 2 W 3 8 d 3 : pe & ¢ ¥ % i w x & { ; » ’ » @ k F e . 4 i t " 4 pe ow 4 ” . . . bof § 4 # 5 5 3 Ey n fond i i | 3 ho 3 & ] y " t & 2 Y 4 : * » H ¥ : & i { - hs ¥ - ¥ } 2 n » 3 i = ) % | pi § 3 ¥ EE » 3 : 4 3 g bi ® $ ¥ 7 £ y a l he 1 i & i i v A 8 » i ity. 3 iy EN { : Hd # . i ' i lg \ ; : ! ] L £ Ee ib E i - i 3 ¥ wd x 5 ; ] 3 Hl ’ 3 3 ¥ i § ; i : H oy 3 gos x # : C i " y fo 3 fi ; We LG . F ' bl Es r o a d 5 ¢ py yb 4 pe : : | he a & " % — E » o F % # : " v wv at’) 3 G wr . g 5 * ov er — — a = — — — _ —— a A AE R A E T ul rh - — — x t s pe — » i — — — — L S A a — — — — — — — P — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — r — — - — — - — — — — — — — ¥ # : 3 i 4 4 § an a : ¥ 4 v Ei A ol " bia fi & {ik # “ ; § y 4 “ y ov V ‘ « fy ™ Th ol - 3 i — pd » bf l oq i . 3 pe b i 3 4 ; ; S.3 Sd _ : ; wi i s § we » RH " ” @ & i » # i oe ; ‘ ’ n » 4 ¥ del ¥ J 2. & Sa 7 ? ¥ E ; od . i i 5% y # % £ 4 > 4 P “ 5 i 3 l A = & Re - a # J 3 a “ 4 W : oo # 4 Y wd ¥ : - y di i» p a 3 3 3 4 3 3 bir . h ; : : ; us ) ’ Fuh i ind hc 4 % y 8 § ; 5 oN 2 prog! i ” 3 andl Mh | fo » & a aula 8 3 4 $ pr 4 % ; ‘ i all : f p . i cu en y 4 3 - ; t X o P 3 Gs 4 4 : : : - ; 1 % ry wo 1 4 — po :! ly % 1’ J et i a d ¥ N b # i i i # ia ) : A 3 4 ) : " » : © % ha n RO § : 3 ye a” 8 $ oh : : 7 kX : ¥ i > & 4 df A ¢ oll ig 2 BF i 2 i i 2 i : é. # § ¢ », % . 1 i i a Vo» ’ v d on, i 4 } § # ii i § ’ hic i ¢ wl Ri ® i % 3 { r s y il h k i a i w d % o i % i h . m y Ki Toy 1 ; y £ £2 « ra 5 k a ] god Fr =F Rr ia w id k . & #%, A y 0% ' ] -~ £ FE y . = a ¢ R i C . is # 3 ; p £3 iJ ow ) WV * wo po <3 %d - ad } Fh wed . i Bs Ry oi oS . ¢ - ) : Foi 5 " % ‘ # & & g { 3 id Fed " 4 - at . P 4 ” & 3 % { £ : : 3 ahi 3 i: #1 y y 3 # * » é ¥ 7d 4 4 3 i 3 4 . 3 ¥ ~ i ¥ ’ { £3 5 y nl ’ . . $ ¥ Ly . t i; we : fs y . bad - Sp Wi 4 p § a ¥ w hy . 5 A % x { PR i wa L A R hr AE R A Se, S R 3 et B E e t i a m h a a - > e e e — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — . - - h e : . . oe ce t n se - r e t i n p s s — i ———— — e T — — — — — — — — — — ~- E — — — — E E E — - & EN 3 3 h ’ 5 - h ind . 3 i & sid # a id d Yi # “ ! } 4 t of ; % P 7 : : - a] ¥ \ % . k i 4 i § ull dae o £ 2 p : y z a3 Fh £ f x h l b hate # 3 v # g ] 1 ’ 1 . i ‘ “th % ; ; % id w k . 4 . 3 . ” b 5 Pi 5 - % id hg y X 4 & i, £5 % ig . PS E — . # h, d e r Wr 3 ! - wd 4 3 , 4 ¥ : fy oh S b § : : * i 3 . wn Rik ‘ # g 1 Sil i i % a § » a Yo § y J : , ; 1 o | i hy 3 oh ; “ DO we 3 rT f a g " he h, : § ‘ ud ! 3 4 4 " 9 w ¥ Y i i i 3 iow : oR 3 uk d § 4 i i : jos : » 4 ¥ ¥ 1 # 1 wl i » i - s ba E ; ¥ ad ¥ ¢ Ko 3 z A & 2 ful FevE ] y Ne i Li P FS: ¢ 4 3 fv od » ard ual ¥ 2 a p . 5 y 3 oe u p i # " » 3 % i 3 F $i % Vw n i e . » Q % * pe ¥ ; § 3 / : ® j wr % | og k d e d ¥ k fd w WE as i S i 2 po % y ga i % par; J i : i ¥ i In bak gr 4 ¥ 2 o ; om ¢ - Ey od ¥ " P a bj . aot wd : 4 fia i L$ 3 : Wo 3 - n e We i x 5 N t kd . * g o ’ m 1 hd . oh & & " ¥ nd " Bird wi, #5 1 i ps " a” wh ¢ [3 ; i & w¥ P i 4 #4 " . { a § iW wi " : 3 ¥ 3 wi # : * » a & id J ag 1 = k e ] 4 H 9 » ow % d # [3 § #7 : J 7% a ] Td 3 * A ih : : ol £ i 2) ¥ : i ; # # Ted l ns pe and bs, ke if i Bes " a # § ge ] 8 » v ¥ ’ : ; w o e r e r — — — — | £3 ? : 3 i ~ 4 u * 3 a idl ud i wi 3 « Ww — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - = — — - er — — — — — — — . — E S — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r