Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Larry T. Menefee; Dillard v. Crenshaw County Affidavit of Pamela Karlan and Appendix of Working Hours
Correspondence
July 11, 1988
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Larry T. Menefee; Dillard v. Crenshaw County Affidavit of Pamela Karlan and Appendix of Working Hours, 1988. f2685e18-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f00862ca-65cc-4848-a940-08f9c7371748/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-larry-t-menefee-dillard-v-crenshaw-county-affidavit-of-pamela-karlan-and-appendix-of-working-hours. Accessed June 01, 2025.
Copied!
ED*n'eH.
Larry T. Menefee
5th Floor, Title Building
300 21st Street, North
Bimingham, Alabama 35203
Re: Dillard v. Crenshaw Countv (Subclass B)
Dear lrarry:
Here,s my supplemental affidavit for the
I came in pretty much at what we estimated.
I'm also sending you a copy of the review
Peyton and I did. Sonething steamy for those
in Belize.
I shall be moving to Charlottesville next week. My addressthere is Univer_s_ity of Virginia School of Law, Charlot-tesviffe,vA 22901-. My office phone number wirl be (Bo4) 924-7g].o.
SiffiErely,
\1,,.
Patrela S. Karlan
enclosures (21
Conrribtdiots on dcdtdibh lor U.S ircome tor ptupue"
T:lr. ilAACP L.Cal Dclcn$ & Edrntional Fund, lrr. (LoD ls not parl ot ttu tlrtoml tusoclttion tor thc Mvarccmcnt ot Colond hoplc (ilMCD amouoh
LIlf wrglouilrcdbytlrllMCPand Curusibcommltmcntto{ualrlehb. IDFhr3Mdto]oltrOylars e tparat! Bo8rd, program, stiff, otliccand budget.
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10013 o (212) 21$1900
JuIy 11, 1988
B fee application.
of Abby Thernstrom
steamy beach days
IN THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
T:_T: _I13:- _ :r :TIT_::_13:Y_*
JOHN DTLIARD, EtaL_,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CRENSHAW COt NTy, ALABAI{Ar g!_BL_r
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)
crTy oF NEw YoRK )
PAIITEI,A S. KARI"AN,
1. I am one of
C.A. No. 85-T-1332-N
AFFIDAVTT
SS:
being duly Eirrorn, deposes and says:
the attorneys for the plaintiffs in this
case.
2. I submit this affidavit as a supplement to my affidavit
of April 5, 1988. That affidavit, which set out my background
and hourly rate, included time spent up to and including March
31, 1988. Attached as Appendix A to this affidavit is a
schedule of the hours which I have spent on this case in
connection with litigation against subclass B after that time.
These hours were compiled from contemporaneous time records which
I have maintained throughout this pegi.od,
A,,],5
Subscribed
before me
1988.
to and sworn to
this 1ffiay of July
c,
Qualltied ln Westchestpr CoPtIL
Gommission Explree +1-2r lSls
Pame1a S. Karlan
Date
4/os/88
4/o5/s8
4/07 /e8
4/08/88
4/LL/88
4/L2/88
4/L3/88
4/L4/88
4/Ls/88
4/L8/88
4/Le/88
4/20/88
4/2L/88
4/22/88
4/25/88
4/26/88
4/27 /88
s/2/88
APPENDIX A
Description
completed fees affidavit; correspondence
from court and from LTM
reviewed correspondence and opinions from
court/magistrate
reviewed transcript of Feb. hearing and
prepared outline for lirnited vote brief
completed reading transcript of Feb. hearing
and read scholarly articles on linited vote
read opinion from court in Baldwin County;
discussion with cocounsel; reviewed corres-
pondence and pleadings
worked on limited vote brief ; corespondence
work on linited vote brief
work on limited vote brief
correspondence
work on limited vote brief (9.O); reviewed
correspondence and orders (.A); tel conv.
with LTM (.3)
finished draft of linited vote brief and
sent to cocounsel
te1 conv with LTI{, ES, and Dick Engstrom
re draft of brief; revisions
finished briefi supervised production and
serrrice
Hours
1.5
o.4
4.0
3.0
2.O
L.7
2.8
3.0
0.3
9.7
6.5
2.4
5.3
0.1
0.3
replaced mat'ls and reviewed correspondence 0.4
reviewed fees motion (.2) i correspondence 0.5
(.1); conv. with LG re reply brief (.21
reviewed Baldwin objection; discussed 0.5
Washington BOE and fees with JUB; corres-
pondence
reviewed correspondence
reviewed orders and correspondence
5/3/88
5/4/88
5/s/88
s/e/88
5/LO/88
s/LL/88
s/L6/e8
5/L7 /88
5/L8/88
5/Le/88
5/2o/88
s/23/88
s/24/88
5/2s/88
5/3L/88
6/L/88
6/ 6/88
6/8/88
6/L6/88
6/L7 /88
6/20/88
revlewed correspondence and spoke to secry O.2re sending package to AG Federal Express
reviewed correspondence and opinions 0.1
tel conv. with secretary re staters extension 0.1
reviewed correspondence and opinions 0.3
reviewed correspondence and opinions; tel O.4calls re deftrs brief
calls to SR re fed ex for brief and discus- O.2sion with GR re getting brief
reviewed correspondence and opinions from O.4court
read B brief (1.0); tel conv. with LTM re 1.8our brief (.Zl t tel conv. with JUB re Baldwin
CC and B brief (.2) I reviewed correspondence
(.21 t conv. with finance dept re fees (.21
conf call with JUB and LTM (.8); work on 3.6reply brief (1.8)
work on post-trial reply briefi corres- 3.5
pondence
research at CA2 library re Connecticut O.2linited vote statute
finished draft of reply brief and sent to 5.5
cocounsel
correspondence from JUB re reimbursements 3.g(.3); revised, completed, and serrred post-
trial reply brief
reviewed correspondence and opinions o.4
reviewed correspondence and opinions O.z
reviewed correspondence and orders O.4
reviewed correspondence and orders O.3
reviewed correspondence and orders O.z
tel con with LTII (.8); reviewed correspon- 1.0
dence and orders
reviewed correspondence and orders
reviewed correspondence and orders
0.3
o.2
5/3/88
5/ 4/88
5/s/e8
5/e/88
5/Lo/88
5/LL/88
5/L6/88
5/L7 /88
5/L8/88
5/te/88
5/20/88
s/23/88
5/24/88
5/2s/88
s/3L/88
6/L/88
6/6/88
6/8/88
6/L6/88
6/L7 /88
6/20/88
revierred correspondence and spoke to secry O.2
re eending package to AG Federal Express
reviewed correspondence and oplnions O.1
te1 conv. with secretary re staters extension O.1
revl-ewed correspondence and opinions O. 3
reviewed correspondence and opinlons; tel O.4
calls re deft'e brief
calls to SR re fed ex for brief and
sion with GR re getting brief
reviewed correspondence and opinions
discus- O.2
from O.4
1.8
3.5
o.2
5.5
o.4
o.2
0.4
o.3
o.2
1.0
0.3
o.2
our brief (.2) i te} conv. with JUB re Baldwin
CC and B brief (.2) t reviewed correspondence
(.2) t conv. with finance dept re fees (.2)
conf call sith JUB and LTM (.8); work on 3.G
reply brief (1.8)
work on post-tria1 reply briefi corres-
pondence
research at CA2 lLbrary re Connecticut
Iimited vote statute
finished draft of reply brief and sent to
cocounsel
correspondence from JUB re reimbursements 3.8
(.3); revised, completed, and served post-
trial reply brief
court
read B brief (1.O); te1 conv. with LTII re
reviewed correspondence and opinions
reviewed correspondence and opinions
reviewed correspondence and orders
reviewed correspondence and orders
reviewed correspondence and orders
tel con with LTM (.8); reviewed correspon-
dence and orders
reviewed correspondence and orders
reviewed correspondence and orders
6/2L/88
6/23/88
6/28/88
7 / 4/88
7 /s/88
7 /6/88
7 /8/88
7 /LL/88
revLewed correBpondence and orders
revierred correspondence and orderE
reviewed correapondence and orders
reviewed reinbursenent for B subclass
e)q)enseB and prepared memo to finance
revl.ewed correspondence and orders
dLEcuEsed B eubclass reimbursement matrls
with Iani Guinier
reviewed correspondence and orders
prepared supplemental B affidavit and sent
to Ll[M
0.3
o.5
o.3
1.O
o.2
o.2
o.2
o.5
TOTAL 7L.7
4