Proposed Amended Answer of Defendants to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint

Public Court Documents
October 20, 1978

Proposed Amended Answer of Defendants to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Campbell v. Gadsden County District School Board Hardbacks. Proposed Amended Answer of Defendants to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, 1978. afc12cff-a111-f111-8407-0022482cdbbc. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f0672675-5b40-4c4f-b2fc-8f642a439104/proposed-amended-answer-of-defendants-to-plaintiffs-second-amended-complaint. Accessed March 05, 2026.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

WITT CAMPBELL, for Himself and 
Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, 

et al., 

) 
) 
) 
) 
) 

VS. ) TCA 73-177 

) 
) 
) 
) 

Defendants. ) 

) 

PROPOSED AMENDED ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS 

TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

COME NOW the Defendants, by and through their undersigned 

attorneys, and for answer to the Second Amended Complaint, say: 

1. The Defendants deny the allegation in paragraph 1. 

2. The Defendants deny the allegations in paragraph 2. 

3. The Defendants admit the allegations of the first, third 

and fifth sentences; and deny the allegations of the second, 

eighth and ninth sentences; and are without knowledge or informa- 

tion sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allega- 

tions of the fourth, sixth and seventh sentences. 

4. The Defendants are without knowledge or information 

sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations 

of paragraph 4. 

5. The Defendants admit the allegations of paragraph 5 

except they deny that no black citizen has ever been elected 

to the School Board. On September 12, 1978 a member of the 

black race, Mr. Harold Henderson, was elected to be a member 

of the School Board of Gadsden County, Florida. Defendants 

affirmatively allege that each member of the School Board of 

Gadsden County, Florida, must reside in the resident district 

from which he or she runs. 

6. The Defendants admit the allegations of the first and 

second sentences of paragraph 6 and further admit that Article 

IX, Section 4 of the Constitution of the State of Florida is 

AUSLEY, MCMULLEN, MCGEHEE, CAROTHERS & PROCTOR 

P. O. Box 381 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32302 

TELEPHONE (904) 224-9115 



constitutional on its face. The Defendants deny each and every 

remaining allegation contained in paragraph 6. 

7. The Defendants admit the first sentence of paragraph 7, 

and deny the second sentence of paragraph 7. 

8. The Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 8. 

9. The Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 9. 

10. The Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 10. 

11. The Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 11. 

12. The Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 12. 

13. The Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 13. 

DATED this the DORE day of October, 1978 on which date a 

copy of the foregoing was furnished by Hand Delivery to Kent Spriggs, 

Esquire, 324 West College Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32301 and 

by United States mail to Jack Crosby, Esquire and Charles 

Williams, Esquire, Legal Defense Fund, 10 Columbus Circle, New 

York, N.Y. 100189. 

RICHARD J. GARDNER 

201 Quincy State Bank Building 
Quincy, Florida 32351 

and 

C. GRAHAM CAROTHERS and 

MICHAEL PEA 

Ausley, McMullen, McGehee, 

Carothers & Proctor 

Post Office Box 391 

Tallahassee, Florida 32302 
(904) 224-9115 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS. 

AUSLEY, MCMULLEN, MCGEHEE, CAROTHERS & PROCTOR 

P. O. Box 391 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32302 

TELEPHONE (904) 224-9115

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.