Motion For Extension of Time Within Which to Answer
Public Court Documents
April 15, 1982
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Motion For Extension of Time Within Which to Answer, 1982. 3d31a4ce-c803-ef11-a1fd-6045bddbf119. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f451fbee-8aff-4ede-8f13-93b55a1f9f98/motion-for-extension-of-time-within-which-to-answer. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BARBARA MAJOR, ET AL CIVIL ACTION
versus NUMBER 82-1192
DAVID C. TREEN, ET AL SECTION H (D) (C)
* * * * * * * * * * *
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER
|
NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, come the defendants herein, |
who move this Honorable Court to grant an extension of time within which to
file an answer pursuant to Rule 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for
the following reasons:
1. Complexity of legal and factual allegations of
plaintiffs’ complaint.
Complexity of defendants' defense which has necessitated
the appointment of Special Assistant Attorney General,
David R. Poynter, as of April 9, 1982.
Pendancy of a motion to consolidate this suit with
Civil Action No. 82-1136, Robert E. Couhig, et al wv.
James L. Brown, Secretary of State.
Respectfully submitted,
WILLIAM J. GUSTE, JR.
Attorney General
State of Louisiana
Bore £27
David RH. Poynter
Special Assistant is General
POYNTER, MANNEAR & SPEER
344 Napoleon Street
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802
(504) 34446733
Kenneth C. DeJean
Chief Counsel
Department of Justice
P. O. Box 445005
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804
(504) 342-7013
APR 16 1982 AER: DATE OF ENTRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BARBARA MAJOR, ET AL CIVIL ACTION
versus NUMBER 82-1192
DAVID C. TREEN, ET AL SECTION H (D) (C)
* * * * * * * *
QRDER
Considering the defendants' motion, the opposition thereto, the law
and the evidence, and the arguments of counsel,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants be granted an extension of time
within which to answer until May 3, 1982.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this [ST A day of Aff s 1982,
7 4
We a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE