Motion for Hearing on Plans for Desegregation of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Schools
Public Court Documents
February 4, 1970
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Motion for Hearing on Plans for Desegregation of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Schools, 1970. 34fc781f-2e34-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e52160fb-b66b-4c6c-a812-970ecc574989/motion-for-hearing-on-plans-for-desegregation-of-charlotte-mecklenburg-public-schools. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||ea527267-f002-4f80-a327-e6cc26430e7e||] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
JAMES E. SWANN, et al,
Plaintiffs,
VS. Civil Action No. 1974
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF
EDUCATION et al,
N
e
?
Na
Na
e?
Na
Ns
?
a
?
as
?
ac
s
a
?
a
t
Defendants.
MOTION FOR HEARING ON PLANS FOR DESEGREGATION OF CHARLOTTE-
MECKLENBURG PUBLIC. SCHOOLS
The Defendants, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education and the
individual Board members, respectfully move the Court that:
1. Before issuing any ardes in response to the Plaintiffs' "Motion for
Immediate Desegregation of the Public Schools in Charlotte and Mecklenburg
County" (dated January 19, 1970) a hearing be held at a time to be fixed by
the Court regarding the "Plan for Desegregation of Schools" filed by the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education on February 2, 1970, and the Plan
filed or to be filed by Dr. John A. Finger, Jr. in response to the December 1,
1969 Order of the Court.
2. At said hearing the Pefendants be heard and permitted to introduce
evidence relating to the "Board Plan" and the "Finger Plan" and the implement-
ation of these Plans.
3. Dr. John A. Finger, Jr. be present at said Yearing and available
for examination by the Defendants regarding each of the aboverrenitonsd Plans.
4. In the alternative, if said hearing is not held as requested in this
Motion, the Defendants be permitted to tender pertinent evidence regarding the
two Plans and related matters.
5 od : é
In support of this Motion the Defendants show the Court that the hearing
and evidence referred to herein is necessary for a full explanation and evalu-
ation of each of the two Plans and with reference to the implementation
requested in the above-mentioned Motion heretofore filed by the Plaintiffs.
WHEREFORE, the Defendants respectfully pray the Court that it grant
the request of the Defendants as set forth in the foregoing Motion.
This 4 day of February, 1970.
so Abags, >. oa gama.
William J. Waggoner
Weinstein, Waggoner, Sl Odom & Bigger
1100 Barringer Office Tower ;
Charlotte, North Carolina
ani 2 Sie
Benj. S. H{rack
Ervin, Horack & McCartha
400 Attorneys Building
Charlotte, North Carolina
!
{
{
|
|
Brock oe.
| Law Building
f Jo ' Charlotte, North Carolina
Attorneys for Defendant, Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Board of Education : ;
a
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that copies of the foregoing Motion
were served upon counsel for Plaintiffs by depositing copies of same in the
United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to:
Conrad O. Pearson
203 1/2 East Chapel Hill Street
Durham, North Carolina
Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning
216 West Tenth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Jack Greenberg
James M. Nabrit, III
Norman Chachkin
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York
This 4 day of February, 1970.
WAM wD WD boymun
William J. Waggoner
Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges, Odom & Bigger
1100 Barringer Office Tower:
Charlotte, North Carolina
Roce Ne)
Benj. S. Norack
Ervin, Horack & McCartha
400 Attorneys Building
Charlotte, North Carolina
Vamd BO
Brock Barkley . \
Law Building
Charlotte, North Carolina
Attorneys for Defendant, Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Board of Education [||ea527267-f002-4f80-a327-e6cc26430e7e||]