Circuit Retaxation Costs Order

Public Court Documents
December 20, 1974

Circuit Retaxation Costs Order preview

3 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Circuit Retaxation Costs Order, 1974. 34f90e51-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ed4f55c6-5232-445b-a281-964ed3c979e2/circuit-retaxation-costs-order. Accessed April 04, 2025.

    Copied!

    Nos. 72-1809-14

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

RONALD BRADLEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, Governor 
of Michigan, etc.; Board of 
EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF 
DETROIT,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS 
LOCAL 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION 
OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO,

Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee,

and

ALLEN PARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al.,
\

Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants,

and

KERRY GREEN et al.,

Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees.

)
)
)
)
))
>
>
)
)
)
>
>
)
)
>
>
>
)
)
>
>
)
>
>
)
>
)
)
)
>
>

JTL 1 I L  fc . 't J  .

DEC 2 01974

JOHN P, HEHMAN, Clerk

ORDER

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and WEICK, EDWARDS, 

CELEBREZZE, PECK, McCREE, MILLER, LIVELY and ENGEL, Circuit

Judges.



Nos. 72-1809-14 - 2

In the decision of this court, reported at 

484 F.2d 215 (1973), it was ORDERED that no costs be taxed 

and that each party bear his own costs in the Court of 

Appeals.

The Supreme Court reversed the decision of 

this court in certain particulars in an opinion reported at 

42 U.S.L.W. 5249 (July 25, 1974) and remanded the causes to 

this court for further proceedings in conformity with the
o

opinion of the Supreme Court. This court has remanded the 

causes to the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Michigan for further proceedings in conformity 

with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court taxed costs in that court 

against Ronald Bradley and Richard Bradley, by mother and 

next friend, Verde Bradley, in the sum of $20,329.60.

Motions have been filed in this court for re­

taxation of costs in the Court of Appeals. This court con­

strues the decision of the Supreme Court to reverse the 
this

decision of/court in certain particulars but that the Supreme 

Court did not reverse the decision of this court with respect



Nos. 72-1809-14 - 3

to the taxation of costs in the Court of Appeals. This 

remains a question for determination by the Court of Appeals.

Upon consideration of the various motions and 

the responses thereto, it is ORDERED that all motions for 

retaxation of costs be and hereby are overruled, It is 

further ORDERED that no costs are taxed in the Court of 

Appeals and that each party will bear his own costs in this 

court.

Entered by order of the court.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top