Memo from Lani Guinier to Clyde RE: Tallahassee Branch of NAACP v. Leon County
Correspondence
March 26, 1984
1 page
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Memo from Lani Guinier to Clyde RE: Tallahassee Branch of NAACP v. Leon County, 1984. f9d33625-e692-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ea49b6c1-c089-4b2c-8e2d-75047b03472e/memo-from-lani-guinier-to-clyde-re-tallahassee-branch-of-naacp-v-leon-county. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
I/1"^o /*^
o
Lanl Gulnler
March 26, L984
C1yde,
I have reviewed this reguest for
assistane. f an inclined against
o:r parlicipation at tJlis stage for
serreraJ- reasons. First, our budget-
arlz sitr:ation does not make it easy
to assure rrDre reslDnsilcilities.
Seond, ttrey are seeking a oonsid-
erable anount of financial support.
Third, f rrould prefer to get in-
rrclned rigtrt no,s in novel 52 cases :
suctr as those drallenging registna-
tion practies or seond prirmries.
Finally, rrnless )u: or sqreone else
on staff wants to get inrrcIved in
t].is caserr,e rould sirrply be bank-
rclU-ng loca1 ounsel.
ft looks lile an excellent case,
trcr^rever, and if we ould convince
sorreone on staff (sudr as penda)
rfto is loking for a winnable case
for a drange to get inrrclrved, I
rculd reonsider ntrr orttrer objections.
9trat are your ttrougfits?
Q,rylx
Ifi/r
Attach
k: Tallatrassee Branctr of
UAICP v. Leon 6unty,
!b. 83-7480