LDF Asks Halt of Evictions for Illegitimate Pregnancy by Alabama Housing Authorities
Press Release
February 11, 1967
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. LDF Asks Halt of Evictions for Illegitimate Pregnancy by Alabama Housing Authorities, 1967. c2dd6f93-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ea19bfc1-80c2-4cfb-89c2-33fd711e4d9d/ldf-asks-halt-of-evictions-for-illegitimate-pregnancy-by-alabama-housing-authorities. Accessed January 08, 2026.
Copied!
ww
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel
egal efense und Jack Greenberg
Director, Public ions
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. jane
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUd: 6-8397 see ae ‘olumbus Circle, New York, N.Y. ison 6- FOR RELEASE po SIGHTJNUMBER 212-749-8487
SATURDAY
February 11, 1967
LDF ASKS HALT OF EVICTIONS
FOR ILLEGITIMATE PREGNANCY
BY ALA.HOUSING AUTHORITIES
BIRMINGHAM-~-The U.S. District Court here was asked yesterday to halt
eviction of two Negro women and their families from public housing in
Talladega, Alabama because of the pending birth of illegitimate childrer.
Mrs, Everline Lewis and her children were ordered out of the Knox-
ville Homes because Mrs. Lewis' daughter, who does not reside with her,
is expecting an illegitimate child.
Another tenant of the same public housing development, Mrs,Margaze
Truss, has been ordered evicted because she is expecting an illegitmate
child.
Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
(LDF) filed motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary
injunction o' grounds that both women, and the class they represent,
were denied:
* proper and sufficient notice
* adequate and reasonable grounds
* a fair hearing on the charges.
LDF lawyers argue that eviction of the families would violate the
"basic purpose of all publicly supported low-income housing as set
forth in the policy provisions of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937,"
That act, the attorneys assert, seeks to "remedy the unsafe and
unsanitary housing conditions and the acute shortage of decent, safe
and sanitary dwellings for low-income" families.
LDF attorneys added that "the Talladega policy does not help
eliminate the problems attendant to slum dwellings: it creates them,
"It deprives low-income people of desperately needed housing by
its exclusionist policy.
"Depriving children of a decent home to live in neither serves to
curb the rate of illegitimacy nor to benefit other tenants in the
project," the attorneys said.
In conclusion, the Court was told that "due process requires that
plaintiffs be given some opportunity to be heard.
"Hearings are an important protection from arbitrariness.
“Tenants should have the right to have decisions on such issues
based on evidence and not on rumor or fancy.
"For the indigent, eviction is a serious penalty," the lawyers sail
-30-