Motion for Refund of Appellate Filing Fee; Proposed Order
Public Court Documents
January 12, 1990
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, LULAC and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General of Texas Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Motion for Refund of Appellate Filing Fee; Proposed Order, 1990. d9a6ec3a-247c-f011-b4cc-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e34fdc7d-8e94-4375-a307-3e8ff29a147f/motion-for-refund-of-appellate-filing-fee-proposed-order. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
Tie ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF TEXAS
JIM MATTOX January 12, 1990
ATTORNEY GENERAL
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
U.S. District Clerk
200 East Wall, Room 316
Federal Building
Midland, Texas 79701
Re: LULAC #4434, et al. v. Mattox, et al.,
Civil Action No. MO-88-CA-154
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced cause are the original
and one copy of a Motion for Refund of Appellate Filing Fee, along with
a proposed Order. Also, pursuant to the Clerk's direction, there is a
check enclosed for $105.00 made payable to the Clerk for filing fees.
Special Assistant Attorney General
P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711-2548
(512) 463-2085
CC; Counsel of Record
S12/468 = 2100 SUPREME COURT BUILDING AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2348
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND /ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC COUNCIL #4434, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No.
MO-88-CA-154
VS.
JIM MATTOX, et al.,
Defendants. on
Wo
n
Ao
n
Co
N
Ao
n
Lo
n
Un
MOTION FOR REFUND OF APPELLATE FILING FEE
The State Defendants hereby move the Court for a refund of the
filing fee which the Clerk of this Court compelled them to pay in
connection with their Notice of Appeal filed on January 12, 1990. The
grounds follow:
1, On January 11, 1990, the State Defendants filed a Notice
of Appeal. Accompanying it was a check made payable to the Clerk for
$105.00 for filing fees associated with the appeal.
2. Also on January 11, 1990, the Court disposed of a Motion
to Alter the Order of January 2, 1990, which had been characterized
as a Rule 59(e) motion when it was filed.
3. On January 12, 1990, the State Defendants filed a new
Notice of Appeal. It added the Court's Order of December 11, 1990,
to the orders being appealed. No new filing fee accompanied the
January 12th Notice of Appeal.
4. On January 12th, the Clerk's office contacted counsel for
the State Defendants by telephone and directed them to forward
another $105.00 filing fee. In the telephone conversation, counsel
called to the Clerk's attention the provision of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure which, in his view, made the filing of new fee in
connection with the appeal both unnecessary and inappropriate. The
Clerk indicated that State Defendants nonetheless must pay the fee for
the January 12th fee. Through a second check made payable to the
Clerk and submitted to the Clerk on January 15, 1990, counsel for the
State Defendants has complied with the Clerk's direction.
5. The Clerk is clearly in error in requiring the second filing
fee associated with the January 12th Notice of Appeal. The fee
accompanying the January 11th Notice of Appeal sufficed to cover the
January 12th notice, too.
Rule 4(a)(4) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure could
not be clearer on this point. It provides in the last sentence: "No
additional fees shall be required for [the second] filing." Not only is
there no statutory basis for the Clerk's requirement of a second fee;
such a requirement is explicitly forbidden by the applicable rule.
Based upon the foregoing, the State Defendants request the
Court to grant this motion.
Respectfully submitted,
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARY F. KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General :
Spogial Assistant Attorney General
er : / Wi — y 2 7
dl / / ’ “Sf Nis lear suri
JAVIER GUAJARDO - ~
~ Assistant Attorney General
P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711-2548
(512) 463-2085
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this 12th day of January, 1990, I sent a copy of
the foregoing document by first class U.S. mail to each of the following:
William L. Garrett, Garrett, Thompson & Chang, 8300 Douglas, Suite
800, Dallas, Texas 75225; Rolando Rios, Southwest Voter Registration
& Education Project, 201 N. St. Mary's, Suite 521, San Antonio, Texas
78205; Sherrilyn A. Ifill, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund,
Inc., 99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor, New York, New York 10013;
Gabrielle K. McDonald, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 2050, Austin,
Texas 78701; Edward B. Cloutman, III, Mullinax, Wells, Baab &
Cloutman, P.C., 3301 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas 75226-1637; J. Eugene
Clements, Porter & Clements, 700 Louisiana, Suite 3500, Houston,
Texas 77002-2730; Robert H. Mow, Jr., Hughes & Luce, 2800
Momentum Place, 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201; and John L.
Hill, Jr. Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, 3300 Texas Commerce
Tower, Houston, Texas 77002. _———_
/
{ ae Yoh
\ : \ # 2 :
Reétéa Hicks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MIDLAND /ODESSA DIVISION
LULAC COUNCIL #4434, et al., 5
Plaintiffs, 8
§
VS. § Civil Action No.
8 MO-88-CA-154
JIM MATTOX, et al., §
Defendants. §
ORDER
On this day came before the Court the State Defendants’ Motion
for Refund of Appellate Filing Fee. The motion is well-taken and,
therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court
is directed to rebate to the State of Texas the $105.00 filing fee paid
in connection with the Notice of Appeal filed on January 12, 1990.
SIGNED and ENTERED this ___ day of January, 1990.
LUCIUS D. BUNTON
Chief Judge