Correspondence from Kellogg to Cassimere
Correspondence
October 29, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Kellogg to Cassimere, 1982. 138151ca-c703-ef11-a1fd-002248219001. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f546a0ec-75c4-451f-94db-3bfef7c43916/correspondence-from-kellogg-to-cassimere. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
LAW OFFICES OF
QUIGLEY & SCHECKMAN
631 ST. CHARLES AVENUE
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130
TELEPHONE: 504-524-0016
WILLIAM P. QUIGLEY IN ASSOCIATION WITH
STEVEN SCHECKMAN R. JAMES KELLOGG
MARK S. GOLDSTEIN
RONALD J. PURSELL
October 29, 1982
Dr. Raphael Cassimere, Jr.
History Department
University of New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana
Re: ’ Major v. Treen
Dear Ralph:
We are extremely pleased that you have agreed to testify as an expert witness
for the plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter relating to the reapportion-
ment of the Louisiana Congressional districts. This letter will set forth
the details of our relationship, as I appreciate them.
The trial begins in the federal courthouse in New Orleans on January 31, 1983
before Federal District Judges Collins and Cassibry and Federal Circuit Judge
Politz. Trial is expected to last five (5) days and our current best guess
is that you will testify on the first or second day.
Although the exact contours of your testimony have not been determined as of
this date, we probably want you to testify on the following issues:
1) Racist history of Louisiana history virtually every aspect of
life, focusing on period up to but not including 1960 school
desegregation battles. This hisbory will necessarily include:
a) Reconstruction and its aftermath including use of
Jim Crowe laws, disfranchisement of blacks including use of
grandfather clauses
b) racial appeals in electoral campaigns, including
Third Party Politics
c) efficacy of Third Parties in Louisiana
d) comparison of voter registration statistics prior
to VRA with statistics after VRA
Dr. Raphael cassimere, Jr.
Major v. Treen
Page 2
2) The use of various disfranchisement techniques by Louisiana officials
including literacy tests, poll taxes, white primaries, property own-
ership requirements, etc.
I realize this deliniation may be somewhat broader than we spoke earlier, but
I don't think you will have any problem. If you feel you are unable to develop
any of these areas, please get in touch with me. We have some material on
Treen (including his biography) if you fell it would be of any use.
After looking at our budget, I find we will be able to pay you a fee of four
hundred ($400) dollars. Obviously, however, if our requests involve signi-
ficantly more time than anticipated, we are willing to renegotiate your fee.
The Court has ordered that expert witness reports be exchanged by the parties
on or before January 5, 1983. Accordingly, we would like a preliminary re-
port from you on or before December 6 (it need not be in writing) and the
final report by January 3. We expect the defendants will want to schedule
your deposition in late December or early January, at a time and place
convenient to you.
We are very excited to be able to work with you and feel your experience
and expertise will be a great asset to our case.
If any matter in this letter is unclear or if you have any question, please
get in touch with me at your earliest convenience.
Welcome aboard!
Sincerely,
i,
ine etary
¥
R. James Kellogg
cc: Lani Guinier
Stan Halpin
Bill Quigley
Steve Scheckman