Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
Public Court Documents
June 21, 1991
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Exceed Page Limitation, 1991. fb60b973-5c40-f011-b4cb-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/edb940e1-65f3-4a11-b4a8-588b283a7855/plaintiffs-ex-parte-motion-to-exceed-page-limitation. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
JOEL R. REYNOLDS
y
JACQUELINE WARN » 7 [M
, |NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL £35:
617 S. Olive Street, Suite 1210
3 || Los Angeles, CA 90014
(213) 892-1500
JANE PERKINS
NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM
2639 S. La Cienega Blvd.
6 Los Angeles, CA 90034
(213) 204-6010
SUSAN SPELLETICH
KIM CARD
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
9 1440 Broadway, Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94612
(415) 451-9261
BILL LANN LEE
KEVIN S. REED
12 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
315 W. 9th Street, Suite 208
Los Angeles, CA 90015
(213) 624-2405
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
15 (Additional counsel on following page)
Se UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17 lERIKA MATTHEWS, et al., ) Civ. No. C-90-3620 EFL
)
Plaintiffs, ) CLASS ACTION
)
191 us. ) PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE
35 ) ~~ MOTION TO EXCEED
KENNETH KIZER, ) PAGE LIMITATION
)
21 Defendant. )
22 )
) Date: June 21, 1991
23 ) Time: 10:00 a.m.
)
24
25
26
27
MARK D. ROSENBAI
ACLU FOUNDATIO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
633 South Shatto Place
Los Angeles, CA 90005
(213) 487-1720
EDWARD M. CHEN
ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
1663 Mission Street, Suite 460
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 621-2493
Plaintiffs, Erika Matthews, et. al, by their undersigned
counsel, hereby move for leave of court to rile a Memorandum in
Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against
Defendant Kenneth Kaiser that is in excess of the fifteen page
limit prescribed by the Special Notice Regarding Motions. See
Special Notice Regarding Motions Contatined in Order Setting Status
Conferfence By Richard W. Wieking, Clerk (December 20, 1990).
Plaintiffs ask that they be allowed to file a memorandum that is no
longer than 20 pages in length, and as grounds therefore, state:
1. The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is a
dispositive motion that involves review of extensive legislative
and administrative material.
2. This motion for Partial Summary Judgment involves
important issues that should be thoroughly presented since they
affect large numbers of people.
3. The Attorney General’s Office has authorized
undersigned counsel to state that it has acknowledged the
seriousness of the issues presented by this case and "clearly" has
no objection to this motion.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Erika Matthews, et. al., hereby
request that the Court grant their motion to file a Memorandum In
//
//
//
}/
//
//
1 Support of a Mgtion for Summary Judgment that is no longer than 20
5 [Pages in lengtn.
4 Dated: May 23, 1591 Respectfully submitted,
5 Natural Resources Defense Council
National Health Law Program
6 ACLU Foundation of Southern California
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
” Legal Aid Society of Alameda County
ACLU Foundation of Northern California
9 By: Chel ol i
féne Perkins
10 ' Attorneys for Plaintiffs