Motion of Defendants-Appellants for Supplemental Briefing Schedule
Public Court Documents
October 22, 1976
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Norwood v. Harrison - Hardbacks. Motion of Defendants-Appellants for Supplemental Briefing Schedule, 1976. 4ec09cf4-722e-f111-88b4-0022482cdbbc. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f570349b-3b74-44a6-80e3-0ba9cbccea3c/motion-of-defendants-appellants-for-supplemental-briefing-schedule. Accessed July 18, 2026.
Copied!
[||24304c45-a0bd-4daa-8c99-6a04fe6fa590||] DErawTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the Attorney General
an JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205
ALF Sua vER PETER M. STOCKETT
ATTORNEY GEXERAT SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
October 22, 1876
Mr. Edward W. Wadsworth
United States Court of Appeals
for the Pifth Circuit
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
RE: Delores Norwood, et al
Vv. : No. 76-1865
D. LL. Harrison, Sr., st al
Dear Mr. Wadsworth:
Enclosed is an original and three copies of our
Motion of Defendants-Appellants for Supplemental Briefing
Schedule in the above referenced matter.
With very best wishes,
Yours very truly,
A 0 Vo PH
Peter M. Stocketd, “Jr.
Special Assistant Attorney General
PMSjr/cb
Enclosures
Baal SAR leas Sian rR SEF Toh
IN THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE PIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 76-1355
DELORES NORWOOD, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
D. L. HARRISON, SR., ET AL
Defendants—-Appellants
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
MOTION OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
COME NOW defendants-appellants, by their attorney,
and move this Court for the establishment of a supplemental
briefing schedule in this cause and for reason state;
l. By letter dated October 6, 1976, counsel for
plaintiffs-appellees called the attention of the Court to
RE THI,
the fact Congress had passed S.2278, the Civil Rights Attorneys’
Fees Awards Act of 1976, contending that this legislation,
if signed by the president, would be dispositive of this
appeal. Counsel for defendants-appellants is informed that
the President signed this legislation into law on October 19,
1976. |
Counsel for defedants-appellants is making an effort
to obtain a copy of the Public Law which embodies this legis-
lation, along with the relevant legislative history, including
all committee reports and floor debates in the Seante and
in the House of Representatives.
It is necessary that counsel for defedants-appellants
have a reasonable time to familiarize himself with this relevant
material. Said counsel definitely and specifically requests
the right to brief the issues presented by this new legislation
and its relevant legislative history. Defendants-appellants
do not concede that enactment of this legislation justifies
the granting of summary affirmance, as requested by plaintiff-
appellees. We submit that elemental due process requires
that we be given the opportunity to present our position on
these new developments to the Court.
2. The Court has granted the Motion of plaintiffs-
appellees to supplement the record on appeal so as to include
the deposition of M. A. Snowden and all exhibits thereto taken
4
on June 28, 1971. This Order was entered on October 18, 1976.
Counsel for defendants-appellants has been unable to find
a copy of this deposition in the files in the office of the
Attorney General of Mississippi. Counsel for plaintiffs-
appellees, Melvyn R. Leventhal, Esquire, has stated that he
will furnish counsel for defendants—-appellants this deposition,
including exhibits, for copying.
Defendants—-appellants submit that elemental due
process requires they be afforded the right to examine this
new exhibit, which this Court has ordered admitted into the
record. Defendants-appellants also desire the right, after
examination of the Snowden deposition and its exhibits, to
submit to the Court a supplemental brief setting forth our
views and positions as to the facts shown by the newly admitted
evidence.
WHEREFORE, defendants-appellants move this Court for
an order establishing a supplemental briefing schedule on
the issues above mentioned.
Respectfully submitted,
A. F. SUMMER, ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF MISSISSIPPY
PETER M. STOCRETT, JR.
SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY:
PETER M. STOCKETT,) JR.
CERTIFICATE
The undersigned counsel of record for the defendants
hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the fore-
going Motion for Supplemental Briefing Schedule has been
mailed, postage prepaid through the United States Mail,
to the following:
Melvyn R. Leventhal, Esquire
Suite 2030, 10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
THIS the 22nd day of October, 1976.
Cr Ca
PETER M. STOCKETT,) JR. [||24304c45-a0bd-4daa-8c99-6a04fe6fa590||]