Next Friend Group Notes
Working File
1990

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Next Friend Group Notes, 1990. 1954c6b6-aa46-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e5146e7b-f1b3-4946-a485-de5cba115b23/next-friend-group-notes. Accessed October 19, 2025.
Copied!
NEXT FRIEND GROUF A next friend group or advisory council group will be established in the following manner for the following purposes: I. COMPOSITION A. Number- 25 B. Criteria for choice a. Commitment to interdistrict remedy b. Representative of racial, ethnic, geographic diversity of plaintiffs c. Respected by community , plaintiffs, plaintiffs” attorneys C. Representation from the following groups: 1. Religious leaders - Tom Hoyt suburban—- Rev. Bean, Bill Watson, Peggy Quinn 2. Presidents of PTO- Hartford 3. Prinicipals—- Hartford Richie Montanez, James Thompson, Amato Cruz 4. Leaders of community organizations Ester Bush Eddie Perez, Juan Brito, Candida Flores 5. Leaders of Educational organizations, institutions -black teachers” union Pat Tallman, Gwen Andrews - CREC -university Julio Morales, Conrad Mallet, Fred Simons 6. Political/government leaders Thelma Dickerson Frances Sanchez 7. Business Wick Sloane 7? 8. Family and children organizations 9. Housing—- Denise Viera 10. Hartford school system ie ri = fu el le fo ge ed Ana Maria Garcia 11. Other- Hernan LalFontaine 3 Qe ay George Schatzki A. Act in advisory role to p la intiffs regarding remedy B. Be available when necessary to speak about the lawsuit C. Run interference with state dept. of ed. officials D. Lend credibility to lawsuit and remedy E. Furnish information relating to discovery F. Provide anecdotes for liability issues G. Broaden the network reached