Letter from Markham to Cox and Stein RE: Response to summary judgement and interrogatory signatures

Correspondence
November 8, 1999

Cite this item

Letter from Markham to Cox and Stein RE: Response to summary judgement and interrogatory signatures preview

1 page

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4214d62f-e80e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter from Markham to Cox and Stein RE: Response to summary judgement and interrogatory signatures, 1999. 4214d62f-e80e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e30c60c9-6220-4ed5-8995-38b2d276eed3/letter-from-markham-to-cox-and-stein-re-response-to-summary-judgement-and-interrogatory-signatures. Accessed June 14, 2025.

Copied!

    EVERETT & EVERETT 
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 

SUITE 300 

R.O. EVERETT (1878-1971) 301 W. MAIN STREET 
KATHRINE R. EVERETT (1893-1992) P.O. BOX 586 

ROBINSON O. EVERETT TEL: (919) 682-5691 
DAWN T. BATTISTE DurHAM, NoRrTH CAROLINA 27702 FAX: (919) 682-5469 
SANDRA G. HERRING 

OF COUNSEL 

ROBERT D. HOLLEMAN 

OF COUNSEL 

CRAIG M. KABATCHNICK 
(ADMITTED N.C., D.C.) Nov. 8, 1999 

Mr. Adam Stein 

Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, PA 
Suite 2, 312 W. Franklin St., 

Chapel Hill, NC 27516 

Mr. Todd Cox 

NAACP LDEF, Inc. 

1444 Eye St., NW 10" floor 
Washington, DC 20005 

Re: Response to Summary Judgment and Interrogatory Signatures 

Dear Adam and Todd: 

Enclosed is the Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, along 
with Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Affirmative Defense of Claim 
Preclusion and five attachments. 

According to our files, we are still missing the signatures of the Defendant-Intervenors for 
the Plaintiff's Interrogatories to Defendant-Intervenors. We would appreciate it if you could clear 
this up as soon as possible. 

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Dog Mobb 

Douglas E. Markham 

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter from Markham to Cox and Stein RE: Response to summary judgement and interrogatory signatures

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in