Order
Public Court Documents
August 2, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Court Hears 2 Interpretations of Voting Rights in Districting Case (The New York Times), 1985. 0fc34cd8-db92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/c672fb93-8fcd-415e-b173-fd78bdbcdda8/court-hears-2-interpretations-of-voting-rights-in-districting-case-the-new-york-times. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
By swear TAYLOR ‘32; Snack! to The New York limes WASHINGTON Dec 4 — The Rea- gan Admirals etion and a civil rights lawyer at before the Supreme Com itoo‘a bout whether the North 2: of the 1982 amend "1g Rights Act of 1965 Th 1 nest etion has argued thet “mirglrlty voters have m right to the creation of safe electoral districts gladly beeause they could feasibly be ram ‘ .iuljius Levonne Chambers, director- lof the NAACP Legal Defense mhducetional Fund Inc , told the 3.3“ thet the Administration’s the law was too name and that North Carolina had violated it. “Blacks do not have and have not had an equal opportunity to pafiicipate in. the elec» to oralfiprocess and to elect representa- tlveeof their choice, " he said. , The admendments were erected to overcome a Supreme Court decision in- temthfing the original 1965 Voting Rights Act as requiring proof of inten- tions? discrimination «7'; Solicitor Cites Winners Inf arguments today, the United States Solicitor General, Charles Frie; supporting North Carolina’ 5 ap- pea‘isf a decision by a Federal district court that invalidated several districts, ' said blacks had a fair opponuiutyto participate in the political process in at Mr. Chambers said the Court should defer to the close examination at the complex facts by the three judge Fed- eral i) strict Court that found seven , ‘ violations? .‘nelaw in 198.2 sacks had been 0 elect repre- ' of their Choice by the stste’ 5 use of nultimembe; districts and fail- tire to create districts with» strong black majorities, combines with the refusal of most whites to vote for blacks and the lingering effects of past obstacles to black voter registration, Mr. Chambers acknowledged today that literacy tests, ”winch he identified as the most recent human; to black registration, had ended. about 1970. But he mid black voter registration was still low and the relative poverty of blacks compared with whites, made it difficult to run cos 1;: campaigns in multimember districts Blacks make up about 22. 4 percent of The urn: York Solicitor General Charles Fried North Caiolina 5 population, but blacks had never held more than 4 percent of the Seats in either house of the State . Legislature before the ewsmt started Theyhold loofthelmseats inthelegis lature now The questions posed by various chambers of the Court illustrated the factual complexity of a m in which least three and perhaps all five of those - distficts before the Court. lie said this Was established by the lat masks had won several seats . awn by the Legislature in a stat ewide reapportiomnmt after the for a standard of tokenlsrn” in , , merit of voting rights ‘ Admhustration’s position' in the case, as been opposed as contrary to .the intent of Congress not only by civil 7 rightslawyers but also by the Republi~ I a can National Conunittee, the North Carolina Republican party, and Sena- tor Bob Dole of Kansas, the Republican 1 ' , leader, who was the sponsor of the com- promise that pushed the 1m amend- merits through Congress Mr Chambers, who is representing a gouge of blacks to North Carolina. said bloc had never been adequately rep» resented 1n the Legislature and that the 19m electltm results were deceptive be- ‘ cause whites hadsupported black can- ' .didstesmhopesof undermlrungthe black voters’ lawsuit. ' Mr; Chamberselsosald thatbecause "fol the efislature’s failure to create ' dist ”with solid black majodties, the bldcks who Were elected had to ap- -; peol‘to white voters and were not the be: repmematives or black com- , :muniti‘es. Amending of the Law will]? Adennist’ration, initially oppos— 318' P , , ‘electicodisuicts Sectionz, asamend Meet“ prohibits practices that afford mettlbersofmlnoritygmups‘fletisop- , stitcrmgmbers ofthe1 their choice." much of theeviclence mists of a con- fusing melange of numbers In answer to various questions, Mr. Chambers reeled of! the numbers of venous election districts, the numbers oi black voters and white voters in them, the numbers of black candidates position THE NEW yogi: TIMBs, THL.:-'1f._~::r1..11: EECEAfBfiRj: _ 1281 elected, the percentages of whites who had voted for blacks, and more. with nexttious from me election to the While many winters land them. selves gasping “111 the lawyer's wake one thing was seat: Mr uracil-11ers said the nmubezs showed the ’sghlsof blacks had been isolated. and Mr. Fried and Lacy E. 'lltoreburg. Attor- neylGener-al for North Carolina said the opposite. ML. Fried said the 1982 amendmmts ‘ were a “middle path between two ext ‘ , treaties,” They were designed to allow j minority groups to prove violations ‘ without showing hitentionel discrimi— g nation, hessid, butmttoatlowlower' Federal cote-ts to overturn state elec— ' tics districts Wei- the lodges think . too few blacks are getting elected. He 3 t the lower cunt had in ef- fect required “proportimal #er tattoo." of blacks a goal Comes: ex» 3 plieltly rejected. Your Money Saturday in Business Day The New York Tenet 'l Court Hears 2 Interpretations of Voting Rights in Dishicting Case j rtedthehlr. Thol’fibul'g’s