Stipulation of Fact
Public Court Documents
November 1, 1984
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Stipulation of Fact, 1984. 4b2a12ca-c803-ef11-a1fd-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e914ab2c-4834-4df9-abdc-985131b66048/stipulation-of-fact. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BARBARA MAJOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No .32-11902
Section (
DAVID. CC. TREEN, etc., et a}.
Defendants.
STIPULATION OF FACT
Plaintiffs and defendants, through their undersigned counsel
hereby enter into the following stipulation of facts. This
agreed stipulation of facts is entered into solely for the
purposes of this litigation to conserve the resources of the
parties and the Court. The parties hereto stipulate as follows:
1. Both sides could present credible testimony that a
non-contingent hourly rate for an attorney with the experience
and reputation of Mr.Stan Halpin, handling litigation of similar
complexity and novelty as the present, would range from $100 to
$175 per hour in New Orleans, Louisiana.
2. Both sides could present credible testimony that a
non-contingent hourly rate for an attorney with the experience
and reputation of Ms.Lani Guinier, handling litigation of similar
complexity and novelty as the present, would range from $100 to
$175 per hour in New York City.
3. Both sides could present credible testimony that a
non-contingent hourly rate for an attorney with the experience
and reputation of Mr.James Kellogg, Steven Scheckman, and William
Quigley, handling litigation of similar complexity and novelty as
the present, would range from $75 to $150 per hour in New
Orleans, Louisiana.
4. Both sides could present credible testimony that 2a
non-contingent hourly rate for an attorney with the experience
and reputation of Mr.Armand Derfner, handling litigation of
similar complexity and novelty as the present, would range from
$100 to $220 per hour in Washington, D.C.
5. The parties agree that credible evidence could be
presented which would show that customary legal fees for
attorneys handling cases on a contingent basis in New Orleans,
Louisiana, provide that an attorney for a prevailing plaintiff
should recover from 33% to 50% of the plaintiffs' judgment. The
higher percentage traditionally reflects the increased risk and
complexity of the litigation.
Respectfully submitted this day of November, 1984,
BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, P.A.
405 Van Antwerp Bldg.
P. 0. Box 1051
Mobile, Alabama 36633
(205) 433-2000
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
234 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
(504) 568-5575
BY:
PATRICIA BOWERS
Attorney for Defendants