Draft Order Joining Parties and Motion to Require Panel to Proceed with Studies and Planning

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)
RONALD BRADLEY, et al., )

)
Plaintiffs )

)v. )

WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al., j
)

Defendants )

and |

DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS )
LOCAL 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION )
OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO, )

)
Defendant-Intervenor )

)and )

DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al.,

Defendants»Intervenor

et al.

]
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO: 

35257

ORDER JOINING PARTIES

Pursuant to the Orders and Opinions of the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in this cause, 

Rules 19 and 21, F.R.Civ.P.,

IT IS ORDERED that the following school districts 

are joined as parties in this cause for purposes of assisting 

the Court and panel in developing an interim and/or final 

plan of desegregation for the Detroit Public Schools:



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RONALD BRADLEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al.,

Defendants,

and

DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS 
LOCAL 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION 
OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO,

and

DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al 

et al.

Defendant-Intervenor

9

Defendants-Intervenor

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO:
)
) 35257
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

MOTION TO REQUIRE THE COURT-APPOINTED 
PANEL TO PROCEED WITH ITS STUDIES AND PLANNING

NOW COME Plaintiffs, Ronald Bradley, et al., and move 

this Honorable Court to require the desegregation panel 

previously appointed by this Court to proceed with its studies 

and planning to the end that there will be no unnecessary 

delay in the implementation of an effective plan of desegre­

gation as contemplated by the Opinion and Order of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Bradley v. 

Milliken, F .2d (Nos. 72-1809, 72-1814, Dec. 8, 1972)

Slip op. 69-79. Plaintiffs further move that this Honorable 

Court order the defendants and school districts involved, 

including any additional parties joined pursuant to Rules 19 and 

21, to supply administrative and staff assistance to the panel 

upon its request and that the reasonable costs incurred by 

the panel be paid as provided by the District Court's Order 

of June 14, 1972.



• *
Bradley v. Mllliken, F.2d (Nos. 72-1309, 72-1814,

Dec. 8, 1972) Slip op. 69* aff’g in pertinent part, Order 

for Development of Plan of Desegregation (June 14, 1972)

Part I.C. Plaintiffs further move that this Honorable Court 

issue an Order requiring (a) that the panel submit its 

plan, and supporting studies, within 7 5 days from the 

entry of this Court*s Order; (b) that the parties file 

complete legal and practical objections and any alternative 

to such plans, supporting briefs, and memoranda detailing 

proof to be offered at any hearing no later than 25 days 

after the filing of the panel*s report; (c) and that hearings 

on all relevant issues raised commence 15 days thereafter.

Respectfully submitted,

LOUIS R. LUCAS 
WILLIAM E. CALDWELL

Ratner, Sugermon & Lucas 
525 Commerce Title Bldg. 
Memphis, Tennessee

NATHANIEL JONES 
General Counsel 
N.A.A.C.P.
1790 Broadway 
New York, New York

PAUL R. DIMOND 
906 Rose Avenue 
Ann Arbor, Michigan 

J. HAROLD FLANNERY 
ROBERT PRESSMAN

Center for Law & Education 
61 Kirkland Street 
Cambridge, Massachusetts

E. WINTHER McCROOM 
3425 Woodburn Avenue 
Cincinnati, Ohio

JACK GREENBERG 
NORMAN J. CHACHKIN 

10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York

* »  2 -