Order Modifying Irwin Avenue School Transportation Plan
Public Court Documents
August 29, 1969
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Working Files. Order Modifying Irwin Avenue School Transportation Plan, 1969. 485dc4db-3234-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f138cd56-b0d7-4cf3-a679-4709084241a9/order-modifying-irwin-avenue-school-transportation-plan. Accessed June 02, 2026.
Copied!
[||a3a6d7b8-dea9-4b12-b866-3bb4d9bdadd0||] IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE -WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte Division Hii 6a nen
Civil Action. Fo. 1974 ia {
ad Cd Fe Riiolaors Cle i
uU hd S & L i % ki { " §
pn o “ . .
wr 11 - ge ; i 4
JAMES E ® SW: J ANN ? et al ? Plai pi Kp He F558 # ) i ~- 1 “a Ae lvoe ;
Se : ]
VS — ) ORDER :
THE IARLOTTE~-MECKLENBURG BOARD ) :
ng . WPI ”
| :
OF Cie et al, ) | }
De fe ndants ~~ oe )
:
Ii - : ; z
:
The School Board's amended plan for desegregation of :
the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools was approved el order Of i
August 15, 1969. The Board has now tendered
a modification to this plan which was filed today. August :
29, 1959.
The modification relates to the act ties to be pro-
vided for those blac dren whose parents exercise freedom
of choice to attend a black elementary school in the inner !
city instead of attending the whice schools listed in the
July 29, 1969 plan which has already been, approved by the i
court. ¢
The amendment calls for using the building of former i
Irwin Avenue Junior High School with certain minor renova-
tions, instead of Zeb Vance School, and a limit of six
hundred students upon those who would be admitted to this
program at Irwin Avenue School. This part of the motion |
to amend is approved. The choice of i per se, is |
a matter for the School Board, not the cou
The amendment DROposss that the Irwin Avenue School
an innovative school.” he court
f by this phrase is meant
& :
81 —.
would be operated "as
does not know what this means.
that anything will be done tO ma
to the black students than the b
attending, then. the program will constitute the location and
ack schools they have been
use Of a school facility for the purpose of promoting segre-
gation which by orevious decisions of this and oti
the defendants have been fully advised is unconstitu ; hg
L
Felder, et atl, Vv. Harnett County, North Caro.lina
1070 (4th Cironit, 19 STR April 22, 1969), ‘and cases
cited therein. The addition of innovations” at Ixwin
Avenue, Scheel will not be approved by the court unless
these "i-novations” have been arranged and provided for
211 the _ilack students who transfer TO white schools undcel
the July 29. 1969 plan of the Board previously approved.
The phrase » innovative” may refex to what the Board has
heretofore called "compensatory education.” The court has
not yet been advised of any performance by the Board in line
with the undertaking in its July 29, 199 plan to provide
"compensatory education" for pupils who lag behind their
classmates in academic achievement. Unless and until the
court can be informed and satisfied that this "ocompensatory
education” is provided in the other schools, the court is
of the opinion that providing it in the Irwin Avenue School
would set up a magnet to attract black children away from
desegregated assignments and therefore on the present record
at least that part of the plan is disapproved.
The proposal to provide transportation for any of the
students attending Irwin Avenue School is expressly disapproved.
The effect of providing transportation is to subsidize at tax
payers’ expense those who are actively seeking to defeat the
constitutional mandate to desegregate the schools. NO auth-
ted to justify such a flagrant
violation of the law, and none has been imagined by the court.
The Board is expres trained from and enjoined against
providing transportation in any form to any student in the
system, black or white, which may OXY might enable him to
travel any part of the distance from his home to or from
any school elected by or for him under "freedom of transfer"
or "freedom of choice," except that the Board may provide
transportation as previously ordered by | this court to those
students who elect. to transfer or who are transferred by the
Board from a school in which thelr race{is in a majority to
a school in which their race is in the minority. As this
court pointed out before, bus transportation has too long
been used as a tool to promote segregation. The year 1969
is too late in the day to start using this tool for that
purpose in new situations.
This the 29th day of August, 1969.
8
4 pd / 5 7 7 Z
& pd wh pa.
V4 ¢ FV we
[/ united States District Judge [||a3a6d7b8-dea9-4b12-b866-3bb4d9bdadd0||]