Greenberg v. Veteran Statement Pursuant to Rule 3(g)
Public Court Documents
February 1, 1990
Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Greenberg v. Veteran Statement Pursuant to Rule 3(g), 1990. d13bf1c8-b79a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e2713049-78c6-4d81-af71-ea1ac798747c/greenberg-v-veteran-statement-pursuant-to-rule-3-g. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------ -
In the Matter of the Application of
MYLES GREENBERG and FRANCES M.
MULLIGAN,
89 Civ. 0591 (GLG)
Petitioners,
-against- STATEMENT PURSUANT
TO RULE 3(g)______
ANTHONY F. VETERAN, et. al.,
Respondents.
------------------------------------------ x
Pursuant to Civil Rule 3(g) of this Court, Petitioners
contend that the following are material facts as to which there
exists a genuine issue to be tried:
1. The written statement of Larry J. Nardecchia in
opposition to the incorporation petition was prepared prior to
November 1, 1988, and deliberately withheld from the public in
order to deny proponents of incorporation any opportunity to
challenge and/or controvert its contents prior to the Town
Supervisor's rendering an adverse determination on the subject
petition.
2. Mr. Nardecchia was not competent to review the boundary
description contained in the incorporation petition and, inter
alia, because of his incompetency he erroneously concluded that
that description was flawed and lacking in common certainty.
3. Mr. Nardecchia's findings, opinions, and conclusions with
respect to the boundary description are materially false.
1
4. The boundary description contained in the incorporation
petition contains no flaws and describes with common certainty
the boundary of the proposed village of Mayfair Knollwood.
5. The map of the proposed village of Mayfair Knollwood
created by officials of the Town of Greenburgh was prepared
solely on the basis of the boundary description contained in the
incorporation petition, and that map depicts and was intended to
depict with common certainty the boundary of the proposed
village.
6. The Nardecchia findings, opinions, and conclusions were
prepared on the direction of the Town Supervisor who had
pre-judged the incorporation petition and determined to reject it
prior to the date upon which the petition was filed with him.
7. The Nardecchia written statement was prepared by the Town
Engineer in his capacity as such, at the expense and upon
equipment provided by the Town of Greenburgh and during time for
which said Engineer was compensated by the Town.
8. Town Engineer, Larry J. Nardecchia, never filed evidence
satisfactory to the New York State Board for Engineering and Land
Surveying that he' is competent and experienced in land surveys as
2
contemplated by New York State Education Law §7208(m).
Dated: White Plains, N.Y.
February 1, 1990
ESQS.
Jonathan Lovett
Attorneys for Petitioners
180lE. Post Road
White Plains, N.Y. 10601
914-428-8401