Letter to Court from Carraway RE: Copies of the first page of defendants' exhibit 435

Correspondence
December 3, 1999

Cite this item

Letter to Court from Carraway RE: Copies of the first page of defendants' exhibit 435 preview

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4d88e61a-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Court from Carraway RE: Copies of the first page of defendants' exhibit 435, 1999. 4d88e61a-e10e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ed279c62-5bd2-49bf-a76f-f068dfd3d229/letter-to-court-from-carraway-re-copies-of-the-first-page-of-defendants-exhibit-435. Accessed November 19, 2025.

Copied!

    State of North Carolina 

MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 5 P. O. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Frances S. Carraway, CLAS 
RALEIGH Special Litigation 

— 5 (919) 716-6900 2 2.062 270020620 FAX: (919) 716-6763 

December 3, 1999 

Jolie Skinner 

Office of the Clerk 

US District Court. Eastern District of 

North Carolina 

310 New Bern Ave. 

P. O. Box 25670 

Raleigh, NC 27611 

Re: Cromartie v. Hunt, No. 4:96-CV-104-BO(3) 

Dear Jolie: 

Enclosed please tind copies of the first page of Defendants’ Exhibit 435. That page has been 

altered to reflect the notes of Dr. David Peterson, made during his testimony on Wednesday, 

December 1. The copies are being provided in accordance with the direction given by the court at the 

close of Dr. Peterson’s testimony. A copy for the court record and for each judge is included herein. 

Copies are also being provided to all counsel. 

Sincerely, 

ance JS Carian 
Frances S. Carraway, CLAS 

CC} Robinson Everett 

Adam Stein 

v Todd Cox 

 



        

Summary of All Six Counties — From Tables 6a through 6&f 

  

  

Tal. 1 9% clack Population v. % Registered Democrats 

  
  

  

  

  

    
  

    
  

  

  

  

  
  

    

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

    

  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

    
  

  
  

  

    

% Dem -> 

<30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% > 70% Total 
0.00% £410.26% ~11.65% 21.58% 40.00% 100.00%]| 19.52% 

< 30% 0/6 4/39 12/103\ 30/139 pe 1/1] 65/333 

% 50.00% 83.89% 66.67%| 76.47% 
Blk 30 - 40% 1/2 88 SD 4m.l 1317 

50.00% 5108.00%| 72.73% 
V 40-50% 3/6 5/15 8/11 

100.00% 100.00%/| 100.00% 
50 - 60% 22 8/8 10/10 

100.00% | 100.00% 

60 - 70% 9/9 9/9 

100.00% 100.00% | 100.00% 
> 70% 11 48/48 49/49 

0.00% 10.26% 11.65% 21.98% 50.78% 97.40%| 35.80% 
Total | 0/6 4/39 12/103 ' 31/141 32/63 75/77] 154/429 

Table 63.2 % Elack Population v. % Voted Dem in 1220 Senate Eiection 

% Dem —> 

<30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% > 70% Total 

16.36% 19.58% 16.83% 23.21% 25.00% 50.00% 19.52% 
< 30% 10/61 19/97 17/101 13/58 3/12 3/61 65/333 

% 66.67% 75.00% 100.00% 0.00%| 76.47% 
Blk 30-40% 2/3 6.8 8/5 oN 13/17 

| 0.00% 100.00% 0.C0% 80.00%] 72.73% 
V 40-50% 0/1 4/4 0/1 4/5 8/11 

100.00% 100.00% 100.00%] 100.00% 
£0 - 60% 1/1 4/4 5/81 10/10 

10.00%] 10.00% 
60 - 70% 9/9 S/9 

100.00% 1C0.00%| 100.00% 
> 70% 1/1 48/48 49/49 

16.36% 20.41% 18.10% 34.78% 54.53% 93.24% 35.90% 
Total | 10/61 20/8 16/105 24/63 12/22 68/74 | 154/429 

Table 69.3 % Black Population v. % Voted Dem in 188 Court Election 

% Dem —> 

<30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% > 70% Total 

6.41% 15.00% 27.55% 47.84% @ 33.33% 19.52% 
< 30% £773 18/120 27/88 13/31 2/6 65/333 

% 100.00% 100.00% 77.78% 60.00% 76.47% 
Blk 30-40% 1/1 2/2 7/9 3/5 13/17 

| 0.00% 66.67% 85.71% 72.73% 
V 40-50% 0/1 2/3 6/7 8/11 

100.00% 100.00% 100.00%| 100.00% 
50 - 60% 4/4 313 3/3 10/10 

100.00% 100.00%| 100.00% 
60 - 70% 1/1 8/8 9/9 

100.00% 100.00% 100.00%| 100.00% 
> 70% 1/1 2/2 46/46 49/49 

6.41% 16.26% 29.00% 55.32% 70.83% 100.00% 33.57% 
Total 5/78 20/123 29/100 26/47 17/24 S7/57| 144/429       

  

Table 6g.4 % Black Population v. % Voted Dem in 1988 Lt Governor Election 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

% Dem —> : 

<30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% > 70% Total 
22.73% 8.87% 22.31% 40.00% 16.67% 19.52% 

< 30% 5/22 A124" 29130 18/45 2/12 65/333 
% 100.00% 77.78% 80.00%  0.00%| 76.47% 
Blk _30-40% 2/2 7/9 4/5 0/1 13/17 

| 0.00% 66.67% 80.00% 100.00%| 72.73% 
V 40-50% 0/1 2/3 4/5 2/2 8/11 

100.00% 100.00% 100.00% | 100.00% 
50 - 60% 3/3 6/6 1/1 10/10 

: 100.00% 100.00% | 100.00% 
60 - 70% 111 8/8 9/9 

100.00% 100.00% 100.00%| 100.00% 
> 70% 1/1 1/1 47/47 49/49 

26.08% 8.87% 23.31% 50.00% 60.00% 98.31%| 35.90% 
Total 6/23 11/124 31/133 30/60 13/30 58/59 154/429           

  

REANIM ARO ANTE FT OSA iis CE 77,

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Letter to Court from Carraway RE: Copies of the first page of defendants' exhibit 435

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in