Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
Public Court Documents
June 21, 1991

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Exceed Page Limitation, 1991. fb60b973-5c40-f011-b4cb-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/edb940e1-65f3-4a11-b4a8-588b283a7855/plaintiffs-ex-parte-motion-to-exceed-page-limitation. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
JOEL R. REYNOLDS y JACQUELINE WARN » 7 [M , |NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL £35: 617 S. Olive Street, Suite 1210 3 || Los Angeles, CA 90014 (213) 892-1500 JANE PERKINS NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM 2639 S. La Cienega Blvd. 6 Los Angeles, CA 90034 (213) 204-6010 SUSAN SPELLETICH KIM CARD LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY 9 1440 Broadway, Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94612 (415) 451-9261 BILL LANN LEE KEVIN S. REED 12 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 315 W. 9th Street, Suite 208 Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213) 624-2405 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 (Additional counsel on following page) Se UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 lERIKA MATTHEWS, et al., ) Civ. No. C-90-3620 EFL ) Plaintiffs, ) CLASS ACTION ) 191 us. ) PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE 35 ) ~~ MOTION TO EXCEED KENNETH KIZER, ) PAGE LIMITATION ) 21 Defendant. ) 22 ) ) Date: June 21, 1991 23 ) Time: 10:00 a.m. ) 24 25 26 27 MARK D. ROSENBAI ACLU FOUNDATIO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 633 South Shatto Place Los Angeles, CA 90005 (213) 487-1720 EDWARD M. CHEN ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1663 Mission Street, Suite 460 San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 621-2493 Plaintiffs, Erika Matthews, et. al, by their undersigned counsel, hereby move for leave of court to rile a Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Defendant Kenneth Kaiser that is in excess of the fifteen page limit prescribed by the Special Notice Regarding Motions. See Special Notice Regarding Motions Contatined in Order Setting Status Conferfence By Richard W. Wieking, Clerk (December 20, 1990). Plaintiffs ask that they be allowed to file a memorandum that is no longer than 20 pages in length, and as grounds therefore, state: 1. The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is a dispositive motion that involves review of extensive legislative and administrative material. 2. This motion for Partial Summary Judgment involves important issues that should be thoroughly presented since they affect large numbers of people. 3. The Attorney General’s Office has authorized undersigned counsel to state that it has acknowledged the seriousness of the issues presented by this case and "clearly" has no objection to this motion. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Erika Matthews, et. al., hereby request that the Court grant their motion to file a Memorandum In // // // }/ // // 1 Support of a Mgtion for Summary Judgment that is no longer than 20 5 [Pages in lengtn. 4 Dated: May 23, 1591 Respectfully submitted, 5 Natural Resources Defense Council National Health Law Program 6 ACLU Foundation of Southern California NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund ” Legal Aid Society of Alameda County ACLU Foundation of Northern California 9 By: Chel ol i féne Perkins 10 ' Attorneys for Plaintiffs