Order

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1c7287bc-e192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Order, 1986. 1c7287bc-e192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e7ef70ed-52f5-4234-9525-45977ab84515/order. Accessed May 13, 2025.

Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

RALEIGH DIVISION

JUt{ I8S
J. RICH LEONARD, CLERK

No. 8r-Bo r,,.[Effiiit: 3lH*
ORDER

--_fJLED
RATPB GINGLES, €t aI.,

Plaintiffs

vs.

RUFUS EDII{ISTEN, €t dI.,

Defendants

By order dated December 5, L985, this court granted plaintiffs'
motion for an order establishing a pernanent method of election

to the North Carolina House of Representatives in House Districts
8, 70, 7L and 72 which are situated in Wilson, Edgecombe and Nash

Counties and enjoined the defendants to continue to use those

election districts as outlined in the courtrs October 30, 1984

order in connection with all elections to be held in those counties

pending the appeal of this action. Plaintiff-intervenors have

now filed a motion requesting the court to modify the Decenber

5 order by eliminating the "pending appeal" qualification with

respect to those districts and by also ordering a permanent method

of election in North Carolina Senate District 2.L As grounds

for this motion, plaintiff-intervenors assert that none of these

districts are involved in the appeal presently pending in the

Supreme Court, and that permanent relief is therefore appropriate.

1. Senate District 2 is composed of Northampton
and Hertford Counties and Portions of Gates, Bertie,
ltartin, Edgecombe, Halifax, Vance and Warren Counties.
N.C.c.S. S 120-1 (a) .



In response, the defendants state that they do not oppose the

motionr so long as any order on permanent relief takes into account

the fact that reapportionnent may be necessary following the 1990

census.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendants are permanently

enjoined to use the House and Senate election districts discussed

herein subject to reapportionment following the 1990 eensus.

UNITED STATES

EA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU

Itlay 30, 1986.

l-certify the foregoing to be e tnre

and correct coPY ol 16s 6riginal'

J. Rich Leonard, Clerk

United States Dlstrici ictrt
Eastern Drstrict d Nor$r Garolina

*l$-fqslu}(-
Dctrliu fl'

/
F. T. DUPREE,
UNITED STATES

Page 2

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in