Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas
Correspondence
May 9, 1985
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas, 1985. 02caf321-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ef7b4378-6528-4d25-8be6-b387ebccb613/correspondence-from-guinier-to-stevas. Accessed December 06, 2025.
Copied!
May 9, 1985
the Honorable Alexander L. Stevas
CIerk
Supreme Court of the United States
wainington, D. c.20543
Re: 83-1968 - Rufus L- Edmisten, et al' v'
Ralph Ginqles, et aI-
Dear Mr. Stevas:
I am counsel of record for appellees in the above
".piio.r"d
case in which probable jurisdiction was
noled, April 29, 1985. Pursuant to our conversa-
tion of itray 3 , 1985, I write to alert you to a
potential |roblem I have regarding the briefing
'schedule dlscribed in the Memorandum to Counsel in
Ci=." Granted Review on April 29, 1985. The brief
for appellents is now due June 13, 1985. Accordingly,
the brief for appellees will be due in mid-JulY, 1985.
As I stated during our conversation, I am also lead
counse] for one oi three co-defendants in a crimi'naI
j;t case that is set for trial June 17, I98s I9!i!Sq
6tat,es v. sp?lcgf -Bgqug,-Jr., et al', cr' No' 8500014
and Cr. No. he trial is sched-
uled to last four weeks, during the same period in
which I would be preparing the brief for appellees.
I thought it prudent to bring this apEarent conflict
to youi attent,ion early on. Counsel for appellants
havi stated they do not object to my seeking an ex-
tension of time within which to file my brief'
Thank you for your consideration and assistance.
Respectful111 Yourtl
Oil,&,^*A*
Carol Lani Guinier
cl,G/ r
cc: Jerris Leonard, Esq.
James Wa11ace, Esq-
\iXJ:TY NiNE FlUDSON STREE]- NE\l/'iCFK. )r Y 1C013