Correspondence from Lani Guinier to David T. McLaughlin (Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies)
Correspondence
July 6, 1988

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Grace Richardson to Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1988. e6238f93-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/22d8dc2e-73e8-45c3-b885-858ecc1d82f2/correspondence-from-grace-richardson-to-richard-engstrom-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed April 17, 2025.
Copied!
L*'rE&renseH. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, ]NC. 99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10013 o (212121$'1900 May 13, 1988 Professor Richard Engstron Department of PoIitical Science University of New Orleans New Orleanr, Louisiana 70148 Dear Professor Engstrom: Re: Whitfield v. Clinton Enclosed is Toni c. Williams's check for the tlping she performred in the above -case. sorry for the deray but it wtas caused by a misunderstanding of how the bill was to be allocated. Enclosure #f Cotutribaiotue on dtdutible lor U.S. ituoru tox ptnpsea. Thc I{AACP Lc0at Dctonse & Edrrcational Fund, lnc. (LoR is not part ol the llatioflal Assoclation lor fic Mvarccmcnt ol Colored hople (llAACP) although LDFwasloundid bythe NMCPand slures itscommitmcnltooqualrights. LDFhashad torowr$ycarsascparatc Board, program,shtl,ofiiccand bndCat.